Cargando…
Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme
BACKGROUND: LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons are a notable endogenous source of mutagenesis in mammals. Notably, cancer cells can support unusual L1 retrotransposition and L1-associated sequence rearrangement mechanisms following DNA damage. Recent reports suggest that L1 is mobile in epithelial tumours...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13100-016-0076-6 |
_version_ | 1782466879767445504 |
---|---|
author | Carreira, Patricia E. Ewing, Adam D. Li, Guibo Schauer, Stephanie N. Upton, Kyle R. Fagg, Allister C. Morell, Santiago Kindlova, Michaela Gerdes, Patricia Richardson, Sandra R. Li, Bo Gerhardt, Daniel J. Wang, Jun Brennan, Paul M. Faulkner, Geoffrey J. |
author_facet | Carreira, Patricia E. Ewing, Adam D. Li, Guibo Schauer, Stephanie N. Upton, Kyle R. Fagg, Allister C. Morell, Santiago Kindlova, Michaela Gerdes, Patricia Richardson, Sandra R. Li, Bo Gerhardt, Daniel J. Wang, Jun Brennan, Paul M. Faulkner, Geoffrey J. |
author_sort | Carreira, Patricia E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons are a notable endogenous source of mutagenesis in mammals. Notably, cancer cells can support unusual L1 retrotransposition and L1-associated sequence rearrangement mechanisms following DNA damage. Recent reports suggest that L1 is mobile in epithelial tumours and neural cells but, paradoxically, not in brain cancers. RESULTS: Here, using retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq), we surveyed L1 mutations in 14 tumours classified as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or as a lower grade glioma. In four GBM tumours, we characterised one probable endonuclease-independent L1 insertion, two L1-associated rearrangements and one likely Alu-Alu recombination event adjacent to an L1. These mutations included PCR validated intronic events in MeCP2 and EGFR. Despite sequencing L1 integration sites at up to 250× depth by RC-seq, we found no tumour-specific, endonuclease-dependent L1 insertions. Whole genome sequencing analysis of the tumours carrying the MeCP2 and EGFR L1 mutations also revealed no endonuclease-dependent L1 insertions. In a complementary in vitro assay, wild-type and endonuclease mutant L1 reporter constructs each mobilised very inefficiently in four cultured GBM cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments altogether highlight the consistent absence of canonical L1 retrotransposition in GBM tumours and cultured cell lines, as well as atypical L1-associated sequence rearrangements following DNA damage in vivo. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0076-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5105311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51053112016-11-14 Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme Carreira, Patricia E. Ewing, Adam D. Li, Guibo Schauer, Stephanie N. Upton, Kyle R. Fagg, Allister C. Morell, Santiago Kindlova, Michaela Gerdes, Patricia Richardson, Sandra R. Li, Bo Gerhardt, Daniel J. Wang, Jun Brennan, Paul M. Faulkner, Geoffrey J. Mob DNA Research BACKGROUND: LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons are a notable endogenous source of mutagenesis in mammals. Notably, cancer cells can support unusual L1 retrotransposition and L1-associated sequence rearrangement mechanisms following DNA damage. Recent reports suggest that L1 is mobile in epithelial tumours and neural cells but, paradoxically, not in brain cancers. RESULTS: Here, using retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq), we surveyed L1 mutations in 14 tumours classified as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or as a lower grade glioma. In four GBM tumours, we characterised one probable endonuclease-independent L1 insertion, two L1-associated rearrangements and one likely Alu-Alu recombination event adjacent to an L1. These mutations included PCR validated intronic events in MeCP2 and EGFR. Despite sequencing L1 integration sites at up to 250× depth by RC-seq, we found no tumour-specific, endonuclease-dependent L1 insertions. Whole genome sequencing analysis of the tumours carrying the MeCP2 and EGFR L1 mutations also revealed no endonuclease-dependent L1 insertions. In a complementary in vitro assay, wild-type and endonuclease mutant L1 reporter constructs each mobilised very inefficiently in four cultured GBM cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments altogether highlight the consistent absence of canonical L1 retrotransposition in GBM tumours and cultured cell lines, as well as atypical L1-associated sequence rearrangements following DNA damage in vivo. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0076-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5105311/ /pubmed/27843499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13100-016-0076-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Carreira, Patricia E. Ewing, Adam D. Li, Guibo Schauer, Stephanie N. Upton, Kyle R. Fagg, Allister C. Morell, Santiago Kindlova, Michaela Gerdes, Patricia Richardson, Sandra R. Li, Bo Gerhardt, Daniel J. Wang, Jun Brennan, Paul M. Faulkner, Geoffrey J. Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
title | Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
title_full | Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
title_fullStr | Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
title_short | Evidence for L1-associated DNA rearrangements and negligible L1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
title_sort | evidence for l1-associated dna rearrangements and negligible l1 retrotransposition in glioblastoma multiforme |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13100-016-0076-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carreirapatriciae evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT ewingadamd evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT liguibo evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT schauerstephanien evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT uptonkyler evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT faggallisterc evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT morellsantiago evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT kindlovamichaela evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT gerdespatricia evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT richardsonsandrar evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT libo evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT gerhardtdanielj evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT wangjun evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT brennanpaulm evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme AT faulknergeoffreyj evidenceforl1associateddnarearrangementsandnegligiblel1retrotranspositioninglioblastomamultiforme |