Cargando…
Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved?
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) will remain the predominant cause of death and a major cause of morbidity for the foreseeable future. Consequently, CVD prevention offers the greatest potential for the prevention of premature mortality and the compression of morbidity. DISCUSSION: The 2013 g...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0396-y |
_version_ | 1782467851936858112 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Duncan J. |
author_facet | Campbell, Duncan J. |
author_sort | Campbell, Duncan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) will remain the predominant cause of death and a major cause of morbidity for the foreseeable future. Consequently, CVD prevention offers the greatest potential for the prevention of premature mortality and the compression of morbidity. DISCUSSION: The 2013 guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association expand the eligibility for CVD preventive treatment based on the calculated 10-year CVD risk derived from the pooled cohort equation to all persons who have a 10-year risk of CVD of ≥7.5% as estimated by the pooled cohort equation. Previous analyses show that the use of a uniform 10-year risk threshold of 7.5% for all ages disadvantages younger individuals for whom preventive therapy has most to offer. Here I show that reducing the threshold to 3% in younger adults (women aged <66 years and men aged <56 years) will substantially increase the number of cardiovascular events prevented at a similar number needed to treat to prevent one event. Importantly, this increase in cardiovascular event prevention will occur in individuals with greater life expectancy. CONCLUSION: Reducing the threshold 10-year risk of CVD derived from the pooled cohort equation for CVD preventive treatment to 3% in younger adults (women aged <66 years and men aged <56 years) will more effectively prevent premature mortality and compress morbidity to an older age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5111337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51113372016-11-25 Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? Campbell, Duncan J. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Debate BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) will remain the predominant cause of death and a major cause of morbidity for the foreseeable future. Consequently, CVD prevention offers the greatest potential for the prevention of premature mortality and the compression of morbidity. DISCUSSION: The 2013 guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association expand the eligibility for CVD preventive treatment based on the calculated 10-year CVD risk derived from the pooled cohort equation to all persons who have a 10-year risk of CVD of ≥7.5% as estimated by the pooled cohort equation. Previous analyses show that the use of a uniform 10-year risk threshold of 7.5% for all ages disadvantages younger individuals for whom preventive therapy has most to offer. Here I show that reducing the threshold to 3% in younger adults (women aged <66 years and men aged <56 years) will substantially increase the number of cardiovascular events prevented at a similar number needed to treat to prevent one event. Importantly, this increase in cardiovascular event prevention will occur in individuals with greater life expectancy. CONCLUSION: Reducing the threshold 10-year risk of CVD derived from the pooled cohort equation for CVD preventive treatment to 3% in younger adults (women aged <66 years and men aged <56 years) will more effectively prevent premature mortality and compress morbidity to an older age. BioMed Central 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5111337/ /pubmed/27846796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0396-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Campbell, Duncan J. Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
title | Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
title_full | Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
title_fullStr | Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
title_short | Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
title_sort | can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0396-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellduncanj cancardiovasculardiseaseguidelinesthatadvisetreatmentdecisionsbasedonabsoluteriskbeimproved |