Cargando…

The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures

BACKGROUND: Firefighting is a highly stressful occupation with unique physical challenges, apparel and environments that increase the potential for dehydration. Dehydration leaves the firefighter at risk of harm to their health, safety and performance. The purpose of this review was to critically an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Adam, Pope, Rodney, Orr, Robin Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0152-x
_version_ 1782467828234846208
author Walker, Adam
Pope, Rodney
Orr, Robin Marc
author_facet Walker, Adam
Pope, Rodney
Orr, Robin Marc
author_sort Walker, Adam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Firefighting is a highly stressful occupation with unique physical challenges, apparel and environments that increase the potential for dehydration. Dehydration leaves the firefighter at risk of harm to their health, safety and performance. The purpose of this review was to critically analyse the current literature investigating the impact of fighting ‘live’ fires on firefighter hydration. METHODS: A systematic search was performed of four electronic databases for relevant published studies investigating the impact of live fire suppression on firefighter hydration. Study eligibility was assessed using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black protocol and graded according to the Kennelly grading system. RESULTS: Ten studies met the eligibility criteria for this review. The average score for methodological quality was 55 %, ranging from 50 % (‘fair’ quality) to 61 % (‘good’ quality) with a ‘substantial agreement’ between raters (k = .772). Wildfire suppression was considered in five studies and structural fire suppression in five studies. Results varied across the studies, reflecting variations in outcome measures, hydration protocols and interventions. Three studies reported significant indicators of dehydration resulting from structural fire suppression, while two studies found mixed results, with some measures indicating dehydration and other measures an unchanged hydration status. Three studies found non-significant changes in hydration resulting from wildfire firefighting and two studies found significant improvements in markers of hydration. Ad libitum fluid intake was a common factor across the studies finding no, or less severe, dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence confirms that structural and wildfire firefighting can cause dehydration. Ad libitum drinking may be sufficient to maintain hydration in many wildfire environments but possibly not during intense, longer duration, hot structural fire operations. Future high quality research better quantifying the effects of these influences on the degree of dehydration is required to inform policies and procedures that ensure firefighter health and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5111227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51112272016-11-25 The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures Walker, Adam Pope, Rodney Orr, Robin Marc Ann Occup Environ Med Review BACKGROUND: Firefighting is a highly stressful occupation with unique physical challenges, apparel and environments that increase the potential for dehydration. Dehydration leaves the firefighter at risk of harm to their health, safety and performance. The purpose of this review was to critically analyse the current literature investigating the impact of fighting ‘live’ fires on firefighter hydration. METHODS: A systematic search was performed of four electronic databases for relevant published studies investigating the impact of live fire suppression on firefighter hydration. Study eligibility was assessed using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black protocol and graded according to the Kennelly grading system. RESULTS: Ten studies met the eligibility criteria for this review. The average score for methodological quality was 55 %, ranging from 50 % (‘fair’ quality) to 61 % (‘good’ quality) with a ‘substantial agreement’ between raters (k = .772). Wildfire suppression was considered in five studies and structural fire suppression in five studies. Results varied across the studies, reflecting variations in outcome measures, hydration protocols and interventions. Three studies reported significant indicators of dehydration resulting from structural fire suppression, while two studies found mixed results, with some measures indicating dehydration and other measures an unchanged hydration status. Three studies found non-significant changes in hydration resulting from wildfire firefighting and two studies found significant improvements in markers of hydration. Ad libitum fluid intake was a common factor across the studies finding no, or less severe, dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence confirms that structural and wildfire firefighting can cause dehydration. Ad libitum drinking may be sufficient to maintain hydration in many wildfire environments but possibly not during intense, longer duration, hot structural fire operations. Future high quality research better quantifying the effects of these influences on the degree of dehydration is required to inform policies and procedures that ensure firefighter health and safety. BioMed Central 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5111227/ /pubmed/27891237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0152-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Walker, Adam
Pope, Rodney
Orr, Robin Marc
The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
title The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
title_full The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
title_fullStr The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
title_full_unstemmed The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
title_short The impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
title_sort impact of fire suppression tasks on firefighter hydration: a critical review with consideration of the utility of reported hydration measures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0152-x
work_keys_str_mv AT walkeradam theimpactoffiresuppressiontasksonfirefighterhydrationacriticalreviewwithconsiderationoftheutilityofreportedhydrationmeasures
AT poperodney theimpactoffiresuppressiontasksonfirefighterhydrationacriticalreviewwithconsiderationoftheutilityofreportedhydrationmeasures
AT orrrobinmarc theimpactoffiresuppressiontasksonfirefighterhydrationacriticalreviewwithconsiderationoftheutilityofreportedhydrationmeasures
AT walkeradam impactoffiresuppressiontasksonfirefighterhydrationacriticalreviewwithconsiderationoftheutilityofreportedhydrationmeasures
AT poperodney impactoffiresuppressiontasksonfirefighterhydrationacriticalreviewwithconsiderationoftheutilityofreportedhydrationmeasures
AT orrrobinmarc impactoffiresuppressiontasksonfirefighterhydrationacriticalreviewwithconsiderationoftheutilityofreportedhydrationmeasures