Cargando…

The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, bioresorbable plates have undergone remarkable development. However, there has been no attendant improvement in their strength, because strength requires thickness, and complications such as palpability are related to the thickness of bioresorbable plate systems. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sukegawa, Shintaro, Kanno, Takahiro, Nagano, Daiki, Shibata, Akane, Sukegawa-Takahashi, Yuka, Furuki, Yoshihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003147
_version_ 1782467677536649216
author Sukegawa, Shintaro
Kanno, Takahiro
Nagano, Daiki
Shibata, Akane
Sukegawa-Takahashi, Yuka
Furuki, Yoshihiko
author_facet Sukegawa, Shintaro
Kanno, Takahiro
Nagano, Daiki
Shibata, Akane
Sukegawa-Takahashi, Yuka
Furuki, Yoshihiko
author_sort Sukegawa, Shintaro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In recent years, bioresorbable plates have undergone remarkable development. However, there has been no attendant improvement in their strength, because strength requires thickness, and complications such as palpability are related to the thickness of bioresorbable plate systems. In this clinical study, we compared the surgical management of zygomatic fractures using newly developed thinner bioresorbable materials or conventional titanium miniplates. METHODS: Twelve patients with zygomatic fractures were randomly divided equally into 2 groups (6 with new bioresorbable osteosynthesis materials and 6 with standard titanium miniplates). Using computed tomography, we evaluated the thickness of the soft tissue and plate at the zygomaticofrontal sutures in each patient with the help of detailed radiographic computed tomography data at 6 months postoperatively. We compared the amount of soft-tissue volume increase between the uninjured healthy and injured operated sides in each patient. RESULTS: Both groups eventually achieved satisfactory healing, with a favorable restoration of form and function and without any complications, including palpability. The amount of soft-tissue volume increase at the operated side relative to the uninjured healthy side using new thin bioresorbable plates was 131.1% (range: 101.5–165.8). On the other hand, that of titanium miniplates was 126.4% (range: 102.2–167.6). There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This newly developed thinner flat-type bioresorbable plate system could be considered clinically useful in the treatment of zygomatic fractures even in easily palpated areas, such as the infraorbital rim or zygomaticofrontal sutures, without any healing differences in skeleton as compared with conventional titanium miniplates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5110331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51103312016-11-23 The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis? Sukegawa, Shintaro Kanno, Takahiro Nagano, Daiki Shibata, Akane Sukegawa-Takahashi, Yuka Furuki, Yoshihiko J Craniofac Surg Clinical Studies INTRODUCTION: In recent years, bioresorbable plates have undergone remarkable development. However, there has been no attendant improvement in their strength, because strength requires thickness, and complications such as palpability are related to the thickness of bioresorbable plate systems. In this clinical study, we compared the surgical management of zygomatic fractures using newly developed thinner bioresorbable materials or conventional titanium miniplates. METHODS: Twelve patients with zygomatic fractures were randomly divided equally into 2 groups (6 with new bioresorbable osteosynthesis materials and 6 with standard titanium miniplates). Using computed tomography, we evaluated the thickness of the soft tissue and plate at the zygomaticofrontal sutures in each patient with the help of detailed radiographic computed tomography data at 6 months postoperatively. We compared the amount of soft-tissue volume increase between the uninjured healthy and injured operated sides in each patient. RESULTS: Both groups eventually achieved satisfactory healing, with a favorable restoration of form and function and without any complications, including palpability. The amount of soft-tissue volume increase at the operated side relative to the uninjured healthy side using new thin bioresorbable plates was 131.1% (range: 101.5–165.8). On the other hand, that of titanium miniplates was 126.4% (range: 102.2–167.6). There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This newly developed thinner flat-type bioresorbable plate system could be considered clinically useful in the treatment of zygomatic fractures even in easily palpated areas, such as the infraorbital rim or zygomaticofrontal sutures, without any healing differences in skeleton as compared with conventional titanium miniplates. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-11 2016-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5110331/ /pubmed/28005767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003147 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Sukegawa, Shintaro
Kanno, Takahiro
Nagano, Daiki
Shibata, Akane
Sukegawa-Takahashi, Yuka
Furuki, Yoshihiko
The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?
title The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?
title_full The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?
title_fullStr The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?
title_short The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis?
title_sort clinical feasibility of newly developed thin flat-type bioresorbable osteosynthesis devices for the internal fixation of zygomatic fractures: is there a difference in healing between bioresorbable materials and titanium osteosynthesis?
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003147
work_keys_str_mv AT sukegawashintaro theclinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT kannotakahiro theclinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT naganodaiki theclinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT shibataakane theclinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT sukegawatakahashiyuka theclinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT furukiyoshihiko theclinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT sukegawashintaro clinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT kannotakahiro clinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT naganodaiki clinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT shibataakane clinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT sukegawatakahashiyuka clinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis
AT furukiyoshihiko clinicalfeasibilityofnewlydevelopedthinflattypebioresorbableosteosynthesisdevicesfortheinternalfixationofzygomaticfracturesisthereadifferenceinhealingbetweenbioresorbablematerialsandtitaniumosteosynthesis