Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abat, F., Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L., Martín-Nogueras, A. M., Calvo-Arenillas, J. I., Yajeya, J., Méndez-Sánchez, R., Monllau, J. C., Gelber, P. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4
_version_ 1782467951672164352
author Abat, F.
Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L.
Martín-Nogueras, A. M.
Calvo-Arenillas, J. I.
Yajeya, J.
Méndez-Sánchez, R.
Monllau, J. C.
Gelber, P. E.
author_facet Abat, F.
Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L.
Martín-Nogueras, A. M.
Calvo-Arenillas, J. I.
Yajeya, J.
Méndez-Sánchez, R.
Monllau, J. C.
Gelber, P. E.
author_sort Abat, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to treat patellar tendinopathy. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group 2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis of means and a survival study were performed. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9 to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1 was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51122252016-12-02 Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy Abat, F. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L. Martín-Nogueras, A. M. Calvo-Arenillas, J. I. Yajeya, J. Méndez-Sánchez, R. Monllau, J. C. Gelber, P. E. J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to treat patellar tendinopathy. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group 2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis of means and a survival study were performed. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9 to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1 was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112225/ /pubmed/27854082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Abat, F.
Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L.
Martín-Nogueras, A. M.
Calvo-Arenillas, J. I.
Yajeya, J.
Méndez-Sánchez, R.
Monllau, J. C.
Gelber, P. E.
Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
title Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
title_full Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
title_short Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (usget) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4
work_keys_str_mv AT abatf randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT sanchezsanchezjl randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT martinnoguerasam randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT calvoarenillasji randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT yajeyaj randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT mendezsanchezr randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT monllaujc randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy
AT gelberpe randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessoftheultrasoundguidedgalvanicelectrolysistechniqueusgetversusconventionalelectrophysiotherapeutictreatmentonpatellartendinopathy