Cargando…

Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole

BACKGROUD: The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) has been used widely for refractive errors, We performed this prospective randomized comparative study to compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and vaults of the eyes implanted with conventional ICL and central hole ICL. METHODS: This study e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Haiting, Niu, Guangzeng, Fan, Yuxiang, Ma, Jingxue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1
_version_ 1782468054348726272
author Chen, Haiting
Niu, Guangzeng
Fan, Yuxiang
Ma, Jingxue
author_facet Chen, Haiting
Niu, Guangzeng
Fan, Yuxiang
Ma, Jingxue
author_sort Chen, Haiting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) has been used widely for refractive errors, We performed this prospective randomized comparative study to compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and vaults of the eyes implanted with conventional ICL and central hole ICL. METHODS: This study evaluated 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent central hole ICL implantation in one eye and conventional ICL implantation in the other eye by randomization assignment. noncontact intraocular pressure were performed on 6 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, while ICL vaults were measured on 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months. RESULTS: The IOP of both eyeswithcentral hole and conventional ICLrosetemporarily during the first month after surgeries, especially on 1 day and 2 weeks points postoperatively. The IOP ofeyes with central hole ICL was higher than that of conventionl ICL. The vaults ofeyes with central hole and conventional ICL decreased slightly with time but did not significantly affect the postoperative IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the sensitivity of viscoelastic agents or inflammation, this newly developed central hole ICL implantation appears to be equivalent in safty and effcacy to conventional ICL implantation for the correction of ametropia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-INR-16008896. Retrospectively registered 24 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51126962016-11-25 Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole Chen, Haiting Niu, Guangzeng Fan, Yuxiang Ma, Jingxue BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUD: The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) has been used widely for refractive errors, We performed this prospective randomized comparative study to compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and vaults of the eyes implanted with conventional ICL and central hole ICL. METHODS: This study evaluated 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent central hole ICL implantation in one eye and conventional ICL implantation in the other eye by randomization assignment. noncontact intraocular pressure were performed on 6 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, while ICL vaults were measured on 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months. RESULTS: The IOP of both eyeswithcentral hole and conventional ICLrosetemporarily during the first month after surgeries, especially on 1 day and 2 weeks points postoperatively. The IOP ofeyes with central hole ICL was higher than that of conventionl ICL. The vaults ofeyes with central hole and conventional ICL decreased slightly with time but did not significantly affect the postoperative IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the sensitivity of viscoelastic agents or inflammation, this newly developed central hole ICL implantation appears to be equivalent in safty and effcacy to conventional ICL implantation for the correction of ametropia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-INR-16008896. Retrospectively registered 24 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112696/ /pubmed/27852246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Haiting
Niu, Guangzeng
Fan, Yuxiang
Ma, Jingxue
Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
title Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
title_full Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
title_fullStr Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
title_short Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
title_sort comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhaiting comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole
AT niuguangzeng comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole
AT fanyuxiang comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole
AT majingxue comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole