Cargando…
Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
Model‐based global projections of future land‐use and land‐cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 |
_version_ | 1782467910486196224 |
---|---|
author | Prestele, Reinhard Alexander, Peter Rounsevell, Mark D. A. Arneth, Almut Calvin, Katherine Doelman, Jonathan Eitelberg, David A. Engström, Kerstin Fujimori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Tomoko Havlik, Petr Humpenöder, Florian Jain, Atul K. Krisztin, Tamás Kyle, Page Meiyappan, Prasanth Popp, Alexander Sands, Ronald D. Schaldach, Rüdiger Schüngel, Jan Stehfest, Elke Tabeau, Andrzej Van Meijl, Hans Van Vliet, Jasper Verburg, Peter H. |
author_facet | Prestele, Reinhard Alexander, Peter Rounsevell, Mark D. A. Arneth, Almut Calvin, Katherine Doelman, Jonathan Eitelberg, David A. Engström, Kerstin Fujimori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Tomoko Havlik, Petr Humpenöder, Florian Jain, Atul K. Krisztin, Tamás Kyle, Page Meiyappan, Prasanth Popp, Alexander Sands, Ronald D. Schaldach, Rüdiger Schüngel, Jan Stehfest, Elke Tabeau, Andrzej Van Meijl, Hans Van Vliet, Jasper Verburg, Peter H. |
author_sort | Prestele, Reinhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Model‐based global projections of future land‐use and land‐cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms of quantity and allocation of projected changes, which can severely impact the results of environmental assessments. In this study, we identify hotspots of uncertainty, based on 43 simulations from 11 global‐scale LULC change models representing a wide range of assumptions of future biophysical and socioeconomic conditions. We attribute components of uncertainty to input data, model structure, scenario storyline and a residual term, based on a regression analysis and analysis of variance. From this diverse set of models and scenarios, we find that the uncertainty varies, depending on the region and the LULC type under consideration. Hotspots of uncertainty appear mainly at the edges of globally important biomes (e.g., boreal and tropical forests). Our results indicate that an important source of uncertainty in forest and pasture areas originates from different input data applied in the models. Cropland, in contrast, is more consistent among the starting conditions, while variation in the projections gradually increases over time due to diverse scenario assumptions and different modeling approaches. Comparisons at the grid cell level indicate that disagreement is mainly related to LULC type definitions and the individual model allocation schemes. We conclude that improving the quality and consistency of observational data utilized in the modeling process and improving the allocation mechanisms of LULC change models remain important challenges. Current LULC representation in environmental assessments might miss the uncertainty arising from the diversity of LULC change modeling approaches, and many studies ignore the uncertainty in LULC projections in assessments of LULC change impacts on climate, water resources or biodiversity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5111780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51117802016-11-16 Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison Prestele, Reinhard Alexander, Peter Rounsevell, Mark D. A. Arneth, Almut Calvin, Katherine Doelman, Jonathan Eitelberg, David A. Engström, Kerstin Fujimori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Tomoko Havlik, Petr Humpenöder, Florian Jain, Atul K. Krisztin, Tamás Kyle, Page Meiyappan, Prasanth Popp, Alexander Sands, Ronald D. Schaldach, Rüdiger Schüngel, Jan Stehfest, Elke Tabeau, Andrzej Van Meijl, Hans Van Vliet, Jasper Verburg, Peter H. Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Model‐based global projections of future land‐use and land‐cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms of quantity and allocation of projected changes, which can severely impact the results of environmental assessments. In this study, we identify hotspots of uncertainty, based on 43 simulations from 11 global‐scale LULC change models representing a wide range of assumptions of future biophysical and socioeconomic conditions. We attribute components of uncertainty to input data, model structure, scenario storyline and a residual term, based on a regression analysis and analysis of variance. From this diverse set of models and scenarios, we find that the uncertainty varies, depending on the region and the LULC type under consideration. Hotspots of uncertainty appear mainly at the edges of globally important biomes (e.g., boreal and tropical forests). Our results indicate that an important source of uncertainty in forest and pasture areas originates from different input data applied in the models. Cropland, in contrast, is more consistent among the starting conditions, while variation in the projections gradually increases over time due to diverse scenario assumptions and different modeling approaches. Comparisons at the grid cell level indicate that disagreement is mainly related to LULC type definitions and the individual model allocation schemes. We conclude that improving the quality and consistency of observational data utilized in the modeling process and improving the allocation mechanisms of LULC change models remain important challenges. Current LULC representation in environmental assessments might miss the uncertainty arising from the diversity of LULC change modeling approaches, and many studies ignore the uncertainty in LULC projections in assessments of LULC change impacts on climate, water resources or biodiversity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-08 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5111780/ /pubmed/27135635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Primary Research Articles Prestele, Reinhard Alexander, Peter Rounsevell, Mark D. A. Arneth, Almut Calvin, Katherine Doelman, Jonathan Eitelberg, David A. Engström, Kerstin Fujimori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Tomoko Havlik, Petr Humpenöder, Florian Jain, Atul K. Krisztin, Tamás Kyle, Page Meiyappan, Prasanth Popp, Alexander Sands, Ronald D. Schaldach, Rüdiger Schüngel, Jan Stehfest, Elke Tabeau, Andrzej Van Meijl, Hans Van Vliet, Jasper Verburg, Peter H. Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
title | Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
title_full | Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
title_fullStr | Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
title_short | Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
title_sort | hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison |
topic | Primary Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prestelereinhard hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT alexanderpeter hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT rounsevellmarkda hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT arnethalmut hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT calvinkatherine hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT doelmanjonathan hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT eitelbergdavida hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT engstromkerstin hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT fujimorishinichiro hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT hasegawatomoko hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT havlikpetr hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT humpenoderflorian hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT jainatulk hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT krisztintamas hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT kylepage hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT meiyappanprasanth hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT poppalexander hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT sandsronaldd hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT schaldachrudiger hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT schungeljan hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT stehfestelke hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT tabeauandrzej hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT vanmeijlhans hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT vanvlietjasper hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison AT verburgpeterh hotspotsofuncertaintyinlanduseandlandcoverchangeprojectionsaglobalscalemodelcomparison |