Cargando…

Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies

Morphological variation between populations of the same species can arise as a response to genetic variation, local environmental conditions, or a combination of both. In this study, I examined small‐scale geographic variation in bill size and body mass in little penguins (Eudyptula minor) across fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Colombelli‐Négrel, Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2516
_version_ 1782467324175974400
author Colombelli‐Négrel, Diane
author_facet Colombelli‐Négrel, Diane
author_sort Colombelli‐Négrel, Diane
collection PubMed
description Morphological variation between populations of the same species can arise as a response to genetic variation, local environmental conditions, or a combination of both. In this study, I examined small‐scale geographic variation in bill size and body mass in little penguins (Eudyptula minor) across five breeding colonies in South Australia separated by <150 km. To help understand patterns driving the differences, I investigated these variations in relation to environmental parameters (air temperature, sea surface temperature, and water depth) and geographic distances between the colonies. I found substantial morphological variation among the colonies for body mass and bill measurements (except bill length). Colonies further located from each other showed greater morphological divergence overall than adjacent colonies. In addition, phenotypic traits were somewhat correlated to environmental parameters. Birds at colonies surrounded by hotter sea surface temperatures were heavier with longer and larger bills. Birds with larger and longer bills were also found at colonies surrounded by shallower waters. Overall, the results suggest that both environmental factors (natural selection) and interpopulation distances (isolation by distance) are causes of phenotypic differentiation between South Australian little penguin colonies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5108249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51082492016-11-22 Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies Colombelli‐Négrel, Diane Ecol Evol Original Research Morphological variation between populations of the same species can arise as a response to genetic variation, local environmental conditions, or a combination of both. In this study, I examined small‐scale geographic variation in bill size and body mass in little penguins (Eudyptula minor) across five breeding colonies in South Australia separated by <150 km. To help understand patterns driving the differences, I investigated these variations in relation to environmental parameters (air temperature, sea surface temperature, and water depth) and geographic distances between the colonies. I found substantial morphological variation among the colonies for body mass and bill measurements (except bill length). Colonies further located from each other showed greater morphological divergence overall than adjacent colonies. In addition, phenotypic traits were somewhat correlated to environmental parameters. Birds at colonies surrounded by hotter sea surface temperatures were heavier with longer and larger bills. Birds with larger and longer bills were also found at colonies surrounded by shallower waters. Overall, the results suggest that both environmental factors (natural selection) and interpopulation distances (isolation by distance) are causes of phenotypic differentiation between South Australian little penguin colonies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5108249/ /pubmed/27878069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2516 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Colombelli‐Négrel, Diane
Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies
title Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies
title_full Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies
title_fullStr Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies
title_full_unstemmed Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies
title_short Both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between South Australian little penguin colonies
title_sort both natural selection and isolation by distance explain phenotypic divergence in bill size and body mass between south australian little penguin colonies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2516
work_keys_str_mv AT colombellinegreldiane bothnaturalselectionandisolationbydistanceexplainphenotypicdivergenceinbillsizeandbodymassbetweensouthaustralianlittlepenguincolonies