Cargando…

Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations

There is growing recognition that immunotherapy is likely to significantly improve health outcomes for cancer patients in the coming years. Currently, while a subset of patients experience substantial clinical benefit in response to different immunotherapeutic approaches, the majority of patients do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobbin, Kevin K., Cesano, Alessandra, Alvarez, John, Hawtin, Rachael, Janetzki, Sylvia, Kirsch, Ilan, Masucci, Giuseppe V., Robbins, Paul B., Selvan, Senthamil R., Streicher, Howard Z., Zhang, Jenny, Butterfield, Lisa H., Thurin, Magdalena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0179-0
_version_ 1782467576953044992
author Dobbin, Kevin K.
Cesano, Alessandra
Alvarez, John
Hawtin, Rachael
Janetzki, Sylvia
Kirsch, Ilan
Masucci, Giuseppe V.
Robbins, Paul B.
Selvan, Senthamil R.
Streicher, Howard Z.
Zhang, Jenny
Butterfield, Lisa H.
Thurin, Magdalena
author_facet Dobbin, Kevin K.
Cesano, Alessandra
Alvarez, John
Hawtin, Rachael
Janetzki, Sylvia
Kirsch, Ilan
Masucci, Giuseppe V.
Robbins, Paul B.
Selvan, Senthamil R.
Streicher, Howard Z.
Zhang, Jenny
Butterfield, Lisa H.
Thurin, Magdalena
author_sort Dobbin, Kevin K.
collection PubMed
description There is growing recognition that immunotherapy is likely to significantly improve health outcomes for cancer patients in the coming years. Currently, while a subset of patients experience substantial clinical benefit in response to different immunotherapeutic approaches, the majority of patients do not but are still exposed to the significant drug toxicities. Therefore, a growing need for the development and clinical use of predictive biomarkers exists in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Predictive cancer biomarkers can be used to identify the patients who are or who are not likely to derive benefit from specific therapeutic approaches. In order to be applicable in a clinical setting, predictive biomarkers must be carefully shepherded through a step-wise, highly regulated developmental process. Volume I of this two-volume document focused on the pre-analytical and analytical phases of the biomarker development process, by providing background, examples and “good practice” recommendations. In the current Volume II, the focus is on the clinical validation, validation of clinical utility and regulatory considerations for biomarker development. Together, this two volume series is meant to provide guidance on the entire biomarker development process, with a particular focus on the unique aspects of developing immune-based biomarkers. Specifically, knowledge about the challenges to clinical validation of predictive biomarkers, which has been gained from numerous successes and failures in other contexts, will be reviewed together with statistical methodological issues related to bias and overfitting. The different trial designs used for the clinical validation of biomarkers will also be discussed, as the selection of clinical metrics and endpoints becomes critical to establish the clinical utility of the biomarker during the clinical validation phase of the biomarker development. Finally, the regulatory aspects of submission of biomarker assays to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as well as regulatory considerations in the European Union will be covered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-016-0179-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5109653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51096532016-11-25 Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations Dobbin, Kevin K. Cesano, Alessandra Alvarez, John Hawtin, Rachael Janetzki, Sylvia Kirsch, Ilan Masucci, Giuseppe V. Robbins, Paul B. Selvan, Senthamil R. Streicher, Howard Z. Zhang, Jenny Butterfield, Lisa H. Thurin, Magdalena J Immunother Cancer Review There is growing recognition that immunotherapy is likely to significantly improve health outcomes for cancer patients in the coming years. Currently, while a subset of patients experience substantial clinical benefit in response to different immunotherapeutic approaches, the majority of patients do not but are still exposed to the significant drug toxicities. Therefore, a growing need for the development and clinical use of predictive biomarkers exists in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Predictive cancer biomarkers can be used to identify the patients who are or who are not likely to derive benefit from specific therapeutic approaches. In order to be applicable in a clinical setting, predictive biomarkers must be carefully shepherded through a step-wise, highly regulated developmental process. Volume I of this two-volume document focused on the pre-analytical and analytical phases of the biomarker development process, by providing background, examples and “good practice” recommendations. In the current Volume II, the focus is on the clinical validation, validation of clinical utility and regulatory considerations for biomarker development. Together, this two volume series is meant to provide guidance on the entire biomarker development process, with a particular focus on the unique aspects of developing immune-based biomarkers. Specifically, knowledge about the challenges to clinical validation of predictive biomarkers, which has been gained from numerous successes and failures in other contexts, will be reviewed together with statistical methodological issues related to bias and overfitting. The different trial designs used for the clinical validation of biomarkers will also be discussed, as the selection of clinical metrics and endpoints becomes critical to establish the clinical utility of the biomarker during the clinical validation phase of the biomarker development. Finally, the regulatory aspects of submission of biomarker assays to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as well as regulatory considerations in the European Union will be covered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-016-0179-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5109653/ /pubmed/27891226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0179-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Dobbin, Kevin K.
Cesano, Alessandra
Alvarez, John
Hawtin, Rachael
Janetzki, Sylvia
Kirsch, Ilan
Masucci, Giuseppe V.
Robbins, Paul B.
Selvan, Senthamil R.
Streicher, Howard Z.
Zhang, Jenny
Butterfield, Lisa H.
Thurin, Magdalena
Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
title Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
title_full Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
title_fullStr Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
title_full_unstemmed Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
title_short Validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: Volume II — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
title_sort validation of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy in cancer: volume ii — clinical validation and regulatory considerations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0179-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dobbinkevink validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT cesanoalessandra validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT alvarezjohn validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT hawtinrachael validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT janetzkisylvia validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT kirschilan validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT masuccigiuseppev validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT robbinspaulb validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT selvansenthamilr validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT streicherhowardz validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT zhangjenny validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT butterfieldlisah validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations
AT thurinmagdalena validationofbiomarkerstopredictresponsetoimmunotherapyincancervolumeiiclinicalvalidationandregulatoryconsiderations