Cargando…

Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument

BACKGROUND: Variation in development methods of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments has led to inconsistent inclusion of risk factors and concerns about content validity. A new evidenced-based Risk Assessment Instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary Or Secondary Evaluation Tool - PURPOSE-T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleman, S., Nixon, J., Keen, J., Muir, D., Wilson, L., McGinnis, E., Stubbs, N., Dealey, C., Nelson, E. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0257-5
_version_ 1782468049264181248
author Coleman, S.
Nixon, J.
Keen, J.
Muir, D.
Wilson, L.
McGinnis, E.
Stubbs, N.
Dealey, C.
Nelson, E. A.
author_facet Coleman, S.
Nixon, J.
Keen, J.
Muir, D.
Wilson, L.
McGinnis, E.
Stubbs, N.
Dealey, C.
Nelson, E. A.
author_sort Coleman, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Variation in development methods of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments has led to inconsistent inclusion of risk factors and concerns about content validity. A new evidenced-based Risk Assessment Instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary Or Secondary Evaluation Tool - PURPOSE-T was developed as part of a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded Pressure Ulcer Research Programme (PURPOSE: RP-PG-0407-10056). This paper reports the pre-test phase to assess and improve PURPOSE-T acceptability, usability and confirm content validity. METHODS: A descriptive study incorporating cognitive pre-testing methods and integration of service user views was undertaken over 3 cycles comprising PURPOSE-T training, a focus group and one-to-one think-aloud interviews. Clinical nurses from 2 acute and 2 community NHS Trusts, were grouped according to job role. Focus group participants used 3 vignettes to complete PURPOSE-T assessments and then participated in the focus group. Think-aloud participants were interviewed during their completion of PURPOSE-T. After each pre-test cycle analysis was undertaken and adjustment/improvements made to PURPOSE-T in an iterative process. This incorporated the use of descriptive statistics for data completeness and decision rule compliance and directed content analysis for interview and focus group data. Data were collected April 2012-June 2012. RESULTS: Thirty-four nurses participated in 3 pre-test cycles. Data from 3 focus groups, 12 think-aloud interviews incorporating 101 PURPOSE-T assessments led to changes to improve instrument content and design, flow and format, decision support and item-specific wording. Acceptability and usability were demonstrated by improved data completion and appropriate risk pathway allocation. The pre-test also confirmed content validity with clinical nurses. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-test was an important step in the development of the preliminary PURPOSE-T and the methods used may have wider instrument development application. PURPOSE-T proposes a new approach to pressure ulcer risk assessment, incorporating a screening stage, the inclusion of skin status to distinguish between those who require primary prevention and those who require secondary prevention/treatment and the use of colour to support pathway allocation and decision making. Further clinical evaluation is planned to assess the reliability and validity of PURPOSE-T and it’s impact on care processes and patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51126722016-11-25 Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument Coleman, S. Nixon, J. Keen, J. Muir, D. Wilson, L. McGinnis, E. Stubbs, N. Dealey, C. Nelson, E. A. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Variation in development methods of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments has led to inconsistent inclusion of risk factors and concerns about content validity. A new evidenced-based Risk Assessment Instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary Or Secondary Evaluation Tool - PURPOSE-T was developed as part of a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded Pressure Ulcer Research Programme (PURPOSE: RP-PG-0407-10056). This paper reports the pre-test phase to assess and improve PURPOSE-T acceptability, usability and confirm content validity. METHODS: A descriptive study incorporating cognitive pre-testing methods and integration of service user views was undertaken over 3 cycles comprising PURPOSE-T training, a focus group and one-to-one think-aloud interviews. Clinical nurses from 2 acute and 2 community NHS Trusts, were grouped according to job role. Focus group participants used 3 vignettes to complete PURPOSE-T assessments and then participated in the focus group. Think-aloud participants were interviewed during their completion of PURPOSE-T. After each pre-test cycle analysis was undertaken and adjustment/improvements made to PURPOSE-T in an iterative process. This incorporated the use of descriptive statistics for data completeness and decision rule compliance and directed content analysis for interview and focus group data. Data were collected April 2012-June 2012. RESULTS: Thirty-four nurses participated in 3 pre-test cycles. Data from 3 focus groups, 12 think-aloud interviews incorporating 101 PURPOSE-T assessments led to changes to improve instrument content and design, flow and format, decision support and item-specific wording. Acceptability and usability were demonstrated by improved data completion and appropriate risk pathway allocation. The pre-test also confirmed content validity with clinical nurses. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-test was an important step in the development of the preliminary PURPOSE-T and the methods used may have wider instrument development application. PURPOSE-T proposes a new approach to pressure ulcer risk assessment, incorporating a screening stage, the inclusion of skin status to distinguish between those who require primary prevention and those who require secondary prevention/treatment and the use of colour to support pathway allocation and decision making. Further clinical evaluation is planned to assess the reliability and validity of PURPOSE-T and it’s impact on care processes and patient outcomes. BioMed Central 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112672/ /pubmed/27852237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0257-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coleman, S.
Nixon, J.
Keen, J.
Muir, D.
Wilson, L.
McGinnis, E.
Stubbs, N.
Dealey, C.
Nelson, E. A.
Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
title Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
title_full Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
title_fullStr Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
title_full_unstemmed Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
title_short Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
title_sort using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0257-5
work_keys_str_mv AT colemans usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT nixonj usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT keenj usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT muird usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT wilsonl usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT mcginnise usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT stubbsn usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT dealeyc usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument
AT nelsonea usingcognitivepretestingmethodsinthedevelopmentofanewevidencedbasedpressureulcerriskassessmentinstrument