Cargando…

Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Cruciate paralysis is a rare, poorly understood condition of the upper craniovertebral junction that allows for selective paralysis of the upper extremities while sparing the lower extremities. Reported cases are few and best treatment practices remain up for debate. The purpose of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hopkins, Benjamin, Khanna, Ryan, Dahdaleh, Nader S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891037
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.193262
_version_ 1782467850111287296
author Hopkins, Benjamin
Khanna, Ryan
Dahdaleh, Nader S
author_facet Hopkins, Benjamin
Khanna, Ryan
Dahdaleh, Nader S
author_sort Hopkins, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cruciate paralysis is a rare, poorly understood condition of the upper craniovertebral junction that allows for selective paralysis of the upper extremities while sparing the lower extremities. Reported cases are few and best treatment practices remain up for debate. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systemic literature review in an attempt to identify prognostic predictors and outcome trends associated with cases previously reported in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review for all cases using the term “Cruciate Paralysis,” reviewing a total of 37 reported cases. All outcomes were assigned a numerical value based on examination at the last follow-up. These numerical values were further analyzed and tested for statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 37 cases, 78.4% were of traumatic causes. Of these, there were considerably worse outcomes associated with patients over the age of 65 years (P < 0.001). Those patients undergoing surgical treatment showed potentially worse outcomes, with a P value approaching significance at P = 0.08. CONCLUSION: Numerous cases of trauma-associated cruciate paralysis have been reported in the literature; however, there remains a strong need for further study of the condition. While certain risk factors can be elicited from currently reported studies, insignificant data exist to make any sound conclusion concerning whether surgical intervention is always the best method of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5111329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51113292016-11-25 Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review Hopkins, Benjamin Khanna, Ryan Dahdaleh, Nader S J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Case Report OBJECTIVE: Cruciate paralysis is a rare, poorly understood condition of the upper craniovertebral junction that allows for selective paralysis of the upper extremities while sparing the lower extremities. Reported cases are few and best treatment practices remain up for debate. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systemic literature review in an attempt to identify prognostic predictors and outcome trends associated with cases previously reported in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review for all cases using the term “Cruciate Paralysis,” reviewing a total of 37 reported cases. All outcomes were assigned a numerical value based on examination at the last follow-up. These numerical values were further analyzed and tested for statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 37 cases, 78.4% were of traumatic causes. Of these, there were considerably worse outcomes associated with patients over the age of 65 years (P < 0.001). Those patients undergoing surgical treatment showed potentially worse outcomes, with a P value approaching significance at P = 0.08. CONCLUSION: Numerous cases of trauma-associated cruciate paralysis have been reported in the literature; however, there remains a strong need for further study of the condition. While certain risk factors can be elicited from currently reported studies, insignificant data exist to make any sound conclusion concerning whether surgical intervention is always the best method of treatment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5111329/ /pubmed/27891037 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.193262 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Report
Hopkins, Benjamin
Khanna, Ryan
Dahdaleh, Nader S
Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review
title Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review
title_full Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review
title_fullStr Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review
title_short Revisiting cruciate paralysis: A case report and systematic review
title_sort revisiting cruciate paralysis: a case report and systematic review
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891037
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.193262
work_keys_str_mv AT hopkinsbenjamin revisitingcruciateparalysisacasereportandsystematicreview
AT khannaryan revisitingcruciateparalysisacasereportandsystematicreview
AT dahdalehnaders revisitingcruciateparalysisacasereportandsystematicreview