Cargando…

Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIR) for esophageal cancer, organ and target motion is a major challenge for treatment planning due to potential range deviations. This study intends to analyze the impact of intrafractional variations on dosimetric parameters and to identify favourable settin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haefner, M. F., Sterzing, F., Krug, D., Koerber, S. A., Jaekel, O., Debus, J., Haertig, M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0727-2
_version_ 1782467586896691200
author Haefner, M. F.
Sterzing, F.
Krug, D.
Koerber, S. A.
Jaekel, O.
Debus, J.
Haertig, M. M.
author_facet Haefner, M. F.
Sterzing, F.
Krug, D.
Koerber, S. A.
Jaekel, O.
Debus, J.
Haertig, M. M.
author_sort Haefner, M. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIR) for esophageal cancer, organ and target motion is a major challenge for treatment planning due to potential range deviations. This study intends to analyze the impact of intrafractional variations on dosimetric parameters and to identify favourable settings for robust treatment plans. METHODS: We contoured esophageal boost volumes in different organ localizations for four patients and calculated CIR-plans with 13 different beam geometries on a free-breathing CT. Forward calculation of these plans was performed on 4D-CT datasets representing seven different phases of the breathing cycle. Plan quality was assessed for each patient and beam configuration. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was adequate for all settings in the baseline CIR-plans (V(95) > 98% for two-beam geometries, > 94% for one-beam geometries), but reduced on 4D-CT plans (V(95) range 50–95%). Sparing of the organs at risk (OAR) was adequate, but range deviations during the breathing cycle partly caused critical, maximum doses to spinal cord up to 3.5x higher than expected. There was at least one beam configuration for each patient with appropriate plan quality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite intrafractional motion, CIR for esophageal cancer is possible with robust treatment plans when an individually optimized beam setup is selected depending on tumor size and localization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5109696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51096962016-11-25 Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer Haefner, M. F. Sterzing, F. Krug, D. Koerber, S. A. Jaekel, O. Debus, J. Haertig, M. M. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIR) for esophageal cancer, organ and target motion is a major challenge for treatment planning due to potential range deviations. This study intends to analyze the impact of intrafractional variations on dosimetric parameters and to identify favourable settings for robust treatment plans. METHODS: We contoured esophageal boost volumes in different organ localizations for four patients and calculated CIR-plans with 13 different beam geometries on a free-breathing CT. Forward calculation of these plans was performed on 4D-CT datasets representing seven different phases of the breathing cycle. Plan quality was assessed for each patient and beam configuration. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was adequate for all settings in the baseline CIR-plans (V(95) > 98% for two-beam geometries, > 94% for one-beam geometries), but reduced on 4D-CT plans (V(95) range 50–95%). Sparing of the organs at risk (OAR) was adequate, but range deviations during the breathing cycle partly caused critical, maximum doses to spinal cord up to 3.5x higher than expected. There was at least one beam configuration for each patient with appropriate plan quality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite intrafractional motion, CIR for esophageal cancer is possible with robust treatment plans when an individually optimized beam setup is selected depending on tumor size and localization. BioMed Central 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5109696/ /pubmed/27846916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0727-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Haefner, M. F.
Sterzing, F.
Krug, D.
Koerber, S. A.
Jaekel, O.
Debus, J.
Haertig, M. M.
Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
title Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
title_full Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
title_fullStr Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
title_short Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
title_sort intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0727-2
work_keys_str_mv AT haefnermf intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer
AT sterzingf intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer
AT krugd intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer
AT koerbersa intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer
AT jaekelo intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer
AT debusj intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer
AT haertigmm intrafractionaldosevariationandbeamconfigurationincarbonionradiotherapyforesophagealcancer