Cargando…

Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy

Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller-Caspary, Knut, Oppermann, Oliver, Grieb, Tim, Krause, Florian F., Rosenauer, Andreas, Schowalter, Marco, Mehrtens, Thorsten, Beyer, Andreas, Volz, Kerstin, Potapov, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27849001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37146
_version_ 1782467792943972352
author Müller-Caspary, Knut
Oppermann, Oliver
Grieb, Tim
Krause, Florian F.
Rosenauer, Andreas
Schowalter, Marco
Mehrtens, Thorsten
Beyer, Andreas
Volz, Kerstin
Potapov, Pavel
author_facet Müller-Caspary, Knut
Oppermann, Oliver
Grieb, Tim
Krause, Florian F.
Rosenauer, Andreas
Schowalter, Marco
Mehrtens, Thorsten
Beyer, Andreas
Volz, Kerstin
Potapov, Pavel
author_sort Müller-Caspary, Knut
collection PubMed
description Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular resolution. Here we report both a setup to exploit the explicit angular dependence of scattered intensity and applications of angle-resolved STEM to semiconductor nanostructures. Our method is applied to measure nitrogen content and specimen thickness in a GaN(x)As(1−x) layer independently at atomic resolution by evaluating two dedicated angular intervals. We demonstrate contrast formation due to strain and composition in a Si- based metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) with Ge(x)Si(1−x) stressors as a function of the angles used for imaging. To shed light on the validity of current theoretical approaches this data is compared with theory, namely the Rutherford approach and contemporary multislice simulations. Inconsistency is found for the Rutherford model in the whole angular range of 16–255 mrad. Contrary, the multislice simulations are applicable for angles larger than 35 mrad whereas a significant mismatch is observed at lower angles. This limitation of established simulations is discussed particularly on the basis of inelastic scattering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5111052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51110522016-11-23 Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy Müller-Caspary, Knut Oppermann, Oliver Grieb, Tim Krause, Florian F. Rosenauer, Andreas Schowalter, Marco Mehrtens, Thorsten Beyer, Andreas Volz, Kerstin Potapov, Pavel Sci Rep Article Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular resolution. Here we report both a setup to exploit the explicit angular dependence of scattered intensity and applications of angle-resolved STEM to semiconductor nanostructures. Our method is applied to measure nitrogen content and specimen thickness in a GaN(x)As(1−x) layer independently at atomic resolution by evaluating two dedicated angular intervals. We demonstrate contrast formation due to strain and composition in a Si- based metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) with Ge(x)Si(1−x) stressors as a function of the angles used for imaging. To shed light on the validity of current theoretical approaches this data is compared with theory, namely the Rutherford approach and contemporary multislice simulations. Inconsistency is found for the Rutherford model in the whole angular range of 16–255 mrad. Contrary, the multislice simulations are applicable for angles larger than 35 mrad whereas a significant mismatch is observed at lower angles. This limitation of established simulations is discussed particularly on the basis of inelastic scattering. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5111052/ /pubmed/27849001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37146 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Müller-Caspary, Knut
Oppermann, Oliver
Grieb, Tim
Krause, Florian F.
Rosenauer, Andreas
Schowalter, Marco
Mehrtens, Thorsten
Beyer, Andreas
Volz, Kerstin
Potapov, Pavel
Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
title Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
title_full Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
title_fullStr Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
title_short Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
title_sort materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27849001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37146
work_keys_str_mv AT mullercasparyknut materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT oppermannoliver materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT griebtim materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT krauseflorianf materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT rosenauerandreas materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT schowaltermarco materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT mehrtensthorsten materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT beyerandreas materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT volzkerstin materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy
AT potapovpavel materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy