Cargando…
Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free ka...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166556 |
_version_ | 1782468110484242432 |
---|---|
author | Zeman, David Kušnierová, Pavlína Švagera, Zdeněk Všianský, František Byrtusová, Monika Hradílek, Pavel Kurková, Barbora Zapletalová, Olga Bartoš, Vladimír |
author_facet | Zeman, David Kušnierová, Pavlína Švagera, Zdeněk Všianský, František Byrtusová, Monika Hradílek, Pavel Kurková, Barbora Zapletalová, Olga Bartoš, Vladimír |
author_sort | Zeman, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free kappa and free lambda light chain concentrations in CSF and serum in various disease groups. METHODS: We analysed 166 paired CSF and serum samples by at least one of the following methods: turbidimetry (Freelite™, SPA(PLUS)), nephelometry (N Latex FLC™, BN ProSpec), and two different (commercially available and in-house developed) sandwich ELISAs. The results were compared with oligoclonal fLC detected by affinity-mediated immunoblotting after isoelectric focusing. RESULTS: Although the correlations between quantitative methods were good, both proportional and systematic differences were discerned. However, no major differences were observed in the prediction of positive oligoclonal fLC test. Surprisingly, CSF free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were lower than those in serum in about 75% of samples with negative oligoclonal fLC test. In about a half of patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, profoundly increased free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were found in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using appropriate method-specific cut-offs, different methods of CSF fLC quantitation can be used for the prediction of intrathecal fLC synthesis. The reason for unexpectedly low free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios in normal CSFs remains to be elucidated. Whereas CSF free kappa light chain concentration is increased in most patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, CSF free lambda light chain values show large interindividual variability in these patients and should be investigated further for possible immunopathological and prognostic significance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5112955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51129552016-12-08 Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting Zeman, David Kušnierová, Pavlína Švagera, Zdeněk Všianský, František Byrtusová, Monika Hradílek, Pavel Kurková, Barbora Zapletalová, Olga Bartoš, Vladimír PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free kappa and free lambda light chain concentrations in CSF and serum in various disease groups. METHODS: We analysed 166 paired CSF and serum samples by at least one of the following methods: turbidimetry (Freelite™, SPA(PLUS)), nephelometry (N Latex FLC™, BN ProSpec), and two different (commercially available and in-house developed) sandwich ELISAs. The results were compared with oligoclonal fLC detected by affinity-mediated immunoblotting after isoelectric focusing. RESULTS: Although the correlations between quantitative methods were good, both proportional and systematic differences were discerned. However, no major differences were observed in the prediction of positive oligoclonal fLC test. Surprisingly, CSF free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were lower than those in serum in about 75% of samples with negative oligoclonal fLC test. In about a half of patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, profoundly increased free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were found in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using appropriate method-specific cut-offs, different methods of CSF fLC quantitation can be used for the prediction of intrathecal fLC synthesis. The reason for unexpectedly low free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios in normal CSFs remains to be elucidated. Whereas CSF free kappa light chain concentration is increased in most patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, CSF free lambda light chain values show large interindividual variability in these patients and should be investigated further for possible immunopathological and prognostic significance. Public Library of Science 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5112955/ /pubmed/27846293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166556 Text en © 2016 Zeman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zeman, David Kušnierová, Pavlína Švagera, Zdeněk Všianský, František Byrtusová, Monika Hradílek, Pavel Kurková, Barbora Zapletalová, Olga Bartoš, Vladimír Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting |
title | Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting |
title_full | Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting |
title_short | Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting |
title_sort | assessment of intrathecal free light chain synthesis: comparison of different quantitative methods with the detection of oligoclonal free light chains by isoelectric focusing and affinity-mediated immunoblotting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zemandavid assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT kusnierovapavlina assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT svagerazdenek assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT vsianskyfrantisek assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT byrtusovamonika assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT hradilekpavel assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT kurkovabarbora assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT zapletalovaolga assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting AT bartosvladimir assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting |