Cargando…
Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model
BACKGROUND: One of the main challenges in skin flap surgery is tissue ischemia and following necrosis. The present study compares the effects of fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 on increasing cutaneous vasculature, improving ischemia, and preventing distal necrosis in ischemic skin flaps in rat mod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853691 |
_version_ | 1782467529018441728 |
---|---|
author | Fayazzadeh, Ehsan Yavarifar, Hana Rafie, Seyyed Reza Motamed, Sadrollah Sotoudeh Anvari, Maryam Boroumand, Mohammad Ali |
author_facet | Fayazzadeh, Ehsan Yavarifar, Hana Rafie, Seyyed Reza Motamed, Sadrollah Sotoudeh Anvari, Maryam Boroumand, Mohammad Ali |
author_sort | Fayazzadeh, Ehsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One of the main challenges in skin flap surgery is tissue ischemia and following necrosis. The present study compares the effects of fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 on increasing cutaneous vasculature, improving ischemia, and preventing distal necrosis in ischemic skin flaps in rat model. METHODS: Thirty rats were allocated into 3 groups (n=10) and 2×8 cm dorsal random-pattern skin flaps were raised after four daily subdermal injections of normal saline (control group), fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF-1 group; 2.5 µg/day), or fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2 group; 2.5 µg/day) at designated flap areas. Skin flap viability and number of blood vessels were evaluated on day 10 after elevation by planimetric analysis and histological examination. RESULTS: It was shown that administrations of FGF-1 and FGF-2 significantly decreased the percentage of flap necrosis and improved the percentage of ischemic survivable area, compared to the control samples. Meanwhile, the differences between these factors in terms of preventing skin flap necrosis and improving ischemia were also significant. The number of visible blood vessel sections was also higher in FGF-1 and FGF-2 groups than in the control group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, while FGF-2 is still much more potent than FGF-1, treatment with either of these drugs could be very effective in increasing the survival of surgical flaps at risk (length to width ratio>3) in situations that other therapeutic options could not be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5109389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51093892016-11-16 Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model Fayazzadeh, Ehsan Yavarifar, Hana Rafie, Seyyed Reza Motamed, Sadrollah Sotoudeh Anvari, Maryam Boroumand, Mohammad Ali World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: One of the main challenges in skin flap surgery is tissue ischemia and following necrosis. The present study compares the effects of fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 on increasing cutaneous vasculature, improving ischemia, and preventing distal necrosis in ischemic skin flaps in rat model. METHODS: Thirty rats were allocated into 3 groups (n=10) and 2×8 cm dorsal random-pattern skin flaps were raised after four daily subdermal injections of normal saline (control group), fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF-1 group; 2.5 µg/day), or fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2 group; 2.5 µg/day) at designated flap areas. Skin flap viability and number of blood vessels were evaluated on day 10 after elevation by planimetric analysis and histological examination. RESULTS: It was shown that administrations of FGF-1 and FGF-2 significantly decreased the percentage of flap necrosis and improved the percentage of ischemic survivable area, compared to the control samples. Meanwhile, the differences between these factors in terms of preventing skin flap necrosis and improving ischemia were also significant. The number of visible blood vessel sections was also higher in FGF-1 and FGF-2 groups than in the control group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, while FGF-2 is still much more potent than FGF-1, treatment with either of these drugs could be very effective in increasing the survival of surgical flaps at risk (length to width ratio>3) in situations that other therapeutic options could not be considered. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5109389/ /pubmed/27853691 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fayazzadeh, Ehsan Yavarifar, Hana Rafie, Seyyed Reza Motamed, Sadrollah Sotoudeh Anvari, Maryam Boroumand, Mohammad Ali Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model |
title | Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model |
title_full | Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model |
title_fullStr | Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model |
title_short | Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 vs. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in Ischemic Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Animal Model |
title_sort | fibroblast growth factor-1 vs. fibroblast growth factor-2 in ischemic skin flap survival in a rat animal model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fayazzadehehsan fibroblastgrowthfactor1vsfibroblastgrowthfactor2inischemicskinflapsurvivalinaratanimalmodel AT yavarifarhana fibroblastgrowthfactor1vsfibroblastgrowthfactor2inischemicskinflapsurvivalinaratanimalmodel AT rafieseyyedreza fibroblastgrowthfactor1vsfibroblastgrowthfactor2inischemicskinflapsurvivalinaratanimalmodel AT motamedsadrollah fibroblastgrowthfactor1vsfibroblastgrowthfactor2inischemicskinflapsurvivalinaratanimalmodel AT sotoudehanvarimaryam fibroblastgrowthfactor1vsfibroblastgrowthfactor2inischemicskinflapsurvivalinaratanimalmodel AT boroumandmohammadali fibroblastgrowthfactor1vsfibroblastgrowthfactor2inischemicskinflapsurvivalinaratanimalmodel |