Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk

BACKGROUND: Aspirin has been shown to lower the incidence and the mortality of vascular disease and cancer but its wider adoption appears to be seriously impeded by concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Unlike heart attacks, stroke and cancer, GI bleeding is an acute event, usually followed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elwood, Peter C., Morgan, Gareth, Galante, Julieta, Chia, John W. K., Dolwani, Sunil, Graziano, J. Michael, Kelson, Mark, Lanas, Angel, Longley, Marcus, Phillips, Ceri J., Pickering, Janet, Roberts, Stephen E., Soon, Swee S., Steward, Will, Morris, Delyth, Weightman, Alison L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166166
_version_ 1782468124724953088
author Elwood, Peter C.
Morgan, Gareth
Galante, Julieta
Chia, John W. K.
Dolwani, Sunil
Graziano, J. Michael
Kelson, Mark
Lanas, Angel
Longley, Marcus
Phillips, Ceri J.
Pickering, Janet
Roberts, Stephen E.
Soon, Swee S.
Steward, Will
Morris, Delyth
Weightman, Alison L.
author_facet Elwood, Peter C.
Morgan, Gareth
Galante, Julieta
Chia, John W. K.
Dolwani, Sunil
Graziano, J. Michael
Kelson, Mark
Lanas, Angel
Longley, Marcus
Phillips, Ceri J.
Pickering, Janet
Roberts, Stephen E.
Soon, Swee S.
Steward, Will
Morris, Delyth
Weightman, Alison L.
author_sort Elwood, Peter C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aspirin has been shown to lower the incidence and the mortality of vascular disease and cancer but its wider adoption appears to be seriously impeded by concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Unlike heart attacks, stroke and cancer, GI bleeding is an acute event, usually followed by complete recovery. We propose therefore that a more appropriate evaluation of the risk-benefit balance would be based on fatal adverse events, rather than on the incidence of bleeding. We therefore present a literature search and meta-analysis to ascertain fatal events attributable to low-dose aspirin. METHODS: In a systematic literature review we identified reports of randomised controlled trials of aspirin in which both total GI bleeding events and bleeds that led to death had been reported. Principal investigators of studies in which fatal events had not been adequately described were contacted via email and asked for further details. A meta-analyses was then performed to estimate the risk of fatal gastrointestinal bleeding attributable to low-dose aspirin. RESULTS: Eleven randomised trials were identified in the literature search. In these the relative risk (RR) of ‘major’ incident GI bleeding in subjects who had been randomised to low-dose aspirin was 1.55 (95% CI 1.33, 1.83), and the risk of a bleed attributable to aspirin being fatal was 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.80). In all the subjects randomised to aspirin, compared with those randomised not to receive aspirin, there was no significant increase in the risk of a fatal bleed (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41, 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the adverse events caused by aspirin are GI bleeds, and there appears to be no valid evidence that the overall frequency of fatal GI bleeds is increased by aspirin. The substantive risk for prophylactic aspirin is therefore cerebral haemorrhage which can be fatal or severely disabling, with an estimated risk of one death and one disabling stroke for every 1,000 people taking aspirin for ten years. These adverse effects of aspirin should be weighed against the reductions in vascular disease and cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5113022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51130222016-12-08 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk Elwood, Peter C. Morgan, Gareth Galante, Julieta Chia, John W. K. Dolwani, Sunil Graziano, J. Michael Kelson, Mark Lanas, Angel Longley, Marcus Phillips, Ceri J. Pickering, Janet Roberts, Stephen E. Soon, Swee S. Steward, Will Morris, Delyth Weightman, Alison L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Aspirin has been shown to lower the incidence and the mortality of vascular disease and cancer but its wider adoption appears to be seriously impeded by concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Unlike heart attacks, stroke and cancer, GI bleeding is an acute event, usually followed by complete recovery. We propose therefore that a more appropriate evaluation of the risk-benefit balance would be based on fatal adverse events, rather than on the incidence of bleeding. We therefore present a literature search and meta-analysis to ascertain fatal events attributable to low-dose aspirin. METHODS: In a systematic literature review we identified reports of randomised controlled trials of aspirin in which both total GI bleeding events and bleeds that led to death had been reported. Principal investigators of studies in which fatal events had not been adequately described were contacted via email and asked for further details. A meta-analyses was then performed to estimate the risk of fatal gastrointestinal bleeding attributable to low-dose aspirin. RESULTS: Eleven randomised trials were identified in the literature search. In these the relative risk (RR) of ‘major’ incident GI bleeding in subjects who had been randomised to low-dose aspirin was 1.55 (95% CI 1.33, 1.83), and the risk of a bleed attributable to aspirin being fatal was 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.80). In all the subjects randomised to aspirin, compared with those randomised not to receive aspirin, there was no significant increase in the risk of a fatal bleed (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41, 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the adverse events caused by aspirin are GI bleeds, and there appears to be no valid evidence that the overall frequency of fatal GI bleeds is increased by aspirin. The substantive risk for prophylactic aspirin is therefore cerebral haemorrhage which can be fatal or severely disabling, with an estimated risk of one death and one disabling stroke for every 1,000 people taking aspirin for ten years. These adverse effects of aspirin should be weighed against the reductions in vascular disease and cancer. Public Library of Science 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5113022/ /pubmed/27846246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166166 Text en © 2016 Elwood et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elwood, Peter C.
Morgan, Gareth
Galante, Julieta
Chia, John W. K.
Dolwani, Sunil
Graziano, J. Michael
Kelson, Mark
Lanas, Angel
Longley, Marcus
Phillips, Ceri J.
Pickering, Janet
Roberts, Stephen E.
Soon, Swee S.
Steward, Will
Morris, Delyth
Weightman, Alison L.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials to ascertain fatal gastrointestinal bleeding events attributable to preventive low-dose aspirin: no evidence of increased risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27846246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166166
work_keys_str_mv AT elwoodpeterc systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT morgangareth systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT galantejulieta systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT chiajohnwk systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT dolwanisunil systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT grazianojmichael systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT kelsonmark systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT lanasangel systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT longleymarcus systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT phillipscerij systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT pickeringjanet systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT robertsstephene systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT soonswees systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT stewardwill systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT morrisdelyth systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk
AT weightmanalisonl systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrialstoascertainfatalgastrointestinalbleedingeventsattributabletopreventivelowdoseaspirinnoevidenceofincreasedrisk