Cargando…

Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in patients during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock, to support both cardiac and pulmonary function. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing mortality in patients treated with an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouweneel, Dagmar M., Schotborgh, Jasper V., Limpens, Jacqueline, Sjauw, Krischan D., Engström, A. E., Lagrand, Wim K., Cherpanath, Thomas G. V., Driessen, Antoine H. G., de Mol, Bas A. J. M., Henriques, José P. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8
_version_ 1782467053053018112
author Ouweneel, Dagmar M.
Schotborgh, Jasper V.
Limpens, Jacqueline
Sjauw, Krischan D.
Engström, A. E.
Lagrand, Wim K.
Cherpanath, Thomas G. V.
Driessen, Antoine H. G.
de Mol, Bas A. J. M.
Henriques, José P. S.
author_facet Ouweneel, Dagmar M.
Schotborgh, Jasper V.
Limpens, Jacqueline
Sjauw, Krischan D.
Engström, A. E.
Lagrand, Wim K.
Cherpanath, Thomas G. V.
Driessen, Antoine H. G.
de Mol, Bas A. J. M.
Henriques, José P. S.
author_sort Ouweneel, Dagmar M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in patients during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock, to support both cardiac and pulmonary function. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing mortality in patients treated with and without ECLS support in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the publisher subset of PubMed updated to December 2015. Thirteen studies were included of which nine included cardiac arrest patients (n = 3098) and four included patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (n = 235). Data were pooled by a Mantel-Haenzel random effects model and heterogeneity was examined by the I (2) statistic. RESULTS: In cardiac arrest, the use of ECLS was associated with an absolute increase of 30 days survival of 13 % compared with patients in which ECLS was not used [95 % CI 6–20 %; p < 0.001; number needed to treat (NNT) 7.7] and a higher rate of favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (absolute risk difference 14 %; 95 % CI 7–20 %; p < 0.0001; NNT 7.1). Propensity matched analysis, including 5 studies and 438 patients (219 in both groups), showed similar results. In cardiogenic shock, ECLS showed a 33 % higher 30-day survival compared with IABP (95 % CI, 14–52 %; p < 0.001; NNT 13) but no difference when compared with TandemHeart/Impella (−3 %; 95 % CI −21 to 14 %; p = 0.70; NNH 33). CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac arrest, the use of ECLS was associated with an increased survival rate as well as an increase in favourable neurological outcome. In the setting of cardiogenic shock there was an increased survival with ECLS compared with IABP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5106498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51064982016-11-25 Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ouweneel, Dagmar M. Schotborgh, Jasper V. Limpens, Jacqueline Sjauw, Krischan D. Engström, A. E. Lagrand, Wim K. Cherpanath, Thomas G. V. Driessen, Antoine H. G. de Mol, Bas A. J. M. Henriques, José P. S. Intensive Care Med Systematic Review PURPOSE: Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in patients during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock, to support both cardiac and pulmonary function. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing mortality in patients treated with and without ECLS support in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the publisher subset of PubMed updated to December 2015. Thirteen studies were included of which nine included cardiac arrest patients (n = 3098) and four included patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (n = 235). Data were pooled by a Mantel-Haenzel random effects model and heterogeneity was examined by the I (2) statistic. RESULTS: In cardiac arrest, the use of ECLS was associated with an absolute increase of 30 days survival of 13 % compared with patients in which ECLS was not used [95 % CI 6–20 %; p < 0.001; number needed to treat (NNT) 7.7] and a higher rate of favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (absolute risk difference 14 %; 95 % CI 7–20 %; p < 0.0001; NNT 7.1). Propensity matched analysis, including 5 studies and 438 patients (219 in both groups), showed similar results. In cardiogenic shock, ECLS showed a 33 % higher 30-day survival compared with IABP (95 % CI, 14–52 %; p < 0.001; NNT 13) but no difference when compared with TandemHeart/Impella (−3 %; 95 % CI −21 to 14 %; p = 0.70; NNH 33). CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac arrest, the use of ECLS was associated with an increased survival rate as well as an increase in favourable neurological outcome. In the setting of cardiogenic shock there was an increased survival with ECLS compared with IABP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-19 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5106498/ /pubmed/27647331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ouweneel, Dagmar M.
Schotborgh, Jasper V.
Limpens, Jacqueline
Sjauw, Krischan D.
Engström, A. E.
Lagrand, Wim K.
Cherpanath, Thomas G. V.
Driessen, Antoine H. G.
de Mol, Bas A. J. M.
Henriques, José P. S.
Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ouweneeldagmarm extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schotborghjasperv extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limpensjacqueline extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sjauwkrischand extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT engstromae extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lagrandwimk extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cherpanaththomasgv extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT driessenantoinehg extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demolbasajm extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT henriquesjoseps extracorporeallifesupportduringcardiacarrestandcardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis