Cargando…

Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping

BACKGROUND: Central dialysate fluid delivery systems (CDDS) are used by dialysis centers in Japan, and although these systems are effective at delivering dialysate, they have a complex piping network with numerous sites where contamination can develop. In Japan, cleaning disinfectants have been clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isakozawa, Yutaka, Migita, Heihachi, Takesawa, Shingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878114
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.39332
_version_ 1782467816015790080
author Isakozawa, Yutaka
Migita, Heihachi
Takesawa, Shingo
author_facet Isakozawa, Yutaka
Migita, Heihachi
Takesawa, Shingo
author_sort Isakozawa, Yutaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central dialysate fluid delivery systems (CDDS) are used by dialysis centers in Japan, and although these systems are effective at delivering dialysate, they have a complex piping network with numerous sites where contamination can develop. In Japan, cleaning disinfectants have been clinically evaluated based on endotoxin levels and bacterial counts, but there have been no published studies evaluating the biofilm removal efficacy of these agents at the electron microscope level. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we used electron microscopy to evaluate the effectiveness of various cleaning disinfectants in removing biofilms from hemodialysis piping. METHODS: Liquid nitrogen was used to sever a section of dialysis piping on which a biofilm had formed during clinical use. Sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, and peracetic acid were used at stock-solution concentrations as cleaning disinfectants. These disinfectants were tested at room temperature and when heated (80°C). After cleaning and disinfection, biofilm removal from the surface of the piping was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Sodium hypochlorite did not show good biofilm removal at room temperature or when heated. Acetic acid was more effective at biofilm removal when heated than at room temperature. Peracetic acid was highly effective at biofilm removal at both room temperature and when heated CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning and disinfection using a disinfectant at a high temperature and high concentration effectively removes biofilms from hemodialysis piping. However, long-term exposure to disinfectants may affect the piping material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5111172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51111722016-11-22 Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping Isakozawa, Yutaka Migita, Heihachi Takesawa, Shingo Nephrourol Mon Research Article BACKGROUND: Central dialysate fluid delivery systems (CDDS) are used by dialysis centers in Japan, and although these systems are effective at delivering dialysate, they have a complex piping network with numerous sites where contamination can develop. In Japan, cleaning disinfectants have been clinically evaluated based on endotoxin levels and bacterial counts, but there have been no published studies evaluating the biofilm removal efficacy of these agents at the electron microscope level. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we used electron microscopy to evaluate the effectiveness of various cleaning disinfectants in removing biofilms from hemodialysis piping. METHODS: Liquid nitrogen was used to sever a section of dialysis piping on which a biofilm had formed during clinical use. Sodium hypochlorite, acetic acid, and peracetic acid were used at stock-solution concentrations as cleaning disinfectants. These disinfectants were tested at room temperature and when heated (80°C). After cleaning and disinfection, biofilm removal from the surface of the piping was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Sodium hypochlorite did not show good biofilm removal at room temperature or when heated. Acetic acid was more effective at biofilm removal when heated than at room temperature. Peracetic acid was highly effective at biofilm removal at both room temperature and when heated CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning and disinfection using a disinfectant at a high temperature and high concentration effectively removes biofilms from hemodialysis piping. However, long-term exposure to disinfectants may affect the piping material. Kowsar 2016-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5111172/ /pubmed/27878114 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.39332 Text en Copyright © 2016, Nephrology and Urology Research Center http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Isakozawa, Yutaka
Migita, Heihachi
Takesawa, Shingo
Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping
title Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping
title_full Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping
title_fullStr Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping
title_short Efficacy of Biofilm Removal From Hemodialysis Piping
title_sort efficacy of biofilm removal from hemodialysis piping
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878114
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.39332
work_keys_str_mv AT isakozawayutaka efficacyofbiofilmremovalfromhemodialysispiping
AT migitaheihachi efficacyofbiofilmremovalfromhemodialysispiping
AT takesawashingo efficacyofbiofilmremovalfromhemodialysispiping