Cargando…
Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder sto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4918-6 |
_version_ | 1782467965562650624 |
---|---|
author | Lv, Fujing Zhang, Shutian Ji, Ming Wang, Yongjun Li, Peng Han, Wei |
author_facet | Lv, Fujing Zhang, Shutian Ji, Ming Wang, Yongjun Li, Peng Han, Wei |
author_sort | Lv, Fujing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones from February 2014 to April 2015 were randomized assigned to two groups: 29 patients underwent single-stage surgery with combined duodenoscope, laparoscope and choledochoscope (combined tri-endoscopic group), and 29 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy to remove common bile duct stones followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy several days later (control group). The success rate of complete stone removal, procedure-related complication, hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Altogether, 53 patients (29 patients in combined tri-endoscopic group and 24 patients in control group) successfully underwent the surgery and ERCP procedure. Three patients in the control group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. One case of bile leaking and one case of residual stone were noted in the combined tri-endoscopic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to both complete stone removal [96.6 % (28/29) vs. 100 % (24/24)] and procedure-related complication rate [3.4 % (1/29) vs. 12.5 % (3/24)] (p > 0.05). No open surgery was required in either group. There were significant differences between the two groups with regard to hospital stay (6.72 ± 1.3 days vs. 10.91 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01) and cost of hospitalization (15,724 ± 1613 CNY vs. 19,829 ± 2433 CNY, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The single-stage combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis was just as safe and successful as the control group. In addition, it resulted in a shorter hospital stay and less cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5112286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51122862016-11-29 Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis Lv, Fujing Zhang, Shutian Ji, Ming Wang, Yongjun Li, Peng Han, Wei Surg Endosc Endoluminal Surgery OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones from February 2014 to April 2015 were randomized assigned to two groups: 29 patients underwent single-stage surgery with combined duodenoscope, laparoscope and choledochoscope (combined tri-endoscopic group), and 29 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy to remove common bile duct stones followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy several days later (control group). The success rate of complete stone removal, procedure-related complication, hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Altogether, 53 patients (29 patients in combined tri-endoscopic group and 24 patients in control group) successfully underwent the surgery and ERCP procedure. Three patients in the control group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. One case of bile leaking and one case of residual stone were noted in the combined tri-endoscopic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to both complete stone removal [96.6 % (28/29) vs. 100 % (24/24)] and procedure-related complication rate [3.4 % (1/29) vs. 12.5 % (3/24)] (p > 0.05). No open surgery was required in either group. There were significant differences between the two groups with regard to hospital stay (6.72 ± 1.3 days vs. 10.91 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01) and cost of hospitalization (15,724 ± 1613 CNY vs. 19,829 ± 2433 CNY, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The single-stage combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis was just as safe and successful as the control group. In addition, it resulted in a shorter hospital stay and less cost. Springer US 2016-04-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5112286/ /pubmed/27126621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4918-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Endoluminal Surgery Lv, Fujing Zhang, Shutian Ji, Ming Wang, Yongjun Li, Peng Han, Wei Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
title | Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
title_full | Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
title_fullStr | Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
title_short | Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
title_sort | single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis |
topic | Endoluminal Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4918-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lvfujing singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis AT zhangshutian singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis AT jiming singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis AT wangyongjun singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis AT lipeng singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis AT hanwei singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis |