Cargando…

Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is thought to improve upper limb (UL) motor function after stroke when utilizing intensive training with many repetitions. The purpose of this study was to compare intensity and content of a VR training intervention to a conventional task-oriented interventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunner, Iris, Skouen, Jan Sture, Hofstad, Håkon, Aßmuss, Jörg, Becker, Frank, Pallesen, Hanne, Thijs, Liselot, Verheyden, Geert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27835977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y
_version_ 1782467123543539712
author Brunner, Iris
Skouen, Jan Sture
Hofstad, Håkon
Aßmuss, Jörg
Becker, Frank
Pallesen, Hanne
Thijs, Liselot
Verheyden, Geert
author_facet Brunner, Iris
Skouen, Jan Sture
Hofstad, Håkon
Aßmuss, Jörg
Becker, Frank
Pallesen, Hanne
Thijs, Liselot
Verheyden, Geert
author_sort Brunner, Iris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is thought to improve upper limb (UL) motor function after stroke when utilizing intensive training with many repetitions. The purpose of this study was to compare intensity and content of a VR training intervention to a conventional task-oriented intervention (CT). METHODS: A random sample of 50 video recordings was analyzed of patients with a broad range of UL motor impairments (mean age 61y, 22 women). Patients took part in the VIRTUES trial and were randomized to either VR or CT and stratified according to severity of paresis. A standardized scoring form was used to analyze intensity, i.e. active use of the affected UL expressed in % of total time, total active time and total duration of a training session in minutes, content of training and feedback. Two raters collected data independently. Linear regression models as well as descriptive and graphical methods were used. RESULTS: Patients in the VR group spent significantly more time actively practicing with an activity rate of 77.6 (8.9) % than patients in the CT 67.3 (13.9) %, (p = .003). This difference was attributed to the subgroup of patients with initially severe paresis (n = 22). While in VR severely impaired patients spent 80.7 % (4.4 %) of the session time actively; they reached 60.6 (12.1) % in CT. VR and CT also differed in terms of tasks and feedback provided. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that patients with severely impaired UL motor function spent more time actively in VR training, which may influence recovery. The upcoming results of the VIRTUES trial will show whether this is correlated with an increased effect of VR compared to CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02079103, February 27, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5106796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51067962016-11-25 Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content Brunner, Iris Skouen, Jan Sture Hofstad, Håkon Aßmuss, Jörg Becker, Frank Pallesen, Hanne Thijs, Liselot Verheyden, Geert BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is thought to improve upper limb (UL) motor function after stroke when utilizing intensive training with many repetitions. The purpose of this study was to compare intensity and content of a VR training intervention to a conventional task-oriented intervention (CT). METHODS: A random sample of 50 video recordings was analyzed of patients with a broad range of UL motor impairments (mean age 61y, 22 women). Patients took part in the VIRTUES trial and were randomized to either VR or CT and stratified according to severity of paresis. A standardized scoring form was used to analyze intensity, i.e. active use of the affected UL expressed in % of total time, total active time and total duration of a training session in minutes, content of training and feedback. Two raters collected data independently. Linear regression models as well as descriptive and graphical methods were used. RESULTS: Patients in the VR group spent significantly more time actively practicing with an activity rate of 77.6 (8.9) % than patients in the CT 67.3 (13.9) %, (p = .003). This difference was attributed to the subgroup of patients with initially severe paresis (n = 22). While in VR severely impaired patients spent 80.7 % (4.4 %) of the session time actively; they reached 60.6 (12.1) % in CT. VR and CT also differed in terms of tasks and feedback provided. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that patients with severely impaired UL motor function spent more time actively in VR training, which may influence recovery. The upcoming results of the VIRTUES trial will show whether this is correlated with an increased effect of VR compared to CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02079103, February 27, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5106796/ /pubmed/27835977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brunner, Iris
Skouen, Jan Sture
Hofstad, Håkon
Aßmuss, Jörg
Becker, Frank
Pallesen, Hanne
Thijs, Liselot
Verheyden, Geert
Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content
title Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content
title_full Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content
title_fullStr Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content
title_full_unstemmed Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content
title_short Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content
title_sort is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? an analysis of treatment intensity and content
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27835977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y
work_keys_str_mv AT brunneriris isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT skouenjansture isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT hofstadhakon isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT aßmussjorg isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT beckerfrank isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT pallesenhanne isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT thijsliselot isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent
AT verheydengeert isupperlimbvirtualrealitytrainingmoreintensivethanconventionaltrainingforpatientsinthesubacutephaseafterstrokeananalysisoftreatmentintensityandcontent