Cargando…

Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression

The active cochlear mechanism amplifies responses to low-intensity sounds, compresses the range of input sound intensities to a smaller output range, and increases cochlear frequency selectivity. The gain of the active mechanism can be modulated by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, cre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fletcher, Mark D., Krumbholz, Katrin, de Boer, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27550069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0574-8
_version_ 1782467950302724096
author Fletcher, Mark D.
Krumbholz, Katrin
de Boer, Jessica
author_facet Fletcher, Mark D.
Krumbholz, Katrin
de Boer, Jessica
author_sort Fletcher, Mark D.
collection PubMed
description The active cochlear mechanism amplifies responses to low-intensity sounds, compresses the range of input sound intensities to a smaller output range, and increases cochlear frequency selectivity. The gain of the active mechanism can be modulated by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, creating the possibility of top-down control at the earliest level of auditory processing. In humans, MOC function has mostly been measured by the suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), typically as a result of MOC activation by a contralateral elicitor sound. The exact relationship between OAE suppression and cochlear gain reduction, however, remains unclear. Here, we measured the effect of a contralateral MOC elicitor on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression, obtained using the established temporal masking curve (TMC) method. The measurements were taken at a signal frequency of 2 kHz and compared with measurements of click-evoked OAE suppression. The elicitor was a broadband noise, set to a sound pressure level of 54 dB to avoid triggering the middle ear muscle reflex. Despite its low level, the elicitor had a significant effect on the TMCs, consistent with a reduction in cochlear gain. The amount of gain reduction was estimated as 4.4 dB on average, corresponding to around 18 % of the without-elicitor gain. As a result, the compression exponent increased from 0.18 to 0.27.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51122142016-11-29 Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression Fletcher, Mark D. Krumbholz, Katrin de Boer, Jessica J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article The active cochlear mechanism amplifies responses to low-intensity sounds, compresses the range of input sound intensities to a smaller output range, and increases cochlear frequency selectivity. The gain of the active mechanism can be modulated by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, creating the possibility of top-down control at the earliest level of auditory processing. In humans, MOC function has mostly been measured by the suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), typically as a result of MOC activation by a contralateral elicitor sound. The exact relationship between OAE suppression and cochlear gain reduction, however, remains unclear. Here, we measured the effect of a contralateral MOC elicitor on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression, obtained using the established temporal masking curve (TMC) method. The measurements were taken at a signal frequency of 2 kHz and compared with measurements of click-evoked OAE suppression. The elicitor was a broadband noise, set to a sound pressure level of 54 dB to avoid triggering the middle ear muscle reflex. Despite its low level, the elicitor had a significant effect on the TMCs, consistent with a reduction in cochlear gain. The amount of gain reduction was estimated as 4.4 dB on average, corresponding to around 18 % of the without-elicitor gain. As a result, the compression exponent increased from 0.18 to 0.27. Springer US 2016-08-22 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5112214/ /pubmed/27550069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0574-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fletcher, Mark D.
Krumbholz, Katrin
de Boer, Jessica
Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression
title Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression
title_full Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression
title_fullStr Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression
title_short Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression
title_sort effect of contralateral medial olivocochlear feedback on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27550069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0574-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fletchermarkd effectofcontralateralmedialolivocochlearfeedbackonperceptualestimatesofcochleargainandcompression
AT krumbholzkatrin effectofcontralateralmedialolivocochlearfeedbackonperceptualestimatesofcochleargainandcompression
AT deboerjessica effectofcontralateralmedialolivocochlearfeedbackonperceptualestimatesofcochleargainandcompression