Cargando…

How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase

[Image: see text] Hybrid quantum mechanical–molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations are widely used in studies of enzymatic catalysis. Until recently, it has been cost prohibitive to determine the asymptotic limit of key energetic and structural properties with respect to increasingly large QM regi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulik, Heather J., Zhang, Jianyu, Klinman, Judith P., Martínez, Todd J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07814
_version_ 1782467296745226240
author Kulik, Heather J.
Zhang, Jianyu
Klinman, Judith P.
Martínez, Todd J.
author_facet Kulik, Heather J.
Zhang, Jianyu
Klinman, Judith P.
Martínez, Todd J.
author_sort Kulik, Heather J.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Hybrid quantum mechanical–molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations are widely used in studies of enzymatic catalysis. Until recently, it has been cost prohibitive to determine the asymptotic limit of key energetic and structural properties with respect to increasingly large QM regions. Leveraging recent advances in electronic structure efficiency and accuracy, we investigate catalytic properties in catechol O-methyltransferase, a prototypical methyltransferase critical to human health. Using QM regions ranging in size from reactants-only (64 atoms) to nearly one-third of the entire protein (940 atoms), we show that properties such as the activation energy approach within chemical accuracy of the large-QM asymptotic limits rather slowly, requiring approximately 500–600 atoms if the QM residues are chosen simply by distance from the substrate. This slow approach to asymptotic limit is due to charge transfer from protein residues to the reacting substrates. Our large QM/MM calculations enable identification of charge separation for fragments in the transition state as a key component of enzymatic methyl transfer rate enhancement. We introduce charge shift analysis that reveals the minimum number of protein residues (approximately 11–16 residues or 200–300 atoms for COMT) needed for quantitative agreement with large-QM simulations. The identified residues are not those that would be typically selected using criteria such as chemical intuition or proximity. These results provide a recipe for a more careful determination of QM region sizes in future QM/MM studies of enzymes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5108028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51080282016-11-16 How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase Kulik, Heather J. Zhang, Jianyu Klinman, Judith P. Martínez, Todd J. J Phys Chem B [Image: see text] Hybrid quantum mechanical–molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations are widely used in studies of enzymatic catalysis. Until recently, it has been cost prohibitive to determine the asymptotic limit of key energetic and structural properties with respect to increasingly large QM regions. Leveraging recent advances in electronic structure efficiency and accuracy, we investigate catalytic properties in catechol O-methyltransferase, a prototypical methyltransferase critical to human health. Using QM regions ranging in size from reactants-only (64 atoms) to nearly one-third of the entire protein (940 atoms), we show that properties such as the activation energy approach within chemical accuracy of the large-QM asymptotic limits rather slowly, requiring approximately 500–600 atoms if the QM residues are chosen simply by distance from the substrate. This slow approach to asymptotic limit is due to charge transfer from protein residues to the reacting substrates. Our large QM/MM calculations enable identification of charge separation for fragments in the transition state as a key component of enzymatic methyl transfer rate enhancement. We introduce charge shift analysis that reveals the minimum number of protein residues (approximately 11–16 residues or 200–300 atoms for COMT) needed for quantitative agreement with large-QM simulations. The identified residues are not those that would be typically selected using criteria such as chemical intuition or proximity. These results provide a recipe for a more careful determination of QM region sizes in future QM/MM studies of enzymes. American Chemical Society 2016-10-05 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5108028/ /pubmed/27704827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07814 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Kulik, Heather J.
Zhang, Jianyu
Klinman, Judith P.
Martínez, Todd J.
How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase
title How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase
title_full How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase
title_fullStr How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase
title_full_unstemmed How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase
title_short How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase
title_sort how large should the qm region be in qm/mm calculations? the case of catechol o-methyltransferase
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07814
work_keys_str_mv AT kulikheatherj howlargeshouldtheqmregionbeinqmmmcalculationsthecaseofcatecholomethyltransferase
AT zhangjianyu howlargeshouldtheqmregionbeinqmmmcalculationsthecaseofcatecholomethyltransferase
AT klinmanjudithp howlargeshouldtheqmregionbeinqmmmcalculationsthecaseofcatecholomethyltransferase
AT martineztoddj howlargeshouldtheqmregionbeinqmmmcalculationsthecaseofcatecholomethyltransferase