Cargando…
Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
AIM: The purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids. METHODS: A systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9 |
_version_ | 1782467172851777536 |
---|---|
author | Stacey, Dawn Légaré, France Lyddiatt, Anne Giguere, Anik M. C. Yoganathan, Manosila Saarimaki, Anton Pardo, Jordi Pardo Rader, Tamara Tugwell, Peter |
author_facet | Stacey, Dawn Légaré, France Lyddiatt, Anne Giguere, Anik M. C. Yoganathan, Manosila Saarimaki, Anton Pardo, Jordi Pardo Rader, Tamara Tugwell, Peter |
author_sort | Stacey, Dawn |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids. METHODS: A systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a prototype according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards; (c) applied the prototype to a Cochrane Review and used an interview-guided survey to evaluate acceptability/usability; (d) created 12 consult decision aids; and (e) used a Delphi process to reach consensus on considerations for creating a consult decision aid. RESULTS: The 1-page prototype includes (a) a title specifying the decision; (b) information on the health condition, options, benefits/harms with probabilities; (c) an explicit values clarification exercise; and (d) questions to screen for decisional conflict. Hyperlinks provide additional information on definitions, probabilities presented graphically, and references. Fourteen Cochrane Consumer Network members and Cochrane Editorial Unit staff participated. Thirteen reported that it would help patient/clinician discussions and were willing to use and/or recommend it. Seven indicated the right amount of information, six not enough, and one too much. Changes to the prototype were more links to definitions, more white space, and details on GRADE evidence ratings. Creating 12 consult decision aids took about 4 h each. We identified ten considerations when selecting Cochrane Reviews for creating consult decision aids. CONCLUSIONS: Using a systematic process, we developed a consult decision aid prototype to be populated with evidence from Cochrane Reviews. It was acceptable and easy to apply. Future studies will evaluate implementation of consult decision aids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5107194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51071942016-11-29 Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype Stacey, Dawn Légaré, France Lyddiatt, Anne Giguere, Anik M. C. Yoganathan, Manosila Saarimaki, Anton Pardo, Jordi Pardo Rader, Tamara Tugwell, Peter Patient Original Research Article AIM: The purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids. METHODS: A systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a prototype according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards; (c) applied the prototype to a Cochrane Review and used an interview-guided survey to evaluate acceptability/usability; (d) created 12 consult decision aids; and (e) used a Delphi process to reach consensus on considerations for creating a consult decision aid. RESULTS: The 1-page prototype includes (a) a title specifying the decision; (b) information on the health condition, options, benefits/harms with probabilities; (c) an explicit values clarification exercise; and (d) questions to screen for decisional conflict. Hyperlinks provide additional information on definitions, probabilities presented graphically, and references. Fourteen Cochrane Consumer Network members and Cochrane Editorial Unit staff participated. Thirteen reported that it would help patient/clinician discussions and were willing to use and/or recommend it. Seven indicated the right amount of information, six not enough, and one too much. Changes to the prototype were more links to definitions, more white space, and details on GRADE evidence ratings. Creating 12 consult decision aids took about 4 h each. We identified ten considerations when selecting Cochrane Reviews for creating consult decision aids. CONCLUSIONS: Using a systematic process, we developed a consult decision aid prototype to be populated with evidence from Cochrane Reviews. It was acceptable and easy to apply. Future studies will evaluate implementation of consult decision aids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-05-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5107194/ /pubmed/27167076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Stacey, Dawn Légaré, France Lyddiatt, Anne Giguere, Anik M. C. Yoganathan, Manosila Saarimaki, Anton Pardo, Jordi Pardo Rader, Tamara Tugwell, Peter Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype |
title | Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype |
title_full | Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype |
title_fullStr | Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype |
title_full_unstemmed | Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype |
title_short | Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype |
title_sort | translating evidence to facilitate shared decision making: development and usability of a consult decision aid prototype |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staceydawn translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT legarefrance translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT lyddiattanne translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT giguereanikmc translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT yoganathanmanosila translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT saarimakianton translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT pardojordipardo translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT radertamara translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype AT tugwellpeter translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype |