Cargando…
Inconsistent approaches of the G-BA regarding acceptance of primary study endpoints as being relevant to patients - an analysis of three disease areas: oncological, metabolic, and infectious diseases
BACKGROUND: Previous evaluations of oncological medicines in the German early benefit assessment (EBA) procedure have demonstrated inconsistent acceptance of endpoints by regulatory authorities and the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Accepted standard endpoints for regulatory purposes are frequently...
Autores principales: | Staab, Thomas, Isbary, Georg, Amelung, Volker E., Ruof, Jörg |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1902-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Early Benefit Assessments in Oncology in Germany: How Can a Clinically Relevant Endpoint Not Be Relevant to Patients?
por: Ruof, Jörg, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
por: Dabisch, Inna, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Regarding “Oncology Drug Approvals: Evaluating Endpoints and Evidence in an Era of Breakthrough Therapies”
por: Chabner, Bruce A.
Publicado: (2017) -
Surrogate endpoints in oncology: when are they acceptable for regulatory and clinical decisions, and are they currently overused?
por: Kemp, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
“Market withdrawals” of medicines in Germany after AMNOG: a comparison of HTA ratings and clinical guideline recommendations
por: Staab, Thomas R., et al.
Publicado: (2018)