Cargando…

The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states

BACKGROUND: Globally, inequality between men and women manifests in a variety of ways. In particular, gender inequality increases the risk of perpetration of violence against women (VAW), especially intimate partner violence (IPV), by males. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 35 % of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gattegno, Mariana V., Wilkins, Jasmine D., Evans, Dabney P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0428-3
_version_ 1782468040654323712
author Gattegno, Mariana V.
Wilkins, Jasmine D.
Evans, Dabney P.
author_facet Gattegno, Mariana V.
Wilkins, Jasmine D.
Evans, Dabney P.
author_sort Gattegno, Mariana V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, inequality between men and women manifests in a variety of ways. In particular, gender inequality increases the risk of perpetration of violence against women (VAW), especially intimate partner violence (IPV), by males. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 35 % of women have experienced physical, psychological and/or sexual IPV at least once in their lives, making IPV unacceptably common. In 2006, the Maria da Penha Law on Domestic and Family Violence, became the first federal law to regulate VAW and punish perpetrators in Brazil. This study examines the relationship between Brazilian VAW legislation and male perpetration of VAW by comparing reported prevalence of IPV before and after the enactment of the Maria da Penha Law. METHODS: To assess changes in magnitude of IPV before and after the law, we used data from the 2013 Brazilian National Health Survey; we replicated the analyses conducted for the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women-whose data were collected before the passage of the Maria da Penha Law. We compare findings from the two studies. RESULTS: Our analyses show an increase in the reported prevalence of physical violence, and a decrease in the reported prevalence of sexual and psychological violence. The increase may result from an actual increase in physical violence, increased awareness and reporting of physical violence, or a combination of both factors. Additionally, our analysis revealed that in the urban setting of São Paulo, physical violence was more likely to be severe and occur in the home; meanwhile, in the rural state of Pernambuco, physical violence was more likely to be moderate in nature and occur in public. CONCLUSION: The Maria da Penha Law increased attention and resources for VAW response and prevention; however, its true impact remains unmeasured. Our data suggest a need for regular, systematic collection of comparable population-based data to accurately estimate the true prevalence of IPV in Brazil. Furthermore, such data may inform policy and program planning to address specific needs across diverse settings including rural and urban communities. If routinely collected over time, such data can be used to develop policies and programs that address all forms of IPV, as well as evidence-based programs that address the social and cultural norms that support other forms of VAW and gender inequality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51126342016-11-23 The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states Gattegno, Mariana V. Wilkins, Jasmine D. Evans, Dabney P. Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Globally, inequality between men and women manifests in a variety of ways. In particular, gender inequality increases the risk of perpetration of violence against women (VAW), especially intimate partner violence (IPV), by males. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 35 % of women have experienced physical, psychological and/or sexual IPV at least once in their lives, making IPV unacceptably common. In 2006, the Maria da Penha Law on Domestic and Family Violence, became the first federal law to regulate VAW and punish perpetrators in Brazil. This study examines the relationship between Brazilian VAW legislation and male perpetration of VAW by comparing reported prevalence of IPV before and after the enactment of the Maria da Penha Law. METHODS: To assess changes in magnitude of IPV before and after the law, we used data from the 2013 Brazilian National Health Survey; we replicated the analyses conducted for the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women-whose data were collected before the passage of the Maria da Penha Law. We compare findings from the two studies. RESULTS: Our analyses show an increase in the reported prevalence of physical violence, and a decrease in the reported prevalence of sexual and psychological violence. The increase may result from an actual increase in physical violence, increased awareness and reporting of physical violence, or a combination of both factors. Additionally, our analysis revealed that in the urban setting of São Paulo, physical violence was more likely to be severe and occur in the home; meanwhile, in the rural state of Pernambuco, physical violence was more likely to be moderate in nature and occur in public. CONCLUSION: The Maria da Penha Law increased attention and resources for VAW response and prevention; however, its true impact remains unmeasured. Our data suggest a need for regular, systematic collection of comparable population-based data to accurately estimate the true prevalence of IPV in Brazil. Furthermore, such data may inform policy and program planning to address specific needs across diverse settings including rural and urban communities. If routinely collected over time, such data can be used to develop policies and programs that address all forms of IPV, as well as evidence-based programs that address the social and cultural norms that support other forms of VAW and gender inequality. BioMed Central 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5112634/ /pubmed/27852317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0428-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gattegno, Mariana V.
Wilkins, Jasmine D.
Evans, Dabney P.
The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states
title The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states
title_full The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states
title_fullStr The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states
title_short The relationship between the Maria da Penha Law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states
title_sort relationship between the maria da penha law and intimate partner violence in two brazilian states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0428-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gattegnomarianav therelationshipbetweenthemariadapenhalawandintimatepartnerviolenceintwobrazilianstates
AT wilkinsjasmined therelationshipbetweenthemariadapenhalawandintimatepartnerviolenceintwobrazilianstates
AT evansdabneyp therelationshipbetweenthemariadapenhalawandintimatepartnerviolenceintwobrazilianstates
AT gattegnomarianav relationshipbetweenthemariadapenhalawandintimatepartnerviolenceintwobrazilianstates
AT wilkinsjasmined relationshipbetweenthemariadapenhalawandintimatepartnerviolenceintwobrazilianstates
AT evansdabneyp relationshipbetweenthemariadapenhalawandintimatepartnerviolenceintwobrazilianstates