Cargando…

Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors

Savanna fire is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Australia, savanna fire contributes about 3% of annual GHG emissions reportable to the Kyoto Protocol. In order to reduce GHG emissions from savanna burning, the Australian government has developed and approved a Kyoto compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maraseni, Tek Narayan, Reardon-Smith, Kathryn, Griffiths, Greg, Apan, Armando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27909461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0067-4
_version_ 1782467967135514624
author Maraseni, Tek Narayan
Reardon-Smith, Kathryn
Griffiths, Greg
Apan, Armando
author_facet Maraseni, Tek Narayan
Reardon-Smith, Kathryn
Griffiths, Greg
Apan, Armando
author_sort Maraseni, Tek Narayan
collection PubMed
description Savanna fire is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Australia, savanna fire contributes about 3% of annual GHG emissions reportable to the Kyoto Protocol. In order to reduce GHG emissions from savanna burning, the Australian government has developed and approved a Kyoto compliant savanna controlled burning methodology—the first legal instrument of this kind at a global level—under its Emission Reduction Fund. However, this approved methodology is currently only applicable to nine vegetation fuel types across northern parts of Australia in areas which receive on average over 600 mm rainfall annually, covering only 15.4% of the total land area in Australia. Savanna ecosystems extend across a large proportion of mainland Australia. This paper provides a critical review of ten key factors that need to be considered in developing a savanna burning methodology applicable to the other parts of Australia. It will also inform discussion in other countries intent on developing similar emissions reduction strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51122932016-11-29 Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors Maraseni, Tek Narayan Reardon-Smith, Kathryn Griffiths, Greg Apan, Armando Carbon Balance Manag Review Savanna fire is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Australia, savanna fire contributes about 3% of annual GHG emissions reportable to the Kyoto Protocol. In order to reduce GHG emissions from savanna burning, the Australian government has developed and approved a Kyoto compliant savanna controlled burning methodology—the first legal instrument of this kind at a global level—under its Emission Reduction Fund. However, this approved methodology is currently only applicable to nine vegetation fuel types across northern parts of Australia in areas which receive on average over 600 mm rainfall annually, covering only 15.4% of the total land area in Australia. Savanna ecosystems extend across a large proportion of mainland Australia. This paper provides a critical review of ten key factors that need to be considered in developing a savanna burning methodology applicable to the other parts of Australia. It will also inform discussion in other countries intent on developing similar emissions reduction strategies. Springer International Publishing 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112293/ /pubmed/27909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0067-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Maraseni, Tek Narayan
Reardon-Smith, Kathryn
Griffiths, Greg
Apan, Armando
Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
title Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
title_full Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
title_fullStr Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
title_full_unstemmed Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
title_short Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
title_sort savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27909461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0067-4
work_keys_str_mv AT maraseniteknarayan savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors
AT reardonsmithkathryn savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors
AT griffithsgreg savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors
AT apanarmando savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors