Cargando…

Reference Clinical Database for Fixation Stability Metrics in Normal Subjects Measured with the MAIA Microperimeter

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a normal reference database for fixation stability measured with the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) in the Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimeter. METHODS: Subjects were 358 healthy volunteers who had the MAIA examination. Fixati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, Marco U., Saker, Saker, Wilde, Craig, Pellizzari, Carlo, Pallikaris, Aristophanes, Notaroberto, Neil, Rubinstein, Martin, Rui, Chiara, Limoli, Paolo, Smolek, Michael K., Amoaku, Winfried M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27867756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.6.6
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a normal reference database for fixation stability measured with the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) in the Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimeter. METHODS: Subjects were 358 healthy volunteers who had the MAIA examination. Fixation stability was assessed using two BCEA fixation indices (63% and 95% proportional values) and the percentage of fixation points within 1° and 2° from the fovea (P1 and P2). Statistical analysis was performed with linear regression and Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Average areas of 0.80 deg(2) (min = 0.03, max = 3.90, SD = 0.68) for the index BCEA@63% and 2.40 deg(2) (min = 0.20, max = 11.70, SD = 2.04) for the index BCEA@95% were found. The average values of P1 and P2 were 95% (min = 76, max = 100, SD = 5.31) and 99% (min = 91, max = 100, SD = 1.42), respectively. The Pearson's product moment test showed an almost perfect correlation index, r = 0.999, between BCEA@63% and BCEA@95%. Index P1 showed a very strong correlation with BCEA@63%, r = −0.924, as well as with BCEA@95%, r = −0.925. Index P2 demonstrated a slightly lower correlation with both BCEA@63% and BCEA@95%, r = −0.874 and −0.875, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The single parameter of the BCEA@95% may be taken as accurately reporting fixation stability and serves as a reference database of normal subjects with a cutoff area of 2.40 ± 2.04 deg(2) in MAIA microperimeter. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Fixation stability can be measured with different indices. This study originates reference fixation values for the MAIA using a single fixation index.