Cargando…

Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free ka...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeman, David, Kušnierová, Pavlína, Švagera, Zdeněk, Všianský, František, Byrtusová, Monika, Hradílek, Pavel, Kurková, Barbora, Zapletalová, Olga, Bartoš, Vladimír
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166556
_version_ 1782468110484242432
author Zeman, David
Kušnierová, Pavlína
Švagera, Zdeněk
Všianský, František
Byrtusová, Monika
Hradílek, Pavel
Kurková, Barbora
Zapletalová, Olga
Bartoš, Vladimír
author_facet Zeman, David
Kušnierová, Pavlína
Švagera, Zdeněk
Všianský, František
Byrtusová, Monika
Hradílek, Pavel
Kurková, Barbora
Zapletalová, Olga
Bartoš, Vladimír
author_sort Zeman, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free kappa and free lambda light chain concentrations in CSF and serum in various disease groups. METHODS: We analysed 166 paired CSF and serum samples by at least one of the following methods: turbidimetry (Freelite™, SPA(PLUS)), nephelometry (N Latex FLC™, BN ProSpec), and two different (commercially available and in-house developed) sandwich ELISAs. The results were compared with oligoclonal fLC detected by affinity-mediated immunoblotting after isoelectric focusing. RESULTS: Although the correlations between quantitative methods were good, both proportional and systematic differences were discerned. However, no major differences were observed in the prediction of positive oligoclonal fLC test. Surprisingly, CSF free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were lower than those in serum in about 75% of samples with negative oligoclonal fLC test. In about a half of patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, profoundly increased free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were found in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using appropriate method-specific cut-offs, different methods of CSF fLC quantitation can be used for the prediction of intrathecal fLC synthesis. The reason for unexpectedly low free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios in normal CSFs remains to be elucidated. Whereas CSF free kappa light chain concentration is increased in most patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, CSF free lambda light chain values show large interindividual variability in these patients and should be investigated further for possible immunopathological and prognostic significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5112955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51129552016-12-08 Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting Zeman, David Kušnierová, Pavlína Švagera, Zdeněk Všianský, František Byrtusová, Monika Hradílek, Pavel Kurková, Barbora Zapletalová, Olga Bartoš, Vladimír PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free kappa and free lambda light chain concentrations in CSF and serum in various disease groups. METHODS: We analysed 166 paired CSF and serum samples by at least one of the following methods: turbidimetry (Freelite™, SPA(PLUS)), nephelometry (N Latex FLC™, BN ProSpec), and two different (commercially available and in-house developed) sandwich ELISAs. The results were compared with oligoclonal fLC detected by affinity-mediated immunoblotting after isoelectric focusing. RESULTS: Although the correlations between quantitative methods were good, both proportional and systematic differences were discerned. However, no major differences were observed in the prediction of positive oligoclonal fLC test. Surprisingly, CSF free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were lower than those in serum in about 75% of samples with negative oligoclonal fLC test. In about a half of patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, profoundly increased free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were found in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using appropriate method-specific cut-offs, different methods of CSF fLC quantitation can be used for the prediction of intrathecal fLC synthesis. The reason for unexpectedly low free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios in normal CSFs remains to be elucidated. Whereas CSF free kappa light chain concentration is increased in most patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, CSF free lambda light chain values show large interindividual variability in these patients and should be investigated further for possible immunopathological and prognostic significance. Public Library of Science 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5112955/ /pubmed/27846293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166556 Text en © 2016 Zeman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zeman, David
Kušnierová, Pavlína
Švagera, Zdeněk
Všianský, František
Byrtusová, Monika
Hradílek, Pavel
Kurková, Barbora
Zapletalová, Olga
Bartoš, Vladimír
Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
title Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
title_full Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
title_fullStr Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
title_short Assessment of Intrathecal Free Light Chain Synthesis: Comparison of Different Quantitative Methods with the Detection of Oligoclonal Free Light Chains by Isoelectric Focusing and Affinity-Mediated Immunoblotting
title_sort assessment of intrathecal free light chain synthesis: comparison of different quantitative methods with the detection of oligoclonal free light chains by isoelectric focusing and affinity-mediated immunoblotting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166556
work_keys_str_mv AT zemandavid assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT kusnierovapavlina assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT svagerazdenek assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT vsianskyfrantisek assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT byrtusovamonika assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT hradilekpavel assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT kurkovabarbora assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT zapletalovaolga assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting
AT bartosvladimir assessmentofintrathecalfreelightchainsynthesiscomparisonofdifferentquantitativemethodswiththedetectionofoligoclonalfreelightchainsbyisoelectricfocusingandaffinitymediatedimmunoblotting