Cargando…
Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4 |
_version_ | 1782467951672164352 |
---|---|
author | Abat, F. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L. Martín-Nogueras, A. M. Calvo-Arenillas, J. I. Yajeya, J. Méndez-Sánchez, R. Monllau, J. C. Gelber, P. E. |
author_facet | Abat, F. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L. Martín-Nogueras, A. M. Calvo-Arenillas, J. I. Yajeya, J. Méndez-Sánchez, R. Monllau, J. C. Gelber, P. E. |
author_sort | Abat, F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to treat patellar tendinopathy. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group 2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis of means and a survival study were performed. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9 to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1 was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5112225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51122252016-12-02 Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy Abat, F. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L. Martín-Nogueras, A. M. Calvo-Arenillas, J. I. Yajeya, J. Méndez-Sánchez, R. Monllau, J. C. Gelber, P. E. J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to treat patellar tendinopathy. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group 2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis of means and a survival study were performed. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9 to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1 was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112225/ /pubmed/27854082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Abat, F. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L. Martín-Nogueras, A. M. Calvo-Arenillas, J. I. Yajeya, J. Méndez-Sánchez, R. Monllau, J. C. Gelber, P. E. Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
title | Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
title_full | Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
title_fullStr | Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
title_short | Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (usget) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abatf randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT sanchezsanchezjl randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT martinnoguerasam randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT calvoarenillasji randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT yajeyaj randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT mendezsanchezr randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT monllaujc randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy AT gelberpe randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy |