Cargando…
Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues
Auditory attention theories suggest that humans are able to decompose the complex acoustic input into separate auditory streams, which then compete for attentional resources. How this attentional competition is influenced by motivational salience of sounds is, however, not well-understood. Here, we...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27841363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36989 |
_version_ | 1782467278330134528 |
---|---|
author | Asutay, Erkin Västfjäll, Daniel |
author_facet | Asutay, Erkin Västfjäll, Daniel |
author_sort | Asutay, Erkin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Auditory attention theories suggest that humans are able to decompose the complex acoustic input into separate auditory streams, which then compete for attentional resources. How this attentional competition is influenced by motivational salience of sounds is, however, not well-understood. Here, we investigated whether a positive motivational value associated with sounds could bias the attentional selection in an auditory detection task. Participants went through a reward-learning period, where correct attentional selection of one stimulus (CS+) lead to higher rewards compared to another stimulus (CS−). We assessed the impact of reward-learning by comparing perceptual sensitivity before and after the learning period, when CS+ and CS− were presented as distractors for a different target. Performance decreased after reward-learning when CS+ was a distractor, while it increased when CS− was a distractor. Thus, the findings show that sounds that were associated with high rewards captures attention involuntarily. Additionally, when successful inhibition of a particular sound (CS−) was associated with high rewards then it became easier to ignore it. The current findings have important implications for the understanding of the organizing principles of auditory perception and provide, for the first time, clear behavioral evidence for reward-dependent attentional learning in the auditory domain in humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5107919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51079192016-11-22 Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues Asutay, Erkin Västfjäll, Daniel Sci Rep Article Auditory attention theories suggest that humans are able to decompose the complex acoustic input into separate auditory streams, which then compete for attentional resources. How this attentional competition is influenced by motivational salience of sounds is, however, not well-understood. Here, we investigated whether a positive motivational value associated with sounds could bias the attentional selection in an auditory detection task. Participants went through a reward-learning period, where correct attentional selection of one stimulus (CS+) lead to higher rewards compared to another stimulus (CS−). We assessed the impact of reward-learning by comparing perceptual sensitivity before and after the learning period, when CS+ and CS− were presented as distractors for a different target. Performance decreased after reward-learning when CS+ was a distractor, while it increased when CS− was a distractor. Thus, the findings show that sounds that were associated with high rewards captures attention involuntarily. Additionally, when successful inhibition of a particular sound (CS−) was associated with high rewards then it became easier to ignore it. The current findings have important implications for the understanding of the organizing principles of auditory perception and provide, for the first time, clear behavioral evidence for reward-dependent attentional learning in the auditory domain in humans. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5107919/ /pubmed/27841363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36989 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Asutay, Erkin Västfjäll, Daniel Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
title | Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
title_full | Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
title_fullStr | Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
title_full_unstemmed | Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
title_short | Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
title_sort | auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27841363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asutayerkin auditoryattentionalselectionisbiasedbyrewardcues AT vastfjalldaniel auditoryattentionalselectionisbiasedbyrewardcues |