Cargando…
Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study
BACKGROUND: The CvLPRIT study showed a trend for improved clinical outcomes in the complete revascularisation (CR) group in those treated with an immediate, as opposed to staged in-hospital approach in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2 |
_version_ | 1782467617674493952 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Jamal N. Nazir, Sheraz A. Greenwood, John P. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. |
author_facet | Khan, Jamal N. Nazir, Sheraz A. Greenwood, John P. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. |
author_sort | Khan, Jamal N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The CvLPRIT study showed a trend for improved clinical outcomes in the complete revascularisation (CR) group in those treated with an immediate, as opposed to staged in-hospital approach in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). We aimed to assess infarct size and left ventricular function in patients undergoing immediate compared with staged CR for multivessel disease at PPCI. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) substudy of CvLPRIT was a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint trial in PPCI patients with multivessel disease. These data refer to a post-hoc analysis in 93 patients randomized to the CR arm (63 immediate, 30 staged) who completed a pre-discharge CMR scan (median 2 and 4 days respectively) after PPCI. The decision to stage non-IRA revascularization was at the discretion of the treating interventional cardiologist. RESULTS: Patients treated with a staged approach had more visible thrombus (26/30 vs. 31/62, p = 0.001), higher SYNTAX score in the IRA (9.5, 8–16 vs. 8.0, 5.5–11, p = 0.04) and a greater incidence of no-reflow (23.3 % vs. 1.6 % p < 0.001) than those treated with immediate CR. After adjustment for confounders, staged patients had larger infarct size (19.7 % [11.7–37.6] vs. 11.6 % [6.8–18.2] of LV Mass, p = 0.012) and lower ejection fraction (42.2 ± 10 % vs. 47.4 ± 9 %, p = 0.019) compared with immediate CR. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients randomized to CR in the CMR substudy of CvLPRIT, those in whom the operator chose to stage revascularization had larger infarct size and lower ejection fraction, which persisted after adjusting for important covariates than those who underwent immediate CR. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess whether immediate CR results in better clinical outcomes than staged CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN70913605, Registered 24th February 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5109831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51098312016-11-28 Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study Khan, Jamal N. Nazir, Sheraz A. Greenwood, John P. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: The CvLPRIT study showed a trend for improved clinical outcomes in the complete revascularisation (CR) group in those treated with an immediate, as opposed to staged in-hospital approach in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). We aimed to assess infarct size and left ventricular function in patients undergoing immediate compared with staged CR for multivessel disease at PPCI. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) substudy of CvLPRIT was a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint trial in PPCI patients with multivessel disease. These data refer to a post-hoc analysis in 93 patients randomized to the CR arm (63 immediate, 30 staged) who completed a pre-discharge CMR scan (median 2 and 4 days respectively) after PPCI. The decision to stage non-IRA revascularization was at the discretion of the treating interventional cardiologist. RESULTS: Patients treated with a staged approach had more visible thrombus (26/30 vs. 31/62, p = 0.001), higher SYNTAX score in the IRA (9.5, 8–16 vs. 8.0, 5.5–11, p = 0.04) and a greater incidence of no-reflow (23.3 % vs. 1.6 % p < 0.001) than those treated with immediate CR. After adjustment for confounders, staged patients had larger infarct size (19.7 % [11.7–37.6] vs. 11.6 % [6.8–18.2] of LV Mass, p = 0.012) and lower ejection fraction (42.2 ± 10 % vs. 47.4 ± 9 %, p = 0.019) compared with immediate CR. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients randomized to CR in the CMR substudy of CvLPRIT, those in whom the operator chose to stage revascularization had larger infarct size and lower ejection fraction, which persisted after adjusting for important covariates than those who underwent immediate CR. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess whether immediate CR results in better clinical outcomes than staged CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN70913605, Registered 24th February 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5109831/ /pubmed/27842548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Khan, Jamal N. Nazir, Sheraz A. Greenwood, John P. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study |
title | Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study |
title_full | Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study |
title_fullStr | Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study |
title_short | Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study |
title_sort | infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with stemi: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery pci subgroups in the cvlprit study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanjamaln infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT nazirsheraza infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT greenwoodjohnp infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT dalbymiles infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT curzennick infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT hetheringtonsimon infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT kellydamianj infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT blackmandaniel infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT ringarne infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT peeblescharles infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT wongjoyce infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT sasikaranthiagarajah infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT flathermarcus infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT swantonhoward infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT gershlickanthonyh infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy AT mccanngerryp infarctsizefollowingcompleterevascularizationinpatientspresentingwithstemiacomparisonofimmediateandstagedinhospitalnoninfarctrelatedarterypcisubgroupsinthecvlpritstudy |