Cargando…

Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study

PURPOSE: To study the feasibility/toxicity of urethral stenting with the Memokath(®) 028SW stent in patients undergoing prostate implant (PI) for prostate adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An Investigational Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and institutional review bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Samuel T., Angermeier, Kenneth, Klein, Eric A., Reddy, Chandana A., Ulchaker, James C., Stephenson, Andrew, Campbell, Steven, Ciezki, Jay P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877196
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.21038
_version_ 1782467430657818624
author Chao, Samuel T.
Angermeier, Kenneth
Klein, Eric A.
Reddy, Chandana A.
Ulchaker, James C.
Stephenson, Andrew
Campbell, Steven
Ciezki, Jay P.
author_facet Chao, Samuel T.
Angermeier, Kenneth
Klein, Eric A.
Reddy, Chandana A.
Ulchaker, James C.
Stephenson, Andrew
Campbell, Steven
Ciezki, Jay P.
author_sort Chao, Samuel T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the feasibility/toxicity of urethral stenting with the Memokath(®) 028SW stent in patients undergoing prostate implant (PI) for prostate adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An Investigational Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and institutional review board (IRB) approval were obtained. Twenty patients enrolled. Baseline American Urological Association (AUA) score was obtained prior to PI. Follow-up information was obtained with weekly phone calls for the first 12 weeks and biweekly calls for the next 12 weeks to assess toxicity and AUA score. Removal of the stent was planned at six months after PI, or earlier due to excessive toxicity/patient request. RESULTS: Median age was 66.5 years. The median prostate volume was 39 cc (range: 10-90). The median baseline AUA score was 7.5 (range: 1-21). Three patients required intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) within 3 days after PI. No patients required ISC beyond day 3 after PI. The median duration of ISC was 1 day (range: 1-2). AUA scores returned to baseline values 6 weeks after PI. The week 6 AUA score was 10 (range: 4-16). Seven patients (35%) underwent early removal because of patient preference. The reasons were: incontinence (n = 3), discomfort (n = 2), hematuria (n = 1), and obstructive symptoms (n = 1). The median time of stent removal in these patients was 13.9 weeks (range: 0.9-21.4). Thirteen patients (65%) had ISC and/or urinary catheterization post stent removal. Median time for ISC use was 10 days (range: 1-90). CONCLUSIONS: Urethral stenting with Memokath(®) in patients undergoing PI was feasible, but resulted in relatively high rate of urinary incontinence and discomfort. Given the adverse effects experienced by patients of this study, further studies should focus only on patients with highest risk of urinary obstruction from PI or those with obstruction needing ISC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5108832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51088322016-11-22 Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study Chao, Samuel T. Angermeier, Kenneth Klein, Eric A. Reddy, Chandana A. Ulchaker, James C. Stephenson, Andrew Campbell, Steven Ciezki, Jay P. J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Article PURPOSE: To study the feasibility/toxicity of urethral stenting with the Memokath(®) 028SW stent in patients undergoing prostate implant (PI) for prostate adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An Investigational Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and institutional review board (IRB) approval were obtained. Twenty patients enrolled. Baseline American Urological Association (AUA) score was obtained prior to PI. Follow-up information was obtained with weekly phone calls for the first 12 weeks and biweekly calls for the next 12 weeks to assess toxicity and AUA score. Removal of the stent was planned at six months after PI, or earlier due to excessive toxicity/patient request. RESULTS: Median age was 66.5 years. The median prostate volume was 39 cc (range: 10-90). The median baseline AUA score was 7.5 (range: 1-21). Three patients required intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) within 3 days after PI. No patients required ISC beyond day 3 after PI. The median duration of ISC was 1 day (range: 1-2). AUA scores returned to baseline values 6 weeks after PI. The week 6 AUA score was 10 (range: 4-16). Seven patients (35%) underwent early removal because of patient preference. The reasons were: incontinence (n = 3), discomfort (n = 2), hematuria (n = 1), and obstructive symptoms (n = 1). The median time of stent removal in these patients was 13.9 weeks (range: 0.9-21.4). Thirteen patients (65%) had ISC and/or urinary catheterization post stent removal. Median time for ISC use was 10 days (range: 1-90). CONCLUSIONS: Urethral stenting with Memokath(®) in patients undergoing PI was feasible, but resulted in relatively high rate of urinary incontinence and discomfort. Given the adverse effects experienced by patients of this study, further studies should focus only on patients with highest risk of urinary obstruction from PI or those with obstruction needing ISC. Termedia Publishing House 2011-03-31 2011-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5108832/ /pubmed/27877196 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.21038 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chao, Samuel T.
Angermeier, Kenneth
Klein, Eric A.
Reddy, Chandana A.
Ulchaker, James C.
Stephenson, Andrew
Campbell, Steven
Ciezki, Jay P.
Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study
title Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study
title_full Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study
title_fullStr Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study
title_short Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath(®) 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)I seed implants: phase I/II study
title_sort prophylactic urethral stenting with memokath(®) 028sw in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate (125)i seed implants: phase i/ii study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877196
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.21038
work_keys_str_mv AT chaosamuelt prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT angermeierkenneth prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT kleinerica prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT reddychandanaa prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT ulchakerjamesc prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT stephensonandrew prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT campbellsteven prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy
AT ciezkijayp prophylacticurethralstentingwithmemokath028swinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingprostate125iseedimplantsphaseiiistudy