Cargando…

Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears

The propensity for a grizzly bear to develop conflict behaviours might be a result of social learning between mothers and cubs, genetic inheritance, or both learning and inheritance. Using non-invasive genetic sampling, we collected grizzly bear hair samples during 2011–2014 across southwestern Albe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morehouse, Andrea T., Graves, Tabitha A., Mikle, Nate, Boyce, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27851753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165425
_version_ 1782468091949613056
author Morehouse, Andrea T.
Graves, Tabitha A.
Mikle, Nate
Boyce, Mark S.
author_facet Morehouse, Andrea T.
Graves, Tabitha A.
Mikle, Nate
Boyce, Mark S.
author_sort Morehouse, Andrea T.
collection PubMed
description The propensity for a grizzly bear to develop conflict behaviours might be a result of social learning between mothers and cubs, genetic inheritance, or both learning and inheritance. Using non-invasive genetic sampling, we collected grizzly bear hair samples during 2011–2014 across southwestern Alberta, Canada. We targeted private agricultural lands for hair samples at grizzly bear incident sites, defining an incident as an occurrence in which the grizzly bear caused property damage, obtained anthropogenic food, or killed or attempted to kill livestock or pets. We genotyped 213 unique grizzly bears (118 M, 95 F) at 24 microsatellite loci, plus the amelogenin marker for sex. We used the program COLONY to assign parentage. We evaluated 76 mother-offspring relationships and 119 father-offspring relationships. We compared the frequency of problem and non-problem offspring from problem and non-problem parents, excluding dependent offspring from our analysis. Our results support the social learning hypothesis, but not the genetic inheritance hypothesis. Offspring of problem mothers are more likely to be involved in conflict behaviours, while offspring from non-problem mothers are not likely to be involved in incidents or human-bear conflicts themselves (Barnard’s test, p = 0.05, 62.5% of offspring from problem mothers were problem bears). There was no evidence that offspring are more likely to be involved in conflict behaviour if their fathers had been problem bears (Barnard’s test, p = 0.92, 29.6% of offspring from problem fathers were problem bears). For the mother-offspring relationships evaluated, 30.3% of offspring were identified as problem bears independent of their mother’s conflict status. Similarly, 28.6% of offspring were identified as problem bears independent of their father’s conflict status. Proactive mitigation to prevent female bears from becoming problem individuals likely will help prevent the perpetuation of conflicts through social learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51128682016-12-08 Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears Morehouse, Andrea T. Graves, Tabitha A. Mikle, Nate Boyce, Mark S. PLoS One Research Article The propensity for a grizzly bear to develop conflict behaviours might be a result of social learning between mothers and cubs, genetic inheritance, or both learning and inheritance. Using non-invasive genetic sampling, we collected grizzly bear hair samples during 2011–2014 across southwestern Alberta, Canada. We targeted private agricultural lands for hair samples at grizzly bear incident sites, defining an incident as an occurrence in which the grizzly bear caused property damage, obtained anthropogenic food, or killed or attempted to kill livestock or pets. We genotyped 213 unique grizzly bears (118 M, 95 F) at 24 microsatellite loci, plus the amelogenin marker for sex. We used the program COLONY to assign parentage. We evaluated 76 mother-offspring relationships and 119 father-offspring relationships. We compared the frequency of problem and non-problem offspring from problem and non-problem parents, excluding dependent offspring from our analysis. Our results support the social learning hypothesis, but not the genetic inheritance hypothesis. Offspring of problem mothers are more likely to be involved in conflict behaviours, while offspring from non-problem mothers are not likely to be involved in incidents or human-bear conflicts themselves (Barnard’s test, p = 0.05, 62.5% of offspring from problem mothers were problem bears). There was no evidence that offspring are more likely to be involved in conflict behaviour if their fathers had been problem bears (Barnard’s test, p = 0.92, 29.6% of offspring from problem fathers were problem bears). For the mother-offspring relationships evaluated, 30.3% of offspring were identified as problem bears independent of their mother’s conflict status. Similarly, 28.6% of offspring were identified as problem bears independent of their father’s conflict status. Proactive mitigation to prevent female bears from becoming problem individuals likely will help prevent the perpetuation of conflicts through social learning. Public Library of Science 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5112868/ /pubmed/27851753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165425 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morehouse, Andrea T.
Graves, Tabitha A.
Mikle, Nate
Boyce, Mark S.
Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears
title Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears
title_full Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears
title_fullStr Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears
title_full_unstemmed Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears
title_short Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears
title_sort nature vs. nurture: evidence for social learning of conflict behaviour in grizzly bears
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27851753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165425
work_keys_str_mv AT morehouseandreat naturevsnurtureevidenceforsociallearningofconflictbehaviouringrizzlybears
AT gravestabithaa naturevsnurtureevidenceforsociallearningofconflictbehaviouringrizzlybears
AT miklenate naturevsnurtureevidenceforsociallearningofconflictbehaviouringrizzlybears
AT boycemarks naturevsnurtureevidenceforsociallearningofconflictbehaviouringrizzlybears