Cargando…

An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica

In this work we assess the most recent estimates of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica, including those from both forward and inverse methods. The assessment is based on a comparison of the estimated uplift rates with a set of elastic‐corrected GPS vertical velocities. These have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín‐Español, Alba, King, Matt A., Zammit‐Mangion, Andrew, Andrews, Stuart B., Moore, Philip, Bamber, Jonathan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27867791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013154
_version_ 1782467863506845696
author Martín‐Español, Alba
King, Matt A.
Zammit‐Mangion, Andrew
Andrews, Stuart B.
Moore, Philip
Bamber, Jonathan L.
author_facet Martín‐Español, Alba
King, Matt A.
Zammit‐Mangion, Andrew
Andrews, Stuart B.
Moore, Philip
Bamber, Jonathan L.
author_sort Martín‐Español, Alba
collection PubMed
description In this work we assess the most recent estimates of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica, including those from both forward and inverse methods. The assessment is based on a comparison of the estimated uplift rates with a set of elastic‐corrected GPS vertical velocities. These have been observed from an extensive GPS network and computed using data over the period 2009–2014. We find systematic underestimations of the observed uplift rates in both inverse and forward methods over specific regions of Antarctica characterized by low mantle viscosities and thin lithosphere, such as the northern Antarctic Peninsula and the Amundsen Sea Embayment, where its recent ice discharge history is likely to be playing a role in current GIA. Uplift estimates for regions where many GIA models have traditionally placed their uplift maxima, such as the margins of Filchner‐Ronne and Ross ice shelves, are found to be overestimated. GIA estimates show large variability over the interior of East Antarctica which results in increased uncertainties on the ice‐sheet mass balance derived from gravimetry methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5111427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51114272016-11-16 An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica Martín‐Español, Alba King, Matt A. Zammit‐Mangion, Andrew Andrews, Stuart B. Moore, Philip Bamber, Jonathan L. J Geophys Res Solid Earth Research Articles In this work we assess the most recent estimates of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica, including those from both forward and inverse methods. The assessment is based on a comparison of the estimated uplift rates with a set of elastic‐corrected GPS vertical velocities. These have been observed from an extensive GPS network and computed using data over the period 2009–2014. We find systematic underestimations of the observed uplift rates in both inverse and forward methods over specific regions of Antarctica characterized by low mantle viscosities and thin lithosphere, such as the northern Antarctic Peninsula and the Amundsen Sea Embayment, where its recent ice discharge history is likely to be playing a role in current GIA. Uplift estimates for regions where many GIA models have traditionally placed their uplift maxima, such as the margins of Filchner‐Ronne and Ross ice shelves, are found to be overestimated. GIA estimates show large variability over the interior of East Antarctica which results in increased uncertainties on the ice‐sheet mass balance derived from gravimetry methods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-29 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5111427/ /pubmed/27867791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013154 Text en ©2016. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Martín‐Español, Alba
King, Matt A.
Zammit‐Mangion, Andrew
Andrews, Stuart B.
Moore, Philip
Bamber, Jonathan L.
An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica
title An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica
title_full An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica
title_fullStr An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica
title_short An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica
title_sort assessment of forward and inverse gia solutions for antarctica
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27867791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013154
work_keys_str_mv AT martinespanolalba anassessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT kingmatta anassessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT zammitmangionandrew anassessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT andrewsstuartb anassessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT moorephilip anassessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT bamberjonathanl anassessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT martinespanolalba assessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT kingmatta assessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT zammitmangionandrew assessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT andrewsstuartb assessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT moorephilip assessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica
AT bamberjonathanl assessmentofforwardandinversegiasolutionsforantarctica