Cargando…
Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review
Migraine causes major health impairment and disability. Psychological interventions offer an addition to pharmacotherapy but they are not currently recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) or available in the National Health Service. We aimed to systematically review evide...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8126-z |
_version_ | 1782467712228786176 |
---|---|
author | Sullivan, Andrew Cousins, Sian Ridsdale, Leone |
author_facet | Sullivan, Andrew Cousins, Sian Ridsdale, Leone |
author_sort | Sullivan, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Migraine causes major health impairment and disability. Psychological interventions offer an addition to pharmacotherapy but they are not currently recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) or available in the National Health Service. We aimed to systematically review evidence on the efficacy of psychological interventions for migraine in adults. A search was done of MEDLINE, psychINFO, http://www.opengrey.eu, the meta-register of controlled trials and bibliographies. Twenty-four papers were included and rated independently by two people using the Yates scale, which has 35 points. Cochrane recommendations are that high quality reports score above the mid-point (18 points). Methods used in 17/24 papers were rated ‘high quality’. However, frequently descriptions of key areas such as randomisation methods were omitted. Eighteen studies measured effects of psychological interventions on headache-related outcomes, fifteen reporting significant improvements, ranging 20–67 %. Interventions also produced improvements in psychological outcomes. Few trials measured or reported improvement in disability or quality of life. We conclude that evidence supports the efficacy of psychological interventions in migraine. Over half of the studies were from the USA, which did not provide universal health care at the time of the study, so it is difficult to generalise results to typical populations in receipt of publically funded health services. We agree with the NICE recommendation that high quality pragmatic randomised controlled trials are needed in the UK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5110589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51105892016-11-29 Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review Sullivan, Andrew Cousins, Sian Ridsdale, Leone J Neurol Review Migraine causes major health impairment and disability. Psychological interventions offer an addition to pharmacotherapy but they are not currently recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) or available in the National Health Service. We aimed to systematically review evidence on the efficacy of psychological interventions for migraine in adults. A search was done of MEDLINE, psychINFO, http://www.opengrey.eu, the meta-register of controlled trials and bibliographies. Twenty-four papers were included and rated independently by two people using the Yates scale, which has 35 points. Cochrane recommendations are that high quality reports score above the mid-point (18 points). Methods used in 17/24 papers were rated ‘high quality’. However, frequently descriptions of key areas such as randomisation methods were omitted. Eighteen studies measured effects of psychological interventions on headache-related outcomes, fifteen reporting significant improvements, ranging 20–67 %. Interventions also produced improvements in psychological outcomes. Few trials measured or reported improvement in disability or quality of life. We conclude that evidence supports the efficacy of psychological interventions in migraine. Over half of the studies were from the USA, which did not provide universal health care at the time of the study, so it is difficult to generalise results to typical populations in receipt of publically funded health services. We agree with the NICE recommendation that high quality pragmatic randomised controlled trials are needed in the UK. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-05-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5110589/ /pubmed/27159991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8126-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Sullivan, Andrew Cousins, Sian Ridsdale, Leone Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
title | Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
title_full | Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
title_short | Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
title_sort | psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8126-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sullivanandrew psychologicalinterventionsformigraineasystematicreview AT cousinssian psychologicalinterventionsformigraineasystematicreview AT ridsdaleleone psychologicalinterventionsformigraineasystematicreview |