Cargando…

Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present the outcome of the microsurgical foraminotomy via Wiltse paraspinal approach for foraminal or extraforaminal (FEF) stenosis at L5–S1 level. We investigated risk factors associated with poor outcome of microsurgical foraminotomy at L5–S1 level. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sung-Ik, Chough, Chung-Kee, Choi, Shu-Chung, Chun, Jin-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.610
_version_ 1782467035725299712
author Cho, Sung-Ik
Chough, Chung-Kee
Choi, Shu-Chung
Chun, Jin-Young
author_facet Cho, Sung-Ik
Chough, Chung-Kee
Choi, Shu-Chung
Chun, Jin-Young
author_sort Cho, Sung-Ik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present the outcome of the microsurgical foraminotomy via Wiltse paraspinal approach for foraminal or extraforaminal (FEF) stenosis at L5–S1 level. We investigated risk factors associated with poor outcome of microsurgical foraminotomy at L5–S1 level. METHODS: We analyzed 21 patients who underwent the microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5–S1 level. To investigate risk factors associated with poor outcome, patients were classified into two groups (success and failure in foraminotomy). Clinical outcomes were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of back and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including existence of spondylolisthesis, existence and degree of coronal wedging, disc height, foramen height, segmental lordotic angle (SLA) on neutral and dynamic view, segmental range of motion, and global lumbar lordotic angle were investigated. RESULTS: Postoperative VAS score and ODI improved after foraminotomy. However, there were 7 patients (33%) who had persistent or recurrent leg pain. SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films were significantly associated with the failure in foraminotomy (p<0.05). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis revealed the optimal cut-off values of SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films for predicting failure in foraminotomy were 17.3° and 24°s, respectively. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5–S1 level can provide good clinical outcomes in selected patients. Poor outcomes were associated with large SLA on preoperative neutral (>17.3°) and extension radiographic films (>24°).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5106361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51063612016-11-15 Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome Cho, Sung-Ik Chough, Chung-Kee Choi, Shu-Chung Chun, Jin-Young J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present the outcome of the microsurgical foraminotomy via Wiltse paraspinal approach for foraminal or extraforaminal (FEF) stenosis at L5–S1 level. We investigated risk factors associated with poor outcome of microsurgical foraminotomy at L5–S1 level. METHODS: We analyzed 21 patients who underwent the microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5–S1 level. To investigate risk factors associated with poor outcome, patients were classified into two groups (success and failure in foraminotomy). Clinical outcomes were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of back and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including existence of spondylolisthesis, existence and degree of coronal wedging, disc height, foramen height, segmental lordotic angle (SLA) on neutral and dynamic view, segmental range of motion, and global lumbar lordotic angle were investigated. RESULTS: Postoperative VAS score and ODI improved after foraminotomy. However, there were 7 patients (33%) who had persistent or recurrent leg pain. SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films were significantly associated with the failure in foraminotomy (p<0.05). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis revealed the optimal cut-off values of SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films for predicting failure in foraminotomy were 17.3° and 24°s, respectively. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5–S1 level can provide good clinical outcomes in selected patients. Poor outcomes were associated with large SLA on preoperative neutral (>17.3°) and extension radiographic films (>24°). The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016-11 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5106361/ /pubmed/27847575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.610 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Cho, Sung-Ik
Chough, Chung-Kee
Choi, Shu-Chung
Chun, Jin-Young
Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome
title Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome
title_full Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome
title_fullStr Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome
title_short Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome
title_sort microsurgical foraminotomy via wiltse paraspinal approach for foraminal or extraforaminal stenosis at l5-s1 level : risk factor analysis for poor outcome
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.610
work_keys_str_mv AT chosungik microsurgicalforaminotomyviawiltseparaspinalapproachforforaminalorextraforaminalstenosisatl5s1levelriskfactoranalysisforpooroutcome
AT choughchungkee microsurgicalforaminotomyviawiltseparaspinalapproachforforaminalorextraforaminalstenosisatl5s1levelriskfactoranalysisforpooroutcome
AT choishuchung microsurgicalforaminotomyviawiltseparaspinalapproachforforaminalorextraforaminalstenosisatl5s1levelriskfactoranalysisforpooroutcome
AT chunjinyoung microsurgicalforaminotomyviawiltseparaspinalapproachforforaminalorextraforaminalstenosisatl5s1levelriskfactoranalysisforpooroutcome