Cargando…

Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)

BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) annual scientific meetings are premier forums whereby orthopaedic surgeons are informed of the latest research advances in shoulder and elbow surgery. The purpose of the present study was to assess the Level of evidence (LOE) in the clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kay, Jeffrey, Memon, Muzammil, de SA, Darren, Simunovic, Nicole, Athwal, George S., Bedi, Asheesh, Ayeni, Olufemi R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1334-y
_version_ 1782467611558150144
author Kay, Jeffrey
Memon, Muzammil
de SA, Darren
Simunovic, Nicole
Athwal, George S.
Bedi, Asheesh
Ayeni, Olufemi R.
author_facet Kay, Jeffrey
Memon, Muzammil
de SA, Darren
Simunovic, Nicole
Athwal, George S.
Bedi, Asheesh
Ayeni, Olufemi R.
author_sort Kay, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) annual scientific meetings are premier forums whereby orthopaedic surgeons are informed of the latest research advances in shoulder and elbow surgery. The purpose of the present study was to assess the Level of evidence (LOE) in the clinical papers presented at both the open and closed ASES annual scientific meetings from 2005 to 2014. Secondarily, the study evaluated whether there were any changes in the distribution of LOE over this period of time. METHODS: Two reviewers independently evaluated the abstracts of 532 paper presentations at either the open or closed ASES annual meetings. The independent reviewers first screened the abstracts for clinical evidence and excluded cadaveric, biomechanical, technique, and review studies. The included abstracts were then independently graded for methodological quality using LOE from Level I (highest quality) to IV (lowest quality) based on the classification system created by The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). RESULTS: Overall, 421 presentations were included and graded for LOE. In general, 17% of the presentations were graded level I; 15% level II; 25% level III; and 43% assigned a LOE of IV. Chi-square analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the LOE of presentations at the open and closed ASES meetings combined (p = 0.028) between the years 2005 and 2014. In particular, the proportion of presentations graded as level IV significantly decreased over this period (p = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While most presentations at the ASES annual scientific meetings were of lower LOEs the percentage of level I evidence is greater than that reported at other Orthopaedic meetings. There has been a significant improvement in the LOE of clinical research at open and closed ASES meetings from 2005 to 2014. Specifically, the proportion of level IV studies have dramatically decreased over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5109803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51098032016-11-25 Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014) Kay, Jeffrey Memon, Muzammil de SA, Darren Simunovic, Nicole Athwal, George S. Bedi, Asheesh Ayeni, Olufemi R. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) annual scientific meetings are premier forums whereby orthopaedic surgeons are informed of the latest research advances in shoulder and elbow surgery. The purpose of the present study was to assess the Level of evidence (LOE) in the clinical papers presented at both the open and closed ASES annual scientific meetings from 2005 to 2014. Secondarily, the study evaluated whether there were any changes in the distribution of LOE over this period of time. METHODS: Two reviewers independently evaluated the abstracts of 532 paper presentations at either the open or closed ASES annual meetings. The independent reviewers first screened the abstracts for clinical evidence and excluded cadaveric, biomechanical, technique, and review studies. The included abstracts were then independently graded for methodological quality using LOE from Level I (highest quality) to IV (lowest quality) based on the classification system created by The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). RESULTS: Overall, 421 presentations were included and graded for LOE. In general, 17% of the presentations were graded level I; 15% level II; 25% level III; and 43% assigned a LOE of IV. Chi-square analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the LOE of presentations at the open and closed ASES meetings combined (p = 0.028) between the years 2005 and 2014. In particular, the proportion of presentations graded as level IV significantly decreased over this period (p = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While most presentations at the ASES annual scientific meetings were of lower LOEs the percentage of level I evidence is greater than that reported at other Orthopaedic meetings. There has been a significant improvement in the LOE of clinical research at open and closed ASES meetings from 2005 to 2014. Specifically, the proportion of level IV studies have dramatically decreased over time. BioMed Central 2016-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5109803/ /pubmed/27842528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1334-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kay, Jeffrey
Memon, Muzammil
de SA, Darren
Simunovic, Nicole
Athwal, George S.
Bedi, Asheesh
Ayeni, Olufemi R.
Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
title Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
title_full Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
title_fullStr Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
title_full_unstemmed Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
title_short Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
title_sort level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed american shoulder and elbow surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1334-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kayjeffrey levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014
AT memonmuzammil levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014
AT desadarren levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014
AT simunovicnicole levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014
AT athwalgeorges levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014
AT bediasheesh levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014
AT ayeniolufemir levelofclinicalevidencepresentedattheopenandclosedamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsannualmeetingover10years20052014