Cargando…
Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27849001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37146 |
_version_ | 1782467792943972352 |
---|---|
author | Müller-Caspary, Knut Oppermann, Oliver Grieb, Tim Krause, Florian F. Rosenauer, Andreas Schowalter, Marco Mehrtens, Thorsten Beyer, Andreas Volz, Kerstin Potapov, Pavel |
author_facet | Müller-Caspary, Knut Oppermann, Oliver Grieb, Tim Krause, Florian F. Rosenauer, Andreas Schowalter, Marco Mehrtens, Thorsten Beyer, Andreas Volz, Kerstin Potapov, Pavel |
author_sort | Müller-Caspary, Knut |
collection | PubMed |
description | Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular resolution. Here we report both a setup to exploit the explicit angular dependence of scattered intensity and applications of angle-resolved STEM to semiconductor nanostructures. Our method is applied to measure nitrogen content and specimen thickness in a GaN(x)As(1−x) layer independently at atomic resolution by evaluating two dedicated angular intervals. We demonstrate contrast formation due to strain and composition in a Si- based metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) with Ge(x)Si(1−x) stressors as a function of the angles used for imaging. To shed light on the validity of current theoretical approaches this data is compared with theory, namely the Rutherford approach and contemporary multislice simulations. Inconsistency is found for the Rutherford model in the whole angular range of 16–255 mrad. Contrary, the multislice simulations are applicable for angles larger than 35 mrad whereas a significant mismatch is observed at lower angles. This limitation of established simulations is discussed particularly on the basis of inelastic scattering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5111052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51110522016-11-23 Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy Müller-Caspary, Knut Oppermann, Oliver Grieb, Tim Krause, Florian F. Rosenauer, Andreas Schowalter, Marco Mehrtens, Thorsten Beyer, Andreas Volz, Kerstin Potapov, Pavel Sci Rep Article Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular resolution. Here we report both a setup to exploit the explicit angular dependence of scattered intensity and applications of angle-resolved STEM to semiconductor nanostructures. Our method is applied to measure nitrogen content and specimen thickness in a GaN(x)As(1−x) layer independently at atomic resolution by evaluating two dedicated angular intervals. We demonstrate contrast formation due to strain and composition in a Si- based metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) with Ge(x)Si(1−x) stressors as a function of the angles used for imaging. To shed light on the validity of current theoretical approaches this data is compared with theory, namely the Rutherford approach and contemporary multislice simulations. Inconsistency is found for the Rutherford model in the whole angular range of 16–255 mrad. Contrary, the multislice simulations are applicable for angles larger than 35 mrad whereas a significant mismatch is observed at lower angles. This limitation of established simulations is discussed particularly on the basis of inelastic scattering. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5111052/ /pubmed/27849001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37146 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Müller-Caspary, Knut Oppermann, Oliver Grieb, Tim Krause, Florian F. Rosenauer, Andreas Schowalter, Marco Mehrtens, Thorsten Beyer, Andreas Volz, Kerstin Potapov, Pavel Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
title | Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
title_full | Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
title_fullStr | Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
title_short | Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
title_sort | materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27849001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullercasparyknut materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT oppermannoliver materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT griebtim materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT krauseflorianf materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT rosenauerandreas materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT schowaltermarco materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT mehrtensthorsten materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT beyerandreas materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT volzkerstin materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy AT potapovpavel materialscharacterisationbyangleresolvedscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy |