Cargando…

Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is an effective drug for protecting against adverse haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation. We compared the haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction between continuous intravenous (IV) infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil. METHODS: This prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maruta, Toyoaki, Kodama, Yoshihumi, Tanaka, Ishie, Shirasaka, Tetsuro, Tsuneyoshi, Isao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0275-1
_version_ 1782467599203827712
author Maruta, Toyoaki
Kodama, Yoshihumi
Tanaka, Ishie
Shirasaka, Tetsuro
Tsuneyoshi, Isao
author_facet Maruta, Toyoaki
Kodama, Yoshihumi
Tanaka, Ishie
Shirasaka, Tetsuro
Tsuneyoshi, Isao
author_sort Maruta, Toyoaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is an effective drug for protecting against adverse haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation. We compared the haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction between continuous intravenous (IV) infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, open-label, single-centre study included patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into two groups based on remifentanil administration type: the continuous IV infusion group (Group C) receiving a 0.3-μg/kg/min remifentanil infusion for 5 min followed by a 0.1-μg/kg/min remifentanil infusion, and the IV bolus group (Group B) receiving a combination of two bolus injections of remifentanil (first bolus of 0.4 μg/kg and second bolus of 0.6 μg/kg after 3 min) and 0.1 μg/kg/min remifentanil. General anaesthesia was induced with 1 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium 3 min after remifentanil infusion (Group C) or immediately after the first bolus of remifentanil (Group B). Tracheal intubation was performed 4 min after the injection of propofol and rocuronium. Heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals from baseline (i.e., before induction) to 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled (Group C, 55; Group B, 52). Normotensive patients with no history of antihypertensive medication use were assigned to the normotensive subgroup (41 each in both groups), while those with hypertension but without a history of antihypertensive medication use were assigned to the untreated hypertensive subgroup (Group C vs. B, n = 7 vs. 4). Finally, patients with a history of antihypertensive medication use were assigned to the treated hypertensive subgroup (7 each in both Groups C and B). No differences in heart rate and blood pressure were observed between Groups C and B within each subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction were similar between continuous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil within both normotensive and hypertensive patients with or without medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered with Japanese Clinical Trial Registry “UMIN-CTR” on 20 October 2016 and was given a trial ID number UMIN000024495.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5109752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51097522016-11-28 Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study Maruta, Toyoaki Kodama, Yoshihumi Tanaka, Ishie Shirasaka, Tetsuro Tsuneyoshi, Isao BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is an effective drug for protecting against adverse haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation. We compared the haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction between continuous intravenous (IV) infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, open-label, single-centre study included patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into two groups based on remifentanil administration type: the continuous IV infusion group (Group C) receiving a 0.3-μg/kg/min remifentanil infusion for 5 min followed by a 0.1-μg/kg/min remifentanil infusion, and the IV bolus group (Group B) receiving a combination of two bolus injections of remifentanil (first bolus of 0.4 μg/kg and second bolus of 0.6 μg/kg after 3 min) and 0.1 μg/kg/min remifentanil. General anaesthesia was induced with 1 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium 3 min after remifentanil infusion (Group C) or immediately after the first bolus of remifentanil (Group B). Tracheal intubation was performed 4 min after the injection of propofol and rocuronium. Heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals from baseline (i.e., before induction) to 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled (Group C, 55; Group B, 52). Normotensive patients with no history of antihypertensive medication use were assigned to the normotensive subgroup (41 each in both groups), while those with hypertension but without a history of antihypertensive medication use were assigned to the untreated hypertensive subgroup (Group C vs. B, n = 7 vs. 4). Finally, patients with a history of antihypertensive medication use were assigned to the treated hypertensive subgroup (7 each in both Groups C and B). No differences in heart rate and blood pressure were observed between Groups C and B within each subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction were similar between continuous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil within both normotensive and hypertensive patients with or without medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered with Japanese Clinical Trial Registry “UMIN-CTR” on 20 October 2016 and was given a trial ID number UMIN000024495. BioMed Central 2016-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5109752/ /pubmed/27842499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0275-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maruta, Toyoaki
Kodama, Yoshihumi
Tanaka, Ishie
Shirasaka, Tetsuro
Tsuneyoshi, Isao
Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
title Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
title_full Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
title_short Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
title_sort comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion and two bolus injections of remifentanil on haemodynamic responses during anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomised single-centre study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0275-1
work_keys_str_mv AT marutatoyoaki comparisonoftheeffectofcontinuousintravenousinfusionandtwobolusinjectionsofremifentanilonhaemodynamicresponsesduringanaesthesiainductionaprospectiverandomisedsinglecentrestudy
AT kodamayoshihumi comparisonoftheeffectofcontinuousintravenousinfusionandtwobolusinjectionsofremifentanilonhaemodynamicresponsesduringanaesthesiainductionaprospectiverandomisedsinglecentrestudy
AT tanakaishie comparisonoftheeffectofcontinuousintravenousinfusionandtwobolusinjectionsofremifentanilonhaemodynamicresponsesduringanaesthesiainductionaprospectiverandomisedsinglecentrestudy
AT shirasakatetsuro comparisonoftheeffectofcontinuousintravenousinfusionandtwobolusinjectionsofremifentanilonhaemodynamicresponsesduringanaesthesiainductionaprospectiverandomisedsinglecentrestudy
AT tsuneyoshiisao comparisonoftheeffectofcontinuousintravenousinfusionandtwobolusinjectionsofremifentanilonhaemodynamicresponsesduringanaesthesiainductionaprospectiverandomisedsinglecentrestudy