Cargando…

Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder sto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Fujing, Zhang, Shutian, Ji, Ming, Wang, Yongjun, Li, Peng, Han, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4918-6
_version_ 1782467965562650624
author Lv, Fujing
Zhang, Shutian
Ji, Ming
Wang, Yongjun
Li, Peng
Han, Wei
author_facet Lv, Fujing
Zhang, Shutian
Ji, Ming
Wang, Yongjun
Li, Peng
Han, Wei
author_sort Lv, Fujing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones from February 2014 to April 2015 were randomized assigned to two groups: 29 patients underwent single-stage surgery with combined duodenoscope, laparoscope and choledochoscope (combined tri-endoscopic group), and 29 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy to remove common bile duct stones followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy several days later (control group). The success rate of complete stone removal, procedure-related complication, hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Altogether, 53 patients (29 patients in combined tri-endoscopic group and 24 patients in control group) successfully underwent the surgery and ERCP procedure. Three patients in the control group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. One case of bile leaking and one case of residual stone were noted in the combined tri-endoscopic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to both complete stone removal [96.6 % (28/29) vs. 100 % (24/24)] and procedure-related complication rate [3.4 % (1/29) vs. 12.5 % (3/24)] (p > 0.05). No open surgery was required in either group. There were significant differences between the two groups with regard to hospital stay (6.72 ± 1.3 days vs. 10.91 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01) and cost of hospitalization (15,724 ± 1613 CNY vs. 19,829 ± 2433 CNY, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The single-stage combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis was just as safe and successful as the control group. In addition, it resulted in a shorter hospital stay and less cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51122862016-11-29 Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis Lv, Fujing Zhang, Shutian Ji, Ming Wang, Yongjun Li, Peng Han, Wei Surg Endosc Endoluminal Surgery OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones from February 2014 to April 2015 were randomized assigned to two groups: 29 patients underwent single-stage surgery with combined duodenoscope, laparoscope and choledochoscope (combined tri-endoscopic group), and 29 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy to remove common bile duct stones followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy several days later (control group). The success rate of complete stone removal, procedure-related complication, hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Altogether, 53 patients (29 patients in combined tri-endoscopic group and 24 patients in control group) successfully underwent the surgery and ERCP procedure. Three patients in the control group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. One case of bile leaking and one case of residual stone were noted in the combined tri-endoscopic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to both complete stone removal [96.6 % (28/29) vs. 100 % (24/24)] and procedure-related complication rate [3.4 % (1/29) vs. 12.5 % (3/24)] (p > 0.05). No open surgery was required in either group. There were significant differences between the two groups with regard to hospital stay (6.72 ± 1.3 days vs. 10.91 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01) and cost of hospitalization (15,724 ± 1613 CNY vs. 19,829 ± 2433 CNY, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The single-stage combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis was just as safe and successful as the control group. In addition, it resulted in a shorter hospital stay and less cost. Springer US 2016-04-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5112286/ /pubmed/27126621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4918-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Endoluminal Surgery
Lv, Fujing
Zhang, Shutian
Ji, Ming
Wang, Yongjun
Li, Peng
Han, Wei
Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
title Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
title_full Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
title_fullStr Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
title_short Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
title_sort single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
topic Endoluminal Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4918-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lvfujing singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis
AT zhangshutian singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis
AT jiming singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis
AT wangyongjun singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis
AT lipeng singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis
AT hanwei singlestagemanagementwithcombinedtriendoscopicapproachforconcomitantcholecystolithiasisandcholedocholithiasis