Cargando…

Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison

Model‐based global projections of future land‐use and land‐cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prestele, Reinhard, Alexander, Peter, Rounsevell, Mark D. A., Arneth, Almut, Calvin, Katherine, Doelman, Jonathan, Eitelberg, David A., Engström, Kerstin, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Hasegawa, Tomoko, Havlik, Petr, Humpenöder, Florian, Jain, Atul K., Krisztin, Tamás, Kyle, Page, Meiyappan, Prasanth, Popp, Alexander, Sands, Ronald D., Schaldach, Rüdiger, Schüngel, Jan, Stehfest, Elke, Tabeau, Andrzej, Van Meijl, Hans, Van Vliet, Jasper, Verburg, Peter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337
_version_ 1782467910486196224
author Prestele, Reinhard
Alexander, Peter
Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
Arneth, Almut
Calvin, Katherine
Doelman, Jonathan
Eitelberg, David A.
Engström, Kerstin
Fujimori, Shinichiro
Hasegawa, Tomoko
Havlik, Petr
Humpenöder, Florian
Jain, Atul K.
Krisztin, Tamás
Kyle, Page
Meiyappan, Prasanth
Popp, Alexander
Sands, Ronald D.
Schaldach, Rüdiger
Schüngel, Jan
Stehfest, Elke
Tabeau, Andrzej
Van Meijl, Hans
Van Vliet, Jasper
Verburg, Peter H.
author_facet Prestele, Reinhard
Alexander, Peter
Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
Arneth, Almut
Calvin, Katherine
Doelman, Jonathan
Eitelberg, David A.
Engström, Kerstin
Fujimori, Shinichiro
Hasegawa, Tomoko
Havlik, Petr
Humpenöder, Florian
Jain, Atul K.
Krisztin, Tamás
Kyle, Page
Meiyappan, Prasanth
Popp, Alexander
Sands, Ronald D.
Schaldach, Rüdiger
Schüngel, Jan
Stehfest, Elke
Tabeau, Andrzej
Van Meijl, Hans
Van Vliet, Jasper
Verburg, Peter H.
author_sort Prestele, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description Model‐based global projections of future land‐use and land‐cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms of quantity and allocation of projected changes, which can severely impact the results of environmental assessments. In this study, we identify hotspots of uncertainty, based on 43 simulations from 11 global‐scale LULC change models representing a wide range of assumptions of future biophysical and socioeconomic conditions. We attribute components of uncertainty to input data, model structure, scenario storyline and a residual term, based on a regression analysis and analysis of variance. From this diverse set of models and scenarios, we find that the uncertainty varies, depending on the region and the LULC type under consideration. Hotspots of uncertainty appear mainly at the edges of globally important biomes (e.g., boreal and tropical forests). Our results indicate that an important source of uncertainty in forest and pasture areas originates from different input data applied in the models. Cropland, in contrast, is more consistent among the starting conditions, while variation in the projections gradually increases over time due to diverse scenario assumptions and different modeling approaches. Comparisons at the grid cell level indicate that disagreement is mainly related to LULC type definitions and the individual model allocation schemes. We conclude that improving the quality and consistency of observational data utilized in the modeling process and improving the allocation mechanisms of LULC change models remain important challenges. Current LULC representation in environmental assessments might miss the uncertainty arising from the diversity of LULC change modeling approaches, and many studies ignore the uncertainty in LULC projections in assessments of LULC change impacts on climate, water resources or biodiversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5111780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51117802016-11-16 Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison Prestele, Reinhard Alexander, Peter Rounsevell, Mark D. A. Arneth, Almut Calvin, Katherine Doelman, Jonathan Eitelberg, David A. Engström, Kerstin Fujimori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Tomoko Havlik, Petr Humpenöder, Florian Jain, Atul K. Krisztin, Tamás Kyle, Page Meiyappan, Prasanth Popp, Alexander Sands, Ronald D. Schaldach, Rüdiger Schüngel, Jan Stehfest, Elke Tabeau, Andrzej Van Meijl, Hans Van Vliet, Jasper Verburg, Peter H. Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Model‐based global projections of future land‐use and land‐cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms of quantity and allocation of projected changes, which can severely impact the results of environmental assessments. In this study, we identify hotspots of uncertainty, based on 43 simulations from 11 global‐scale LULC change models representing a wide range of assumptions of future biophysical and socioeconomic conditions. We attribute components of uncertainty to input data, model structure, scenario storyline and a residual term, based on a regression analysis and analysis of variance. From this diverse set of models and scenarios, we find that the uncertainty varies, depending on the region and the LULC type under consideration. Hotspots of uncertainty appear mainly at the edges of globally important biomes (e.g., boreal and tropical forests). Our results indicate that an important source of uncertainty in forest and pasture areas originates from different input data applied in the models. Cropland, in contrast, is more consistent among the starting conditions, while variation in the projections gradually increases over time due to diverse scenario assumptions and different modeling approaches. Comparisons at the grid cell level indicate that disagreement is mainly related to LULC type definitions and the individual model allocation schemes. We conclude that improving the quality and consistency of observational data utilized in the modeling process and improving the allocation mechanisms of LULC change models remain important challenges. Current LULC representation in environmental assessments might miss the uncertainty arising from the diversity of LULC change modeling approaches, and many studies ignore the uncertainty in LULC projections in assessments of LULC change impacts on climate, water resources or biodiversity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-08 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5111780/ /pubmed/27135635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Prestele, Reinhard
Alexander, Peter
Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
Arneth, Almut
Calvin, Katherine
Doelman, Jonathan
Eitelberg, David A.
Engström, Kerstin
Fujimori, Shinichiro
Hasegawa, Tomoko
Havlik, Petr
Humpenöder, Florian
Jain, Atul K.
Krisztin, Tamás
Kyle, Page
Meiyappan, Prasanth
Popp, Alexander
Sands, Ronald D.
Schaldach, Rüdiger
Schüngel, Jan
Stehfest, Elke
Tabeau, Andrzej
Van Meijl, Hans
Van Vliet, Jasper
Verburg, Peter H.
Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
title Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
title_full Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
title_fullStr Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
title_full_unstemmed Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
title_short Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
title_sort hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337
work_keys_str_mv AT prestelereinhard hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT alexanderpeter hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT rounsevellmarkda hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT arnethalmut hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT calvinkatherine hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT doelmanjonathan hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT eitelbergdavida hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT engstromkerstin hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT fujimorishinichiro hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT hasegawatomoko hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT havlikpetr hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT humpenoderflorian hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT jainatulk hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT krisztintamas hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT kylepage hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT meiyappanprasanth hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT poppalexander hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT sandsronaldd hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT schaldachrudiger hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT schungeljan hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT stehfestelke hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT tabeauandrzej hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT vanmeijlhans hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT vanvlietjasper hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison
AT verburgpeterh hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison