Cargando…

A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)

BACKGROUND: There is a need to change the focus of nursing education from traditional teacher-centered training programs to student-centered active methods. The integration of the two active learning techniques will improve the effectiveness of training programs. The objective of this study is to co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarifsanaiey, Nahid, Amini, Mitra, Saadat, Farideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0812-0
_version_ 1782468047820292096
author Zarifsanaiey, Nahid
Amini, Mitra
Saadat, Farideh
author_facet Zarifsanaiey, Nahid
Amini, Mitra
Saadat, Farideh
author_sort Zarifsanaiey, Nahid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need to change the focus of nursing education from traditional teacher-centered training programs to student-centered active methods. The integration of the two active learning techniques will improve the effectiveness of training programs. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of the integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies) and simulation-based training on the performance level and critical thinking ability of nursing students. METHODS: The present quasi-experimental study was performed in 2014 on 40 students who were studying practical nursing principles and skills course in the first half of the academic year in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Students were randomly divided into control (n = 20) and experimental (n = 20) groups. After training students through simulation and integrated education (simulation and critical thinking strategies), the students' critical thinking ability and performance were evaluated via the use of California Critical Thinking Ability Questionnaire B (CCTST) and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) comprising 10 stations, respectively. The external reliability of the California Critical Thinking questionnaire was reported by Case B.to be between 0.78 and 0.80 and the validity of OSCE was approved by 5 members of the faculty. Furthermore, by using Split Half method (the correlation between odd and even stations), the reliability of the test was approved with correlation coefficient of 0.66. Data were analyzed using t-test and Mann–Whitney test. A significance level of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean scores of the experimental group performance level were higher than the mean score of the control group performance level. This difference was statistically significant and students in the experimental group in OSCE stations had significantly higher performance than the control group (P <0.001). However, the mean scores obtained for the critical thinking did not increase before and after the intervention. CONCLUSION: The results showed that, the students’ performance level was increased by the application of integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51126662016-11-23 A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies) Zarifsanaiey, Nahid Amini, Mitra Saadat, Farideh BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need to change the focus of nursing education from traditional teacher-centered training programs to student-centered active methods. The integration of the two active learning techniques will improve the effectiveness of training programs. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of the integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies) and simulation-based training on the performance level and critical thinking ability of nursing students. METHODS: The present quasi-experimental study was performed in 2014 on 40 students who were studying practical nursing principles and skills course in the first half of the academic year in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Students were randomly divided into control (n = 20) and experimental (n = 20) groups. After training students through simulation and integrated education (simulation and critical thinking strategies), the students' critical thinking ability and performance were evaluated via the use of California Critical Thinking Ability Questionnaire B (CCTST) and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) comprising 10 stations, respectively. The external reliability of the California Critical Thinking questionnaire was reported by Case B.to be between 0.78 and 0.80 and the validity of OSCE was approved by 5 members of the faculty. Furthermore, by using Split Half method (the correlation between odd and even stations), the reliability of the test was approved with correlation coefficient of 0.66. Data were analyzed using t-test and Mann–Whitney test. A significance level of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean scores of the experimental group performance level were higher than the mean score of the control group performance level. This difference was statistically significant and students in the experimental group in OSCE stations had significantly higher performance than the control group (P <0.001). However, the mean scores obtained for the critical thinking did not increase before and after the intervention. CONCLUSION: The results showed that, the students’ performance level was increased by the application of integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies). BioMed Central 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112666/ /pubmed/27852292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0812-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zarifsanaiey, Nahid
Amini, Mitra
Saadat, Farideh
A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
title A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
title_full A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
title_fullStr A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
title_short A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
title_sort comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student’s performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0812-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zarifsanaieynahid acomparisonofeducationalstrategiesfortheacquisitionofnursingstudentsperformanceandcriticalthinkingsimulationbasedtrainingvsintegratedtrainingsimulationandcriticalthinkingstrategies
AT aminimitra acomparisonofeducationalstrategiesfortheacquisitionofnursingstudentsperformanceandcriticalthinkingsimulationbasedtrainingvsintegratedtrainingsimulationandcriticalthinkingstrategies
AT saadatfarideh acomparisonofeducationalstrategiesfortheacquisitionofnursingstudentsperformanceandcriticalthinkingsimulationbasedtrainingvsintegratedtrainingsimulationandcriticalthinkingstrategies
AT zarifsanaieynahid comparisonofeducationalstrategiesfortheacquisitionofnursingstudentsperformanceandcriticalthinkingsimulationbasedtrainingvsintegratedtrainingsimulationandcriticalthinkingstrategies
AT aminimitra comparisonofeducationalstrategiesfortheacquisitionofnursingstudentsperformanceandcriticalthinkingsimulationbasedtrainingvsintegratedtrainingsimulationandcriticalthinkingstrategies
AT saadatfarideh comparisonofeducationalstrategiesfortheacquisitionofnursingstudentsperformanceandcriticalthinkingsimulationbasedtrainingvsintegratedtrainingsimulationandcriticalthinkingstrategies