Cargando…
Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa
DNA fragmentation has been shown to be one of the causes of male infertility, particularly related to repeated abortions, and different methods have been developed to analyze it. In the present study, two commercial kits based on the SCD technique (Halosperm(®) and SDFA) were evaluated by the use of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186875 |
_version_ | 1782467625935175680 |
---|---|
author | Sadeghi, Sara García-Molina, Almudena Celma, Ferran Valverde, Anthony Fereidounfar, Sogol Soler, Carles |
author_facet | Sadeghi, Sara García-Molina, Almudena Celma, Ferran Valverde, Anthony Fereidounfar, Sogol Soler, Carles |
author_sort | Sadeghi, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA fragmentation has been shown to be one of the causes of male infertility, particularly related to repeated abortions, and different methods have been developed to analyze it. In the present study, two commercial kits based on the SCD technique (Halosperm(®) and SDFA) were evaluated by the use of the DNA fragmentation module of the ISAS(®) v1 CASA system. Seven semen samples from volunteers were analyzed. To compare the results between techniques, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Data were used for calculation of Principal Components (two PCs were obtained), and subsequent subpopulations were identified using the Halo, Halo/Core Ratio, and PC data. Results from both kits were significantly different (P < 0.001). In each case, four subpopulations were obtained, independently of the classification method used. The distribution of subpopulations differed depending on the kit used. From the PC data, a discriminant analysis matrix was obtained and a good a posteriori classification was obtained (97.1% for Halosperm and 96.6% for SDFA). The present results are the first approach on morphometric evaluation of DNA fragmentation from the SCD technique. This approach could be used for the future definition of a classification matrix surpassing the current subjective evaluation of this important sperm factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5109872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51098722016-11-25 Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa Sadeghi, Sara García-Molina, Almudena Celma, Ferran Valverde, Anthony Fereidounfar, Sogol Soler, Carles Asian J Androl Invited Original Article DNA fragmentation has been shown to be one of the causes of male infertility, particularly related to repeated abortions, and different methods have been developed to analyze it. In the present study, two commercial kits based on the SCD technique (Halosperm(®) and SDFA) were evaluated by the use of the DNA fragmentation module of the ISAS(®) v1 CASA system. Seven semen samples from volunteers were analyzed. To compare the results between techniques, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Data were used for calculation of Principal Components (two PCs were obtained), and subsequent subpopulations were identified using the Halo, Halo/Core Ratio, and PC data. Results from both kits were significantly different (P < 0.001). In each case, four subpopulations were obtained, independently of the classification method used. The distribution of subpopulations differed depending on the kit used. From the PC data, a discriminant analysis matrix was obtained and a good a posteriori classification was obtained (97.1% for Halosperm and 96.6% for SDFA). The present results are the first approach on morphometric evaluation of DNA fragmentation from the SCD technique. This approach could be used for the future definition of a classification matrix surpassing the current subjective evaluation of this important sperm factor. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5109872/ /pubmed/27678463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186875 Text en Copyright: © 2016 AJA, SIMM & SJTU http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Invited Original Article Sadeghi, Sara García-Molina, Almudena Celma, Ferran Valverde, Anthony Fereidounfar, Sogol Soler, Carles Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
title | Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
title_full | Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
title_fullStr | Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
title_short | Morphometric comparison by the ISAS(®) CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
title_sort | morphometric comparison by the isas(®) casa-dnaf system of two techniques for the evaluation of dna fragmentation in human spermatozoa |
topic | Invited Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadeghisara morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa AT garciamolinaalmudena morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa AT celmaferran morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa AT valverdeanthony morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa AT fereidounfarsogol morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa AT solercarles morphometriccomparisonbytheisascasadnafsystemoftwotechniquesfortheevaluationofdnafragmentationinhumanspermatozoa |