Cargando…
Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment
Peatland ecosystem services include drinking water provision, flood mitigation, habitat provision and carbon sequestration. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal is a key treatment process for the supply of potable water downstream from peat-dominated catchments. A transition from peat-forming Spha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36751 |
_version_ | 1782468382100029440 |
---|---|
author | Ritson, Jonathan P. Bell, Michael Brazier, Richard E. Grand-Clement, Emilie Graham, Nigel J. D. Freeman, Chris Smith, David Templeton, Michael R. Clark, Joanna M. |
author_facet | Ritson, Jonathan P. Bell, Michael Brazier, Richard E. Grand-Clement, Emilie Graham, Nigel J. D. Freeman, Chris Smith, David Templeton, Michael R. Clark, Joanna M. |
author_sort | Ritson, Jonathan P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Peatland ecosystem services include drinking water provision, flood mitigation, habitat provision and carbon sequestration. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal is a key treatment process for the supply of potable water downstream from peat-dominated catchments. A transition from peat-forming Sphagnum moss to vascular plants has been observed in peatlands degraded by (a) land management, (b) atmospheric deposition and (c) climate change. Here within we show that the presence of vascular plants with higher annual above-ground biomass production leads to a seasonal addition of labile plant material into the peatland ecosystem as litter recalcitrance is lower. The net effect will be a smaller litter carbon pool due to higher rates of decomposition, and a greater seasonal pattern of DOC flux. Conventional water treatment involving coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation may be impeded by vascular plant-derived DOC. It has been shown that vascular plant-derived DOC is more difficult to remove via these methods than DOC derived from Sphagnum, whilst also being less susceptible to microbial mineralisation before reaching the treatment works. These results provide evidence that practices aimed at re-establishing Sphagnum moss on degraded peatlands could reduce costs and improve efficacy at water treatment works, offering an alternative to ‘end-of-pipe’ solutions through management of ecosystem service provision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5114669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51146692016-11-25 Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment Ritson, Jonathan P. Bell, Michael Brazier, Richard E. Grand-Clement, Emilie Graham, Nigel J. D. Freeman, Chris Smith, David Templeton, Michael R. Clark, Joanna M. Sci Rep Article Peatland ecosystem services include drinking water provision, flood mitigation, habitat provision and carbon sequestration. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal is a key treatment process for the supply of potable water downstream from peat-dominated catchments. A transition from peat-forming Sphagnum moss to vascular plants has been observed in peatlands degraded by (a) land management, (b) atmospheric deposition and (c) climate change. Here within we show that the presence of vascular plants with higher annual above-ground biomass production leads to a seasonal addition of labile plant material into the peatland ecosystem as litter recalcitrance is lower. The net effect will be a smaller litter carbon pool due to higher rates of decomposition, and a greater seasonal pattern of DOC flux. Conventional water treatment involving coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation may be impeded by vascular plant-derived DOC. It has been shown that vascular plant-derived DOC is more difficult to remove via these methods than DOC derived from Sphagnum, whilst also being less susceptible to microbial mineralisation before reaching the treatment works. These results provide evidence that practices aimed at re-establishing Sphagnum moss on degraded peatlands could reduce costs and improve efficacy at water treatment works, offering an alternative to ‘end-of-pipe’ solutions through management of ecosystem service provision. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5114669/ /pubmed/27857210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36751 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Ritson, Jonathan P. Bell, Michael Brazier, Richard E. Grand-Clement, Emilie Graham, Nigel J. D. Freeman, Chris Smith, David Templeton, Michael R. Clark, Joanna M. Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
title | Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
title_full | Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
title_fullStr | Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
title_short | Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
title_sort | managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ritsonjonathanp managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT bellmichael managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT brazierricharde managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT grandclementemilie managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT grahamnigeljd managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT freemanchris managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT smithdavid managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT templetonmichaelr managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment AT clarkjoannam managingpeatlandvegetationfordrinkingwatertreatment |