Cargando…

‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool

In the management of chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a shift from doctor-driven care to patient-centred integrated care with active involvement of and self-management by the patient. A recently developed tool, the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slok, Annerika H M, Twellaar, Mascha, Jutbo, Leslie, Kotz, Daniel, Chavannes, Niels H, Holverda, Sebastiaan, Salomé, Philippe L, Dekhuijzen, P N Richard, Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H, Schuiten, Denise, in ’t Veen, Johannes C C M, van Schayck, Onno C P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.74
_version_ 1782468142125023232
author Slok, Annerika H M
Twellaar, Mascha
Jutbo, Leslie
Kotz, Daniel
Chavannes, Niels H
Holverda, Sebastiaan
Salomé, Philippe L
Dekhuijzen, P N Richard
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H
Schuiten, Denise
in ’t Veen, Johannes C C M
van Schayck, Onno C P
author_facet Slok, Annerika H M
Twellaar, Mascha
Jutbo, Leslie
Kotz, Daniel
Chavannes, Niels H
Holverda, Sebastiaan
Salomé, Philippe L
Dekhuijzen, P N Richard
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H
Schuiten, Denise
in ’t Veen, Johannes C C M
van Schayck, Onno C P
author_sort Slok, Annerika H M
collection PubMed
description In the management of chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a shift from doctor-driven care to patient-centred integrated care with active involvement of and self-management by the patient. A recently developed tool, the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool, can be used in this transition to facilitate self-management support and shared decision-making. We performed a qualitative study, in which we collected and analysed the data using the methods of conventional content analyses. We performed in-depth interviews consisting of mainly open questions. Fifteen healthcare providers and 21 patients were interviewed who had worked with the ABC tool in daily care. In general, participants responded positively to the tool. Healthcare providers felt the visual representation provided was effective and comprehensible for patients and provided them with insight into their disease, a finding that patients confirmed. If patients were allowed to choose between a consultation with or without the ABC tool, the majority would prefer using the tool: it provides them with an overview and insight, which makes it easier to discuss all relevant topics related to COPD. The tool can provide structure in consultations, and is compatible with the concepts of ‘motivational interviewing’ and ‘individualised care-planning’. Suggestions for improvement related to content and layout. So far, the tool has only been available as a stand-alone online program, that is not connected to the electronic medical record systems. It was therefore suggested that the tool be integrated into the systems to enhance its usability and its uptake by healthcare providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5113148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51131482016-12-06 ‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool Slok, Annerika H M Twellaar, Mascha Jutbo, Leslie Kotz, Daniel Chavannes, Niels H Holverda, Sebastiaan Salomé, Philippe L Dekhuijzen, P N Richard Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H Schuiten, Denise in ’t Veen, Johannes C C M van Schayck, Onno C P NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article In the management of chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a shift from doctor-driven care to patient-centred integrated care with active involvement of and self-management by the patient. A recently developed tool, the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool, can be used in this transition to facilitate self-management support and shared decision-making. We performed a qualitative study, in which we collected and analysed the data using the methods of conventional content analyses. We performed in-depth interviews consisting of mainly open questions. Fifteen healthcare providers and 21 patients were interviewed who had worked with the ABC tool in daily care. In general, participants responded positively to the tool. Healthcare providers felt the visual representation provided was effective and comprehensible for patients and provided them with insight into their disease, a finding that patients confirmed. If patients were allowed to choose between a consultation with or without the ABC tool, the majority would prefer using the tool: it provides them with an overview and insight, which makes it easier to discuss all relevant topics related to COPD. The tool can provide structure in consultations, and is compatible with the concepts of ‘motivational interviewing’ and ‘individualised care-planning’. Suggestions for improvement related to content and layout. So far, the tool has only been available as a stand-alone online program, that is not connected to the electronic medical record systems. It was therefore suggested that the tool be integrated into the systems to enhance its usability and its uptake by healthcare providers. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5113148/ /pubmed/27853139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.74 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Slok, Annerika H M
Twellaar, Mascha
Jutbo, Leslie
Kotz, Daniel
Chavannes, Niels H
Holverda, Sebastiaan
Salomé, Philippe L
Dekhuijzen, P N Richard
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H
Schuiten, Denise
in ’t Veen, Johannes C C M
van Schayck, Onno C P
‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool
title ‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool
title_full ‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool
title_fullStr ‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool
title_full_unstemmed ‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool
title_short ‘To use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool
title_sort ‘to use or not to use’: a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of copd (abc) tool
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.74
work_keys_str_mv AT slokannerikahm touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT twellaarmascha touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT jutboleslie touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT kotzdaniel touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT chavannesnielsh touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT holverdasebastiaan touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT salomephilippel touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT dekhuijzenpnrichard touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureenpmh touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT schuitendenise touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT intveenjohannesccm touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool
AT vanschayckonnocp touseornottouseaqualitativestudytoevaluateexperiencesofhealthcareprovidersandpatientswiththeassessmentofburdenofcopdabctool