Cargando…
Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Frailty is an aggregate expression of susceptibility to poor outcomes, owing to age-, and disease-related deficits that accumulate within multiple domains. Older patients who are frail before surgery are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and use a disproportionately high a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0276-0 |
_version_ | 1782467573719236608 |
---|---|
author | McIsaac, Daniel I. Taljaard, Monica Bryson, Gregory L. Beaule, Paul E. Gagne, Sylvain Hamilton, Gavin Hladkowicz, Emily Huang, Allen Joanisse, John Lavallée, Luke T. Moloo, Hussein Thavorn, Kednapa van Walraven, Carl Yang, Homer Forster, Alan J. |
author_facet | McIsaac, Daniel I. Taljaard, Monica Bryson, Gregory L. Beaule, Paul E. Gagne, Sylvain Hamilton, Gavin Hladkowicz, Emily Huang, Allen Joanisse, John Lavallée, Luke T. Moloo, Hussein Thavorn, Kednapa van Walraven, Carl Yang, Homer Forster, Alan J. |
author_sort | McIsaac, Daniel I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frailty is an aggregate expression of susceptibility to poor outcomes, owing to age-, and disease-related deficits that accumulate within multiple domains. Older patients who are frail before surgery are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and use a disproportionately high amount of healthcare resources. While frailty is now a well-established risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes, the perioperative literature lacks studies that: 1) compare the predictive accuracy of different frailty instruments; 2) consider the impact of frailty on patient-reported outcome measures; and 3) consider the acceptability and feasibility of using frailty instruments in clinical practice. METHODS: We will conduct a multicenter prospective cohort study comparing the predictive accuracy of the modified Fried Index (mFI) with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) among consenting patients aged 65 years and older having elective major non-cardiac surgery. The primary outcome will be disability free survival at 90 days after surgery, a patient-reported outcome measure. Secondary outcomes will include complications, length of stay, discharge disposition, readmission and total health system costs. We will compare the accuracy of frailty instruments using the relative true positive rate and relative false positive rate. These measures can be interpreted as the relative difference in the probability of one instrument identifying a true case of death or new disability compared to another instrument, or the relative difference in the probability of one instrument identifying a false case of death or new disability, respectively. We will also assess the acceptability and feasibility of each instrument. DISCUSSION: Frailty is an important prognostic factor in the growing population of older patients having surgery. This study will provide novel findings regarding the choice of an accurate, clinically useable frailty instrument in predicting patient reported outcomes, as well as morbidity, mortality and resource use. These findings will inform current practice and future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5109639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51096392016-11-28 Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study McIsaac, Daniel I. Taljaard, Monica Bryson, Gregory L. Beaule, Paul E. Gagne, Sylvain Hamilton, Gavin Hladkowicz, Emily Huang, Allen Joanisse, John Lavallée, Luke T. Moloo, Hussein Thavorn, Kednapa van Walraven, Carl Yang, Homer Forster, Alan J. BMC Anesthesiol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Frailty is an aggregate expression of susceptibility to poor outcomes, owing to age-, and disease-related deficits that accumulate within multiple domains. Older patients who are frail before surgery are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and use a disproportionately high amount of healthcare resources. While frailty is now a well-established risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes, the perioperative literature lacks studies that: 1) compare the predictive accuracy of different frailty instruments; 2) consider the impact of frailty on patient-reported outcome measures; and 3) consider the acceptability and feasibility of using frailty instruments in clinical practice. METHODS: We will conduct a multicenter prospective cohort study comparing the predictive accuracy of the modified Fried Index (mFI) with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) among consenting patients aged 65 years and older having elective major non-cardiac surgery. The primary outcome will be disability free survival at 90 days after surgery, a patient-reported outcome measure. Secondary outcomes will include complications, length of stay, discharge disposition, readmission and total health system costs. We will compare the accuracy of frailty instruments using the relative true positive rate and relative false positive rate. These measures can be interpreted as the relative difference in the probability of one instrument identifying a true case of death or new disability compared to another instrument, or the relative difference in the probability of one instrument identifying a false case of death or new disability, respectively. We will also assess the acceptability and feasibility of each instrument. DISCUSSION: Frailty is an important prognostic factor in the growing population of older patients having surgery. This study will provide novel findings regarding the choice of an accurate, clinically useable frailty instrument in predicting patient reported outcomes, as well as morbidity, mortality and resource use. These findings will inform current practice and future research. BioMed Central 2016-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5109639/ /pubmed/27842511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0276-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol McIsaac, Daniel I. Taljaard, Monica Bryson, Gregory L. Beaule, Paul E. Gagne, Sylvain Hamilton, Gavin Hladkowicz, Emily Huang, Allen Joanisse, John Lavallée, Luke T. Moloo, Hussein Thavorn, Kednapa van Walraven, Carl Yang, Homer Forster, Alan J. Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
title | Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0276-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcisaacdanieli comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT taljaardmonica comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT brysongregoryl comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT beaulepaule comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT gagnesylvain comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT hamiltongavin comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT hladkowiczemily comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT huangallen comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT joanissejohn comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT lavalleeluket comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT moloohussein comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT thavornkednapa comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT vanwalravencarl comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT yanghomer comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy AT forsteralanj comparativeassessmentoftwofrailtyinstrumentsforriskstratificationinelderlysurgicalpatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy |