Cargando…
Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men
This study was designed to characterize morphometric sperm subpopulations in normozoospermic men by using different statistical methods and examining their suitability to classify correctly different sperm nuclear morphologies present in human ejaculates. Ejaculates from 21 normozoospermic men were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186872 |
_version_ | 1782467625252552704 |
---|---|
author | Yániz, Jesús L Vicente-Fiel, Sandra Soler, Carles Recreo, Pilar Carretero, Teresa Bono, Araceli Berné, José M Santolaria, Pilar |
author_facet | Yániz, Jesús L Vicente-Fiel, Sandra Soler, Carles Recreo, Pilar Carretero, Teresa Bono, Araceli Berné, José M Santolaria, Pilar |
author_sort | Yániz, Jesús L |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was designed to characterize morphometric sperm subpopulations in normozoospermic men by using different statistical methods and examining their suitability to classify correctly different sperm nuclear morphologies present in human ejaculates. Ejaculates from 21 normozoospermic men were collected for the study. After semen collection and analysis, samples were prepared for morphometric determination. At least 200 spermatozoa per sample were assessed for sperm morphometry by computer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis (CASA-Morph) using fluorescence. Clustering and discriminant procedures were performed to identify sperm subpopulations from the morphometric data obtained. Clustering procedures resulted in the classification of spermatozoa into three morphometric subpopulations (large-round 30.4%, small-round 46.6%, and large-elongated 22.9%). In the second analysis, using discriminant methods, the classification was made independently of size and shape. Three morphological categories according to nuclear size (small <10.90 μm(2), intermediate 10.91–13.07 μm(2), and large >13.07 μm(2)) and four categories were defined on 400 canonical cells (100 × 4) from 10 men according to sperm nuclear shape (oval, pyriform, round, and elongated). Thereafter, the resulting classification functions were used to categorize 4200 spermatozoa from 21 men. Differences in the class distribution were observed among men from both clustering and discriminant procedures. It was concluded that the combination of CASA-Morph fluorescence-based technology with multivariate cluster or discriminant analyses provides new information on the description of different morphometric sperm subpopulations in normal individuals, and that important variations in the distribution of morphometric sperm subpopulations may exist between men, with possible functional implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5109869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51098692016-11-25 Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men Yániz, Jesús L Vicente-Fiel, Sandra Soler, Carles Recreo, Pilar Carretero, Teresa Bono, Araceli Berné, José M Santolaria, Pilar Asian J Androl Invited Original Article This study was designed to characterize morphometric sperm subpopulations in normozoospermic men by using different statistical methods and examining their suitability to classify correctly different sperm nuclear morphologies present in human ejaculates. Ejaculates from 21 normozoospermic men were collected for the study. After semen collection and analysis, samples were prepared for morphometric determination. At least 200 spermatozoa per sample were assessed for sperm morphometry by computer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis (CASA-Morph) using fluorescence. Clustering and discriminant procedures were performed to identify sperm subpopulations from the morphometric data obtained. Clustering procedures resulted in the classification of spermatozoa into three morphometric subpopulations (large-round 30.4%, small-round 46.6%, and large-elongated 22.9%). In the second analysis, using discriminant methods, the classification was made independently of size and shape. Three morphological categories according to nuclear size (small <10.90 μm(2), intermediate 10.91–13.07 μm(2), and large >13.07 μm(2)) and four categories were defined on 400 canonical cells (100 × 4) from 10 men according to sperm nuclear shape (oval, pyriform, round, and elongated). Thereafter, the resulting classification functions were used to categorize 4200 spermatozoa from 21 men. Differences in the class distribution were observed among men from both clustering and discriminant procedures. It was concluded that the combination of CASA-Morph fluorescence-based technology with multivariate cluster or discriminant analyses provides new information on the description of different morphometric sperm subpopulations in normal individuals, and that important variations in the distribution of morphometric sperm subpopulations may exist between men, with possible functional implications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5109869/ /pubmed/27624984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186872 Text en Copyright: © 2016 AJA, SIMM & SJTU http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Invited Original Article Yániz, Jesús L Vicente-Fiel, Sandra Soler, Carles Recreo, Pilar Carretero, Teresa Bono, Araceli Berné, José M Santolaria, Pilar Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
title | Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
title_full | Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
title_short | Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
title_sort | comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men |
topic | Invited Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanizjesusl comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT vicentefielsandra comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT solercarles comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT recreopilar comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT carreteroteresa comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT bonoaraceli comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT bernejosem comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen AT santolariapilar comparisonofdifferentstatisticalapproachestoevaluatemorphometricspermsubpopulationsinmen |