Cargando…
Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors
Savanna fire is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Australia, savanna fire contributes about 3% of annual GHG emissions reportable to the Kyoto Protocol. In order to reduce GHG emissions from savanna burning, the Australian government has developed and approved a Kyoto compl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0067-4 |
_version_ | 1782467967135514624 |
---|---|
author | Maraseni, Tek Narayan Reardon-Smith, Kathryn Griffiths, Greg Apan, Armando |
author_facet | Maraseni, Tek Narayan Reardon-Smith, Kathryn Griffiths, Greg Apan, Armando |
author_sort | Maraseni, Tek Narayan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Savanna fire is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Australia, savanna fire contributes about 3% of annual GHG emissions reportable to the Kyoto Protocol. In order to reduce GHG emissions from savanna burning, the Australian government has developed and approved a Kyoto compliant savanna controlled burning methodology—the first legal instrument of this kind at a global level—under its Emission Reduction Fund. However, this approved methodology is currently only applicable to nine vegetation fuel types across northern parts of Australia in areas which receive on average over 600 mm rainfall annually, covering only 15.4% of the total land area in Australia. Savanna ecosystems extend across a large proportion of mainland Australia. This paper provides a critical review of ten key factors that need to be considered in developing a savanna burning methodology applicable to the other parts of Australia. It will also inform discussion in other countries intent on developing similar emissions reduction strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5112293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51122932016-11-29 Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors Maraseni, Tek Narayan Reardon-Smith, Kathryn Griffiths, Greg Apan, Armando Carbon Balance Manag Review Savanna fire is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Australia, savanna fire contributes about 3% of annual GHG emissions reportable to the Kyoto Protocol. In order to reduce GHG emissions from savanna burning, the Australian government has developed and approved a Kyoto compliant savanna controlled burning methodology—the first legal instrument of this kind at a global level—under its Emission Reduction Fund. However, this approved methodology is currently only applicable to nine vegetation fuel types across northern parts of Australia in areas which receive on average over 600 mm rainfall annually, covering only 15.4% of the total land area in Australia. Savanna ecosystems extend across a large proportion of mainland Australia. This paper provides a critical review of ten key factors that need to be considered in developing a savanna burning methodology applicable to the other parts of Australia. It will also inform discussion in other countries intent on developing similar emissions reduction strategies. Springer International Publishing 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112293/ /pubmed/27909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0067-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Maraseni, Tek Narayan Reardon-Smith, Kathryn Griffiths, Greg Apan, Armando Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
title | Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
title_full | Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
title_fullStr | Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
title_short | Savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
title_sort | savanna burning methodology for fire management and emissions reduction: a critical review of influencing factors |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0067-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maraseniteknarayan savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors AT reardonsmithkathryn savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors AT griffithsgreg savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors AT apanarmando savannaburningmethodologyforfiremanagementandemissionsreductionacriticalreviewofinfluencingfactors |