Cargando…

Validation of a simplified scatter correction method for 3D brain PET with (15)O

OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography (PET) enables quantitative measurements of various biological functions. Accuracy in data acquisition and processing schemes is a prerequisite for this. The correction of scatter is especially important when a 3D PET scanner is used. The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibaraki, Masanobu, Matsubara, Keisuke, Sato, Kaoru, Mizuta, Tetsuro, Kinoshita, Toshibumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27534771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-016-1114-7
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography (PET) enables quantitative measurements of various biological functions. Accuracy in data acquisition and processing schemes is a prerequisite for this. The correction of scatter is especially important when a 3D PET scanner is used. The aim of this study was to validate the use of a simplified calculation-based scatter correction method for (15)O studies in the brain. METHODS: We applied two scatter correction methods to the same (15)O PET data acquired from patients with cerebrovascular disease (n = 10): a hybrid dual-energy-window scatter correction (reference method), and a deconvolution scatter correction (simplified method). The PET study included three sequential scans for (15)O-CO, (15)O-O(2), and (15)O-H(2)O, from which the following quantitative parameters were calculated, cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen, and oxygen extraction fraction. RESULTS: Both scatter correction methods provided similar reconstruction images with almost identical image noise, although there were slightly greater differences in white-matter regions compared with gray matter regions. These differences were also greater for (15)O-CO than for (15)O-H(2)O and (15)O-O(2). Region of interest analysis of the quantitative parameters demonstrated that the differences were less than 10 % (except for cerebral blood volume in white-matter regions), and the agreement between the methods was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.95 for all the parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The deconvolution scatter correction despite its simplified implementation provided similar results to the hybrid dual-energy-window scatter correction. We consider it suitable for application in a clinical (15)O brain study using a 3D PET scanner.