Cargando…
Evaluation of (18)F-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography ([(18)F]FLT-PET/CT) methodology in assessing early response to chemotherapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer
BACKGROUND: 3’-Deoxy-3’-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) PET has limited utility in abdominal imaging due to high physiological hepatic uptake of a tracer. We evaluated [(18)F]FLT-PET/CT combined with a temporal-intensity information-based voxel-clustering approach termed kinetic spatial filterin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0234-3 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: 3’-Deoxy-3’-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) PET has limited utility in abdominal imaging due to high physiological hepatic uptake of a tracer. We evaluated [(18)F]FLT-PET/CT combined with a temporal-intensity information-based voxel-clustering approach termed kinetic spatial filtering (KSF) to improve tumour visualisation in patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancer and as a marker of early response to chemotherapy. Dynamic [(18)F]FLT-PET/CT data were collected before and 3 weeks post first cycle of chemotherapy. Changes in tumour [(18)F]FLT-PET/CT variables were determined. Response was determined on contrast-enhanced CT after three cycles of therapy using RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. Following application of the KSF, visual distinction of all oesophageal and/or gastric tumours was observed in [(18)F]FLT-PET images. Among the nine patients available for response evaluation (RECIST 1.1), three patients had responded (partial response) and six patients were non-responders (stable disease). There was a significant association between Ki-67 and all baseline [(18)F]FLT-PET parameters. Area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 1 min was associated with treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that application of the KSF allowed accurate visualisation of both primary and metastatic lesions following imaging with the proliferation marker, [(18)F]FLT-PET/CT. However, [(18)F]FLT-PET uptake parameters did not correlate with response. Instead, we observe significant changes in tracer delivery following chemotherapy suggesting that further [(18)F]FLT-PET/CT studies in this tumour type should be undertaken with caution. |
---|