Cargando…

Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones

PURPOSE: To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Dong Hyuk, Cho, Kang Su, Ham, Won Sik, Chung, Doo Yong, Kwon, Jong Kyou, Choi, Young Deuk, Lee, Joo Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847914
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408
_version_ 1782467610569342976
author Kang, Dong Hyuk
Cho, Kang Su
Ham, Won Sik
Chung, Doo Yong
Kwon, Jong Kyou
Choi, Young Deuk
Lee, Joo Yong
author_facet Kang, Dong Hyuk
Cho, Kang Su
Ham, Won Sik
Chung, Doo Yong
Kwon, Jong Kyou
Choi, Young Deuk
Lee, Joo Yong
author_sort Kang, Dong Hyuk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4–20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5109799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51097992016-11-15 Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones Kang, Dong Hyuk Cho, Kang Su Ham, Won Sik Chung, Doo Yong Kwon, Jong Kyou Choi, Young Deuk Lee, Joo Yong Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4–20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone. The Korean Urological Association 2016-11 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5109799/ /pubmed/27847914 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Dong Hyuk
Cho, Kang Su
Ham, Won Sik
Chung, Doo Yong
Kwon, Jong Kyou
Choi, Young Deuk
Lee, Joo Yong
Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
title Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
title_full Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
title_fullStr Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
title_full_unstemmed Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
title_short Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
title_sort ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847914
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408
work_keys_str_mv AT kangdonghyuk ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones
AT chokangsu ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones
AT hamwonsik ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones
AT chungdooyong ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones
AT kwonjongkyou ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones
AT choiyoungdeuk ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones
AT leejooyong ureteralstentingcanbeanegativepredictorforsuccessfuloutcomefollowingshockwavelithotripsyinpatientswithureteralstones