Cargando…
Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole
BACKGROUD: The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) has been used widely for refractive errors, We performed this prospective randomized comparative study to compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and vaults of the eyes implanted with conventional ICL and central hole ICL. METHODS: This study e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1 |
_version_ | 1782468054348726272 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Haiting Niu, Guangzeng Fan, Yuxiang Ma, Jingxue |
author_facet | Chen, Haiting Niu, Guangzeng Fan, Yuxiang Ma, Jingxue |
author_sort | Chen, Haiting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUD: The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) has been used widely for refractive errors, We performed this prospective randomized comparative study to compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and vaults of the eyes implanted with conventional ICL and central hole ICL. METHODS: This study evaluated 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent central hole ICL implantation in one eye and conventional ICL implantation in the other eye by randomization assignment. noncontact intraocular pressure were performed on 6 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, while ICL vaults were measured on 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months. RESULTS: The IOP of both eyeswithcentral hole and conventional ICLrosetemporarily during the first month after surgeries, especially on 1 day and 2 weeks points postoperatively. The IOP ofeyes with central hole ICL was higher than that of conventionl ICL. The vaults ofeyes with central hole and conventional ICL decreased slightly with time but did not significantly affect the postoperative IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the sensitivity of viscoelastic agents or inflammation, this newly developed central hole ICL implantation appears to be equivalent in safty and effcacy to conventional ICL implantation for the correction of ametropia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-INR-16008896. Retrospectively registered 24 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5112696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51126962016-11-25 Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole Chen, Haiting Niu, Guangzeng Fan, Yuxiang Ma, Jingxue BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUD: The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) has been used widely for refractive errors, We performed this prospective randomized comparative study to compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and vaults of the eyes implanted with conventional ICL and central hole ICL. METHODS: This study evaluated 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent central hole ICL implantation in one eye and conventional ICL implantation in the other eye by randomization assignment. noncontact intraocular pressure were performed on 6 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, while ICL vaults were measured on 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months. RESULTS: The IOP of both eyeswithcentral hole and conventional ICLrosetemporarily during the first month after surgeries, especially on 1 day and 2 weeks points postoperatively. The IOP ofeyes with central hole ICL was higher than that of conventionl ICL. The vaults ofeyes with central hole and conventional ICL decreased slightly with time but did not significantly affect the postoperative IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the sensitivity of viscoelastic agents or inflammation, this newly developed central hole ICL implantation appears to be equivalent in safty and effcacy to conventional ICL implantation for the correction of ametropia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-INR-16008896. Retrospectively registered 24 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112696/ /pubmed/27852246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Haiting Niu, Guangzeng Fan, Yuxiang Ma, Jingxue Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
title | Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
title_full | Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
title_fullStr | Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
title_short | Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
title_sort | comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0375-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhaiting comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole AT niuguangzeng comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole AT fanyuxiang comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole AT majingxue comparisonofintraocularpressureandvaultafterimplantationofimplantablecollamerlenswithandwithoutacentralhole |