Combination therapy only shows short-term superiority over monotherapy on ureteral stent-related symptoms – outcome from a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains on the superiority of combination therapy over monotherapy on ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs). We tend to explore if there is a necessity of combination therapy. METHODS: One hundred cases of unilateral upper urinary tract calculi with stent insertion (pre and post flexible ureteroscopy) were randomized into 4 groups, given non-treatment, solifenacin, tamsulosin or combination respectively. Eight times of follow-ups were given after each insertion. RESULTS: SRSs released spontaneously within 4 days after insertion (p = 0.017) but then stay with no further improvement. Benefit of solifenacin on flank pain started showing after day4 (p = 0.002), which was comparable to that of tamsulosin and combination (p = 0.914 vs 0.195). Combination therapy showed superiority over both monotherapy before day4, but after then solifenacin and tamsulosin showed similar effectiveness with the combination therapy on both bladder pain (p = 0.229 vs 0.394) and urgency (p = 0.813 vs 0.974). No improvement on hematuria or frequency was observed in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy takes effect faster but shows no supervisory after the first few days compared with monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Register on April 17th, 2013 (registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-13003148). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0186-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.