Cargando…

External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease

The 3-step falls prediction model (3-step model) that include history of falls, history of freezing of gait and comfortable gait speed <1.1 m/s was suggested as a clinical fall prediction tool in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We aimed to externally validate this model as well as to explore the value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindholm, Beata, Nilsson, Maria H., Hansson, Oskar, Hagell, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8287-9
_version_ 1782467714722299904
author Lindholm, Beata
Nilsson, Maria H.
Hansson, Oskar
Hagell, Peter
author_facet Lindholm, Beata
Nilsson, Maria H.
Hansson, Oskar
Hagell, Peter
author_sort Lindholm, Beata
collection PubMed
description The 3-step falls prediction model (3-step model) that include history of falls, history of freezing of gait and comfortable gait speed <1.1 m/s was suggested as a clinical fall prediction tool in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We aimed to externally validate this model as well as to explore the value of additional predictors in 138 individuals with relatively mild PD. We found the discriminative ability of the 3-step model in identifying fallers to be comparable to previously studies [area under curve (AUC), 0.74; 95 % CI 0.65–0.84] and to be better than that of single predictors (AUC, 0.61–0.69). Extended analyses generated a new model for prediction of falls and near falls (AUC, 0.82; 95 % CI 0.75–0.89) including history of near falls, retropulsion according to the Nutt Retropulsion test (NRT) and tandem gait (TG). This study confirms the value of the 3-step model as a clinical falls prediction tool in relatively mild PD and illustrates that it outperforms the use of single predictors. However, to improve future outcomes, further studies are needed to firmly establish a scoring system and risk categories based on this model. The influence of methodological aspects of data collection also needs to be scrutinized. A new model for prediction of falls and near falls, including history of near falls, TG and retropulsion (NRT) may be considered as an alternative to the 3-step model, but needs to be tested in additional samples before being recommended. Taken together, our observations provide important additions to the evidence base for clinical fall prediction in PD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5110600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51106002016-11-29 External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease Lindholm, Beata Nilsson, Maria H. Hansson, Oskar Hagell, Peter J Neurol Original Communication The 3-step falls prediction model (3-step model) that include history of falls, history of freezing of gait and comfortable gait speed <1.1 m/s was suggested as a clinical fall prediction tool in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We aimed to externally validate this model as well as to explore the value of additional predictors in 138 individuals with relatively mild PD. We found the discriminative ability of the 3-step model in identifying fallers to be comparable to previously studies [area under curve (AUC), 0.74; 95 % CI 0.65–0.84] and to be better than that of single predictors (AUC, 0.61–0.69). Extended analyses generated a new model for prediction of falls and near falls (AUC, 0.82; 95 % CI 0.75–0.89) including history of near falls, retropulsion according to the Nutt Retropulsion test (NRT) and tandem gait (TG). This study confirms the value of the 3-step model as a clinical falls prediction tool in relatively mild PD and illustrates that it outperforms the use of single predictors. However, to improve future outcomes, further studies are needed to firmly establish a scoring system and risk categories based on this model. The influence of methodological aspects of data collection also needs to be scrutinized. A new model for prediction of falls and near falls, including history of near falls, TG and retropulsion (NRT) may be considered as an alternative to the 3-step model, but needs to be tested in additional samples before being recommended. Taken together, our observations provide important additions to the evidence base for clinical fall prediction in PD. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-19 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5110600/ /pubmed/27646115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8287-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Lindholm, Beata
Nilsson, Maria H.
Hansson, Oskar
Hagell, Peter
External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease
title External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease
title_full External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease
title_short External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease
title_sort external validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild parkinson’s disease
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8287-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lindholmbeata externalvalidationofa3stepfallspredictionmodelinmildparkinsonsdisease
AT nilssonmariah externalvalidationofa3stepfallspredictionmodelinmildparkinsonsdisease
AT hanssonoskar externalvalidationofa3stepfallspredictionmodelinmildparkinsonsdisease
AT hagellpeter externalvalidationofa3stepfallspredictionmodelinmildparkinsonsdisease