Cargando…

Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype

AIM: The purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids. METHODS: A systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stacey, Dawn, Légaré, France, Lyddiatt, Anne, Giguere, Anik M. C., Yoganathan, Manosila, Saarimaki, Anton, Pardo, Jordi Pardo, Rader, Tamara, Tugwell, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9
_version_ 1782467172851777536
author Stacey, Dawn
Légaré, France
Lyddiatt, Anne
Giguere, Anik M. C.
Yoganathan, Manosila
Saarimaki, Anton
Pardo, Jordi Pardo
Rader, Tamara
Tugwell, Peter
author_facet Stacey, Dawn
Légaré, France
Lyddiatt, Anne
Giguere, Anik M. C.
Yoganathan, Manosila
Saarimaki, Anton
Pardo, Jordi Pardo
Rader, Tamara
Tugwell, Peter
author_sort Stacey, Dawn
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids. METHODS: A systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a prototype according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards; (c) applied the prototype to a Cochrane Review and used an interview-guided survey to evaluate acceptability/usability; (d) created 12 consult decision aids; and (e) used a Delphi process to reach consensus on considerations for creating a consult decision aid. RESULTS: The 1-page prototype includes (a) a title specifying the decision; (b) information on the health condition, options, benefits/harms with probabilities; (c) an explicit values clarification exercise; and (d) questions to screen for decisional conflict. Hyperlinks provide additional information on definitions, probabilities presented graphically, and references. Fourteen Cochrane Consumer Network members and Cochrane Editorial Unit staff participated. Thirteen reported that it would help patient/clinician discussions and were willing to use and/or recommend it. Seven indicated the right amount of information, six not enough, and one too much. Changes to the prototype were more links to definitions, more white space, and details on GRADE evidence ratings. Creating 12 consult decision aids took about 4 h each. We identified ten considerations when selecting Cochrane Reviews for creating consult decision aids. CONCLUSIONS: Using a systematic process, we developed a consult decision aid prototype to be populated with evidence from Cochrane Reviews. It was acceptable and easy to apply. Future studies will evaluate implementation of consult decision aids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5107194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51071942016-11-29 Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype Stacey, Dawn Légaré, France Lyddiatt, Anne Giguere, Anik M. C. Yoganathan, Manosila Saarimaki, Anton Pardo, Jordi Pardo Rader, Tamara Tugwell, Peter Patient Original Research Article AIM: The purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids. METHODS: A systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a prototype according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards; (c) applied the prototype to a Cochrane Review and used an interview-guided survey to evaluate acceptability/usability; (d) created 12 consult decision aids; and (e) used a Delphi process to reach consensus on considerations for creating a consult decision aid. RESULTS: The 1-page prototype includes (a) a title specifying the decision; (b) information on the health condition, options, benefits/harms with probabilities; (c) an explicit values clarification exercise; and (d) questions to screen for decisional conflict. Hyperlinks provide additional information on definitions, probabilities presented graphically, and references. Fourteen Cochrane Consumer Network members and Cochrane Editorial Unit staff participated. Thirteen reported that it would help patient/clinician discussions and were willing to use and/or recommend it. Seven indicated the right amount of information, six not enough, and one too much. Changes to the prototype were more links to definitions, more white space, and details on GRADE evidence ratings. Creating 12 consult decision aids took about 4 h each. We identified ten considerations when selecting Cochrane Reviews for creating consult decision aids. CONCLUSIONS: Using a systematic process, we developed a consult decision aid prototype to be populated with evidence from Cochrane Reviews. It was acceptable and easy to apply. Future studies will evaluate implementation of consult decision aids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-05-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5107194/ /pubmed/27167076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Stacey, Dawn
Légaré, France
Lyddiatt, Anne
Giguere, Anik M. C.
Yoganathan, Manosila
Saarimaki, Anton
Pardo, Jordi Pardo
Rader, Tamara
Tugwell, Peter
Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
title Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
title_full Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
title_fullStr Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
title_full_unstemmed Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
title_short Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
title_sort translating evidence to facilitate shared decision making: development and usability of a consult decision aid prototype
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9
work_keys_str_mv AT staceydawn translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT legarefrance translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT lyddiattanne translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT giguereanikmc translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT yoganathanmanosila translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT saarimakianton translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT pardojordipardo translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT radertamara translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype
AT tugwellpeter translatingevidencetofacilitateshareddecisionmakingdevelopmentandusabilityofaconsultdecisionaidprototype