Cargando…

Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa

DNA fragmentation has been shown to be one of the causes of male infertility, particularly related to repeated abortions, and different methods have been developed to analyze it. In the present study, two commercial kits based on the SCD technique (Halosperm(®) and SDFA) were evaluated by the use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeghi, Sara, García-Molina, Almudena, Celma, Ferran, Valverde, Anthony, Fereidounfar, Sogol, Soler, Carles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678463
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186875
_version_ 1782467625935175680
author Sadeghi, Sara
García-Molina, Almudena
Celma, Ferran
Valverde, Anthony
Fereidounfar, Sogol
Soler, Carles
author_facet Sadeghi, Sara
García-Molina, Almudena
Celma, Ferran
Valverde, Anthony
Fereidounfar, Sogol
Soler, Carles
author_sort Sadeghi, Sara
collection PubMed
description DNA fragmentation has been shown to be one of the causes of male infertility, particularly related to repeated abortions, and different methods have been developed to analyze it. In the present study, two commercial kits based on the SCD technique (Halosperm(®) and SDFA) were evaluated by the use of the DNA fragmentation module of the ISAS(®) v1 CASA system. Seven semen samples from volunteers were analyzed. To compare the results between techniques, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Data were used for calculation of Principal Components (two PCs were obtained), and subsequent subpopulations were identified using the Halo, Halo/Core Ratio, and PC data. Results from both kits were significantly different (P < 0.001). In each case, four subpopulations were obtained, independently of the classification method used. The distribution of subpopulations differed depending on the kit used. From the PC data, a discriminant analysis matrix was obtained and a good a posteriori classification was obtained (97.1% for Halosperm and 96.6% for SDFA). The present results are the first approach on morphometric evaluation of DNA fragmentation from the SCD technique. This approach could be used for the future definition of a classification matrix surpassing the current subjective evaluation of this important sperm factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5109872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51098722016-11-25 Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa Sadeghi, Sara García-Molina, Almudena Celma, Ferran Valverde, Anthony Fereidounfar, Sogol Soler, Carles Asian J Androl Invited Original Article DNA fragmentation has been shown to be one of the causes of male infertility, particularly related to repeated abortions, and different methods have been developed to analyze it. In the present study, two commercial kits based on the SCD technique (Halosperm(®) and SDFA) were evaluated by the use of the DNA fragmentation module of the ISAS(®) v1 CASA system. Seven semen samples from volunteers were analyzed. To compare the results between techniques, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Data were used for calculation of Principal Components (two PCs were obtained), and subsequent subpopulations were identified using the Halo, Halo/Core Ratio, and PC data. Results from both kits were significantly different (P < 0.001). In each case, four subpopulations were obtained, independently of the classification method used. The distribution of subpopulations differed depending on the kit used. From the PC data, a discriminant analysis matrix was obtained and a good a posteriori classification was obtained (97.1% for Halosperm and 96.6% for SDFA). The present results are the first approach on morphometric evaluation of DNA fragmentation from the SCD technique. This approach could be used for the future definition of a classification matrix surpassing the current subjective evaluation of this important sperm factor. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5109872/ /pubmed/27678463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186875 Text en Copyright: © 2016 AJA, SIMM & SJTU http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Invited Original Article
Sadeghi, Sara
García-Molina, Almudena
Celma, Ferran
Valverde, Anthony
Fereidounfar, Sogol
Soler, Carles
Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
title Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
title_full Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
title_fullStr Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
title_full_unstemmed Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
title_short Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
title_sort morphometric comparison by the isas(®) casa-dnaf system of two techniques for the evaluation of dna fragmentation in human spermatozoa
topic Invited Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678463
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186875
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghisara morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa
AT garciamolinaalmudena morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa
AT celmaferran morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa
AT valverdeanthony morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa
AT fereidounfarsogol morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa
AT solercarles morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa