Cargando…
Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) between patients who received 7, 2, or 0 days of preoperative antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.417 |
_version_ | 1782467608520425472 |
---|---|
author | Potretzke, Aaron M. Park, Alyssa M. Bauman, Tyler M. Larson, Jeffrey A. Vetter, Joel M. Benway, Brian M. Desai, Alana C. |
author_facet | Potretzke, Aaron M. Park, Alyssa M. Bauman, Tyler M. Larson, Jeffrey A. Vetter, Joel M. Benway, Brian M. Desai, Alana C. |
author_sort | Potretzke, Aaron M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) between patients who received 7, 2, or 0 days of preoperative antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive PCNLs performed at our institution. Patients with infected preoperative urine cultures were excluded. High-risk patients were defined as those with a history of previous urinary tract infection (UTI), hydronephrosis, or stone size ≥2 cm. Patients were treated with 7, 2, or 0 days of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PCNL. All patients received a single preoperative dose of antibiotics within 60 minutes of the start of surgery. Fisher exact test was used to compare the rate of SIRS by preoperative antibiotic length. RESULTS: Of the 292 patients identified, 138 (47.3%) had sterile urine and met high-risk criteria, of which 27 (19.6%), 39 (28.3%), and 72 (52.2%) received 7, 2, and 0 days of preoperative antibiotics, respectively. The 3 groups were similar in age, sex, and duration of surgery (p>0.05). There was no difference in the rate of SIRS between the groups, with 1 of 27 (3.7%), 2 of 39 (5.1%) and 3 of 72 patients (4.2%) meeting criteria in the 7, 2, and 0 days antibiotic groups (p=~1). CONCLUSIONS: Extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was not found to reduce the risk of SIRS after PCNL in our institutional experience of high-risk patients. For these patients, a single preoperative dose of antibiotics is sufficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5109791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51097912016-11-15 Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Potretzke, Aaron M. Park, Alyssa M. Bauman, Tyler M. Larson, Jeffrey A. Vetter, Joel M. Benway, Brian M. Desai, Alana C. Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) between patients who received 7, 2, or 0 days of preoperative antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive PCNLs performed at our institution. Patients with infected preoperative urine cultures were excluded. High-risk patients were defined as those with a history of previous urinary tract infection (UTI), hydronephrosis, or stone size ≥2 cm. Patients were treated with 7, 2, or 0 days of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PCNL. All patients received a single preoperative dose of antibiotics within 60 minutes of the start of surgery. Fisher exact test was used to compare the rate of SIRS by preoperative antibiotic length. RESULTS: Of the 292 patients identified, 138 (47.3%) had sterile urine and met high-risk criteria, of which 27 (19.6%), 39 (28.3%), and 72 (52.2%) received 7, 2, and 0 days of preoperative antibiotics, respectively. The 3 groups were similar in age, sex, and duration of surgery (p>0.05). There was no difference in the rate of SIRS between the groups, with 1 of 27 (3.7%), 2 of 39 (5.1%) and 3 of 72 patients (4.2%) meeting criteria in the 7, 2, and 0 days antibiotic groups (p=~1). CONCLUSIONS: Extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was not found to reduce the risk of SIRS after PCNL in our institutional experience of high-risk patients. For these patients, a single preoperative dose of antibiotics is sufficient. The Korean Urological Association 2016-11 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5109791/ /pubmed/27847915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.417 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Potretzke, Aaron M. Park, Alyssa M. Bauman, Tyler M. Larson, Jeffrey A. Vetter, Joel M. Benway, Brian M. Desai, Alana C. Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title | Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_full | Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_fullStr | Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_short | Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_sort | is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT potretzkeaaronm isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT parkalyssam isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT baumantylerm isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT larsonjeffreya isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT vetterjoelm isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT benwaybrianm isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT desaialanac isextendedpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisforhighriskpatientsnecessarybeforepercutaneousnephrolithotomy |