Cargando…

Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas

Avicennia and Rhizophora are globally occurring mangrove genera with different traits that place them in different parts of the intertidal zone. It is generally accepted that the oxidizing capacity of Avicennia roots is larger than that of Rhizophora roots, which initiates more reduced conditions in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balk, Melike, Keuskamp, Joost A., Laanbroek, Hendrikus J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01855
_version_ 1782468319365824512
author Balk, Melike
Keuskamp, Joost A.
Laanbroek, Hendrikus J.
author_facet Balk, Melike
Keuskamp, Joost A.
Laanbroek, Hendrikus J.
author_sort Balk, Melike
collection PubMed
description Avicennia and Rhizophora are globally occurring mangrove genera with different traits that place them in different parts of the intertidal zone. It is generally accepted that the oxidizing capacity of Avicennia roots is larger than that of Rhizophora roots, which initiates more reduced conditions in the soil below the latter genus. We hypothesize that the more reduced conditions beneath Rhizophora stands lead to more active sulfate-reducing microbial communities compared to Avicennia stands. To test this hypothesis, we measured sulfate reduction traits in soil samples collected from neighboring Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle stands at three different locations in southern Florida. The traits measured were sulfate reduction rates (SRR) in flow-through reactors containing undisturbed soil layers in the absence and presence of easily degradable carbon compounds, copy numbers of the dsrB gene, which is specific for sulfate-reducing microorganisms, and numbers of sulfate-reducing cells that are able to grow in liquid medium on a mixture of acetate, propionate and lactate as electron donors. At the tidal locations Port of the Islands and South Hutchinson Islands, steady state SRR, dsrB gene copy numbers and numbers of culturable cells were higher at the A. germinans than at the R. mangle stands, although not significantly for the numbers at Port of the Islands. At the non-tidal location North Hutchinson Island, results are mixed with respect to these sulfate reduction traits. At all locations, the fraction of culturable cells were significantly higher at the R. mangle than at the A. germinans stands. The dynamics of the initial SRR implied a more in situ active sulfate-reducing community at the intertidal R. mangle stands. It was concluded that in agreement with our hypothesis R. mangle stands accommodate a more active sulfate-reducing community than A. germinans stands, but only at the tidal locations. The differences between R. mangle and A. germinans stands were absent at the non-tidal, impounded location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5114281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51142812016-12-02 Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas Balk, Melike Keuskamp, Joost A. Laanbroek, Hendrikus J. Front Microbiol Microbiology Avicennia and Rhizophora are globally occurring mangrove genera with different traits that place them in different parts of the intertidal zone. It is generally accepted that the oxidizing capacity of Avicennia roots is larger than that of Rhizophora roots, which initiates more reduced conditions in the soil below the latter genus. We hypothesize that the more reduced conditions beneath Rhizophora stands lead to more active sulfate-reducing microbial communities compared to Avicennia stands. To test this hypothesis, we measured sulfate reduction traits in soil samples collected from neighboring Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle stands at three different locations in southern Florida. The traits measured were sulfate reduction rates (SRR) in flow-through reactors containing undisturbed soil layers in the absence and presence of easily degradable carbon compounds, copy numbers of the dsrB gene, which is specific for sulfate-reducing microorganisms, and numbers of sulfate-reducing cells that are able to grow in liquid medium on a mixture of acetate, propionate and lactate as electron donors. At the tidal locations Port of the Islands and South Hutchinson Islands, steady state SRR, dsrB gene copy numbers and numbers of culturable cells were higher at the A. germinans than at the R. mangle stands, although not significantly for the numbers at Port of the Islands. At the non-tidal location North Hutchinson Island, results are mixed with respect to these sulfate reduction traits. At all locations, the fraction of culturable cells were significantly higher at the R. mangle than at the A. germinans stands. The dynamics of the initial SRR implied a more in situ active sulfate-reducing community at the intertidal R. mangle stands. It was concluded that in agreement with our hypothesis R. mangle stands accommodate a more active sulfate-reducing community than A. germinans stands, but only at the tidal locations. The differences between R. mangle and A. germinans stands were absent at the non-tidal, impounded location. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5114281/ /pubmed/27917167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01855 Text en Copyright © 2016 Balk, Keuskamp and Laanbroek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Balk, Melike
Keuskamp, Joost A.
Laanbroek, Hendrikus J.
Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas
title Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas
title_full Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas
title_fullStr Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas
title_full_unstemmed Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas
title_short Potential for Sulfate Reduction in Mangrove Forest Soils: Comparison between Two Dominant Species of the Americas
title_sort potential for sulfate reduction in mangrove forest soils: comparison between two dominant species of the americas
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01855
work_keys_str_mv AT balkmelike potentialforsulfatereductioninmangroveforestsoilscomparisonbetweentwodominantspeciesoftheamericas
AT keuskampjoosta potentialforsulfatereductioninmangroveforestsoilscomparisonbetweentwodominantspeciesoftheamericas
AT laanbroekhendrikusj potentialforsulfatereductioninmangroveforestsoilscomparisonbetweentwodominantspeciesoftheamericas