Cargando…

Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study

STUDY DESIGN. A randomized, controlled, single-center pilot study. OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of running a trial to explore if early intervention in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) would lead to an early return to work (RTW) and reduce sick leav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norbye, Anja Davis, Omdal, Aina Vedvik, Nygaard, Marit Eikrem, Romild, Ulla, Eldøen, Guttorm, Midgard, Rune
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001878
_version_ 1782468156475834368
author Norbye, Anja Davis
Omdal, Aina Vedvik
Nygaard, Marit Eikrem
Romild, Ulla
Eldøen, Guttorm
Midgard, Rune
author_facet Norbye, Anja Davis
Omdal, Aina Vedvik
Nygaard, Marit Eikrem
Romild, Ulla
Eldøen, Guttorm
Midgard, Rune
author_sort Norbye, Anja Davis
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN. A randomized, controlled, single-center pilot study. OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of running a trial to explore if early intervention in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) would lead to an early return to work (RTW) and reduce sick leave during 12 months of follow-up compared with patients on a 3-month waiting list. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Back pain is the reason for numerous absent days from work. In Norway, the government initiated a priority program, Earlier Return to Work (ERTW), to reduce work absences through early intervention. However, no proper evaluation has been performed on populations with CLBP. There is no consensus on how RTW should be measured. Only a few studies have examined how waiting time affects RTW. METHODS. Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. The group with early intervention was examined within 2 weeks, and the group on the waiting list was examined after 12 weeks. The intervention was identical in both groups and consisted of an outpatient, intensive back school. The data were obtained by questionnaire after 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was absence from work. RESULTS. The sample size in a full-scale study must comprise at least 382 patients on the basis of the assumptions in the pilot. In the pilot study, early intervention directly compared with an ordinary waiting list did not significantly affect the number of sick leave days after 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION. A prerequisite for launching a full-scale clinical trial is a redesign of the intervention, an improvement of procedures concerning inclusion and randomization, and finally a more precise definition of RTW. Level of Evidence: 3
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5113231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51132312016-11-23 Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study Norbye, Anja Davis Omdal, Aina Vedvik Nygaard, Marit Eikrem Romild, Ulla Eldøen, Guttorm Midgard, Rune Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Case Study STUDY DESIGN. A randomized, controlled, single-center pilot study. OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of running a trial to explore if early intervention in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) would lead to an early return to work (RTW) and reduce sick leave during 12 months of follow-up compared with patients on a 3-month waiting list. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Back pain is the reason for numerous absent days from work. In Norway, the government initiated a priority program, Earlier Return to Work (ERTW), to reduce work absences through early intervention. However, no proper evaluation has been performed on populations with CLBP. There is no consensus on how RTW should be measured. Only a few studies have examined how waiting time affects RTW. METHODS. Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. The group with early intervention was examined within 2 weeks, and the group on the waiting list was examined after 12 weeks. The intervention was identical in both groups and consisted of an outpatient, intensive back school. The data were obtained by questionnaire after 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was absence from work. RESULTS. The sample size in a full-scale study must comprise at least 382 patients on the basis of the assumptions in the pilot. In the pilot study, early intervention directly compared with an ordinary waiting list did not significantly affect the number of sick leave days after 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION. A prerequisite for launching a full-scale clinical trial is a redesign of the intervention, an improvement of procedures concerning inclusion and randomization, and finally a more precise definition of RTW. Level of Evidence: 3 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-11-01 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5113231/ /pubmed/27802253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001878 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Case Study
Norbye, Anja Davis
Omdal, Aina Vedvik
Nygaard, Marit Eikrem
Romild, Ulla
Eldøen, Guttorm
Midgard, Rune
Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study
title Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study
title_full Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study
title_fullStr Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study
title_short Do Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Benefit From Early Intervention Regarding Absence From Work?: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Pilot Study
title_sort do patients with chronic low back pain benefit from early intervention regarding absence from work?: a randomized, controlled, single-center pilot study
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001878
work_keys_str_mv AT norbyeanjadavis dopatientswithchroniclowbackpainbenefitfromearlyinterventionregardingabsencefromworkarandomizedcontrolledsinglecenterpilotstudy
AT omdalainavedvik dopatientswithchroniclowbackpainbenefitfromearlyinterventionregardingabsencefromworkarandomizedcontrolledsinglecenterpilotstudy
AT nygaardmariteikrem dopatientswithchroniclowbackpainbenefitfromearlyinterventionregardingabsencefromworkarandomizedcontrolledsinglecenterpilotstudy
AT romildulla dopatientswithchroniclowbackpainbenefitfromearlyinterventionregardingabsencefromworkarandomizedcontrolledsinglecenterpilotstudy
AT eldøenguttorm dopatientswithchroniclowbackpainbenefitfromearlyinterventionregardingabsencefromworkarandomizedcontrolledsinglecenterpilotstudy
AT midgardrune dopatientswithchroniclowbackpainbenefitfromearlyinterventionregardingabsencefromworkarandomizedcontrolledsinglecenterpilotstudy